Avoiding Structural Failure Modes in Tabular Fair SSL: Online Primal-Dual Allocation under Confidence Gating
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16446v1
- Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 01:43:32 GMT
- Title: Avoiding Structural Failure Modes in Tabular Fair SSL: Online Primal-Dual Allocation under Confidence Gating
- Abstract summary: Semi-supervised learning (SSL) enables prediction with limited labels, but high-stakes applications (medical, credit, recidivism) require statistical fairness guarantees.<n>We propose Online Primal-Dual Allocation (OPDA), an online controller that schedules fairness and entropy-based stability penalties using violation, risk, and pseudo-label health signals.
- Score: 5.890873839907491
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Semi-supervised learning (SSL) enables prediction with limited labels, but high-stakes tabular applications (medical, credit, recidivism) require statistical fairness guarantees. We identify a structural conflict in tabular fair SSL through a diagnostic stress test: under confidence-gated pseudo-labeling, moment-matching fairness regularizers can trigger two failure modes -- Masking Collapse (fairness erodes confidence, starving pseudo-labels) and Trivial Saturation (drift to constant predictors). We propose Online Primal-Dual Allocation (OPDA), an online controller that schedules fairness and entropy-based stability penalties using violation, risk, and pseudo-label health signals, avoiding per-dataset selection of a fixed fairness weight within this diagnostic regime. On the evaluated tabular benchmarks (Adult, ACSIncome, COMPAS), OPDA mitigates the degenerate regimes observed under static weighting and simple single-signal adaptive baselines. On Adult and COMPAS, it yields non-degenerate operating points competitive with the empirical static-$λ$ frontier; on ACSIncome, it preserves utility with a wider fairness-utility spread. Relative to OPDA-lite, the full controller mainly shifts the operating point toward higher utility on ACSIncome, while Adult highlights the fairness-utility trade-off between the two variants. These results position OPDA as a calibration-free controller for non-degenerate operating points in tabular fair SSL without per-dataset tuning.
Related papers
- FedLAS: Feature-Modulated Bidirectional Label Smoothing for Neural Network Calibration [2.2346611200823934]
Deep Neural Network (DNN) classifiers suffer from poor calibration when their softmax outputs deviate from the empirical likelihoods.<n>We propose FedLAS: Feature-Modulated Bidirectional Label Smoothing, a plug-and-play algorithm for label smoothing-based losses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-26T23:55:44Z) - Post-hoc Provider Fairness Adaptation via Hierarchical Exposure Alignment [54.58748721533078]
Post-hoc Fairness Adaptation (PFA) is a lightweight framework that equips a frozen recommender with a fairness adapter.<n>It learns personalized additive score adjustments from user-item embeddings to steer provider exposure toward fairness.<n>PFA achieves substantial fairness gains with negligible accuracy loss, consistently outperforming strong baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-02T16:32:52Z) - PRISM: Probability Reallocation with In-Span Masking for Knowledge-Sensitive Alignment [18.04153868078285]
We study an augmented SFT setting in which training instances include coarse sentence-level factuality risk labels and inter-sentence dependency annotations.<n>We propose textbfPRISM, a differentiable risk-gated framework that modifies learning only at fact-critical positions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-02T06:35:04Z) - Byzantine-Robust and Differentially Private Federated Optimization under Weaker Assumptions [89.52532304099522]
Federated Learning (FL) enables clients to collaboratively train a shared model without centralizing their raw data, offering an inherent level of privacy.<n> gradients and model updates can still leak sensitive information, while malicious servers may mount adversarial attacks such as Byzantine manipulation.<n>These vulnerabilities highlight the need to address differential privacy (DP) and Byzantine robustness within a unified framework.<n>We propose Byz-Clip21-SGD2M, a new algorithm that integrates robust aggregation with double momentum and carefully designed clipping.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-24T17:39:09Z) - Adversarial Stress Tests for Quantum Certification [0.0]
Apparent violations of classical benchmarks need not signal genuinely non-classical behaviour.<n>We formalise a protocol-agnostic alignment principle based on a martingale-safe lower confidence bound.<n>We show that adaptive learning-based classical agents do not enlarge the admissible classical set.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-13T03:49:58Z) - Improving Search Agent with One Line of Code [68.58667107354253]
Tool-based Agentic Reinforcement Learning (TARL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for training search agents to interact with external tools.<n>We propose textbfSearch textbfAgent textbfPolicy textbfOptimization (textbfSAPO), which stabilizes training via a conditional token-level KL constraint.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-10T04:07:39Z) - LATA: Laplacian-Assisted Transductive Adaptation for Conformal Uncertainty in Medical VLMs [61.06744611795341]
Medical vision-language models (VLMs) are strong zero-shot recognizers for medical imaging.<n>We propose texttttextbfLATA (Laplacian-Assisted Transductive Adaptation), a textittraining- and label-free refinement.<n>texttttextbfLATA sharpens zero-shot predictions without compromising exchangeability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-19T16:45:38Z) - Semi-Supervised Regression with Heteroscedastic Pseudo-Labels [50.54050677867914]
We propose an uncertainty-aware pseudo-labeling framework that dynamically adjusts pseudo-label influence from a bi-level optimization perspective.<n>We provide theoretical insights and extensive experiments to validate our approach across various benchmark SSR datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-17T03:06:23Z) - Unsupervised Conformal Inference: Bootstrapping and Alignment to Control LLM Uncertainty [49.19257648205146]
We propose an unsupervised conformal inference framework for generation.<n>Our gates achieve close-to-nominal coverage and provide tighter, more stable thresholds than split UCP.<n>The result is a label-free, API-compatible gate for test-time filtering.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-26T23:40:47Z) - Stratify: Rethinking Federated Learning for Non-IID Data through Balanced Sampling [9.774529150331297]
Stratify is a novel FL framework designed to systematically manage class and feature distributions throughout training.<n>Inspired by classical stratified sampling, our approach employs a Stratified Label Schedule (SLS) to ensure balanced exposure across labels.<n>To uphold privacy, we implement a secure client selection protocol leveraging homomorphic encryption.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-18T04:44:41Z) - A Channel-ensemble Approach: Unbiased and Low-variance Pseudo-labels is Critical for Semi-supervised Classification [61.473485511491795]
Semi-supervised learning (SSL) is a practical challenge in computer vision.
Pseudo-label (PL) methods, e.g., FixMatch and FreeMatch, obtain the State Of The Art (SOTA) performances in SSL.
We propose a lightweight channel-based ensemble method to consolidate multiple inferior PLs into the theoretically guaranteed unbiased and low-variance one.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-27T09:49:37Z) - The Decaying Missing-at-Random Framework: Model Doubly Robust Causal Inference with Partially Labeled Data [8.916614661563893]
We introduce a missing-at-random (decaying MAR) framework and associated approaches for doubly robust causal inference.<n>This simultaneously addresses selection bias in the labeling mechanism and the extreme imbalance between labeled and unlabeled groups.<n>To ensure robust causal conclusions, we propose a bias-reduced SS estimator for the average treatment effect.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-22T07:37:12Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.