Learning Normal Representations for Blood Biomarkers
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.18701v1
- Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 17:37:05 GMT
- Title: Learning Normal Representations for Blood Biomarkers
- Abstract summary: Blood-based biomarkers underpin clinical diagnosis and management.<n>Population-based interpretation can mask meaningful deviation from an individual's baseline, risking delayed disease detection.<n>We introduce NORMA, a conditional transformer-based framework that generates reference intervals by conditioning on both a patient's history and population-level data about "normal" variation.
- Score: 1.7260659482110565
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Blood-based biomarkers underpin clinical diagnosis and management, yet their interpretation relies largely on fixed population reference intervals that ignore stable, intra-patient variability. As such, population-based interpretation can mask meaningful deviation from an individual's baseline, risking delayed disease detection. To remedy this, there have been increasing efforts to personalize blood biomarker interpretation using individual testing histories. However, these methods may overfit to sparse data, inflating false-positive rates and unnecessary follow-up, and can also unwittingly include unrecognized or subclinical disease. Here, we leverage nearly 2 billion longitudinal laboratory measurements from over 1.6 million individuals across North America, the Middle East, and East Asia, to show that while laboratory values are highly individual, purely personalized intervals routinely overfit, classifying up to 68% of measurements as abnormal, without corresponding associations with adverse clinical outcomes. We then introduce NORMA, a conditional transformer-based framework that generates reference intervals by conditioning on both a patient's history and population-level data about "normal" variation. NORMA-derived intervals achieve higher precision for predicting outcomes, including mortality, acute kidney injury, and chronic disease. These findings caution against over-personalization in laboratory medicine and demonstrate that anchoring individual trajectories to population-level priors outperforms either approach alone. To promote transparency, we publicly release the model, code, and an interactive user interface for accessible, individualized laboratory interpretation.
Related papers
- Robust inference for risk heterogeneity under group imbalance [8.713612612607408]
In intensive care unit studies, mortality risk associated with specific admission diagnoses can vary across ethnic groups.<n>Existing approaches for detecting risk heterogeneity are often sensitive to baseline model misspecification and regularization bias.<n>We propose a robust framework for inferring risk heterogeneity between two populations using Neymanity estimators that are locally insensitive to nuisance parameter estimation error.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-30T16:35:45Z) - Correcting heterogeneous diagnostic bias when developing clinical prediction models using causal hidden Markov models [2.3491907829767533]
This paper proposes a method to correct for such bias in prediction models due to differential diagnostic delay.<n>We validate our approach in simulated data and apply it to a case study of chronic kidney disease prediction using electronic health records.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-07T11:43:47Z) - Resolving the bias-precision paradox with stochastic causal representation learning for personalized medicine [31.644027724480235]
Estimating individualized treatment effects from longitudinal observational data is central to data-driven medicine.<n>Here, we identify this tension as a bias-precision paradox in causal representation learning.<n>We introduce sampling-based maximum discrepancy (sMMD) to replace global adversarial with subset-level matching.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-07T05:51:21Z) - Simulating clinical interventions with a generative multimodal model of human physiology [49.828582089394445]
HealthFormer is a decoder-only transformer that models the human physiological trajectory generatively.<n>We tokenise each participant's health trajectory across 667 measurements spanning seven domains.<n>HealthFormer improves prediction for 27 of 30 incident-disease and mortality endpoints, exceeding established clinical risk scores in every comparison.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-30T14:10:30Z) - PUNCH: Physics-informed Uncertainty-aware Network for Coronary Hemodynamics [8.812266680285369]
We introduce a non-diagnosed, uncertainty-aware framework for estimating coronary flow reserve directly from standard angiography.<n>The system integrates physics-informed neural networks with variational inference to infer coronary blood flow from first-principles models of contrast transport.<n>The pipeline runs in approximately three minutes per patient on a single GPU, with no population-level training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-23T21:47:23Z) - Intersectional Fairness in Vision-Language Models for Medical Image Disease Classification [25.30858592524878]
Cross-Modal Alignment Consistency (CMAC-MMD) is a training framework that standardises diagnostic certainty across intersectional patient subgroups.<n>In the dermatology cohort, the proposed method reduced the overall intersectional missed diagnosis gap (difference in True Positive Rate, $$TPR) from 0.50 to 0.26.<n>For glaucoma screening, the method reduced $$TPR from 0.41 to 0.31, achieving a better AUC of 0.72 (vs. 0.71 baseline)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-17T09:47:29Z) - Lifestyle-Informed Personalized Blood Biomarker Prediction via Novel Representation Learning [7.845988771273181]
We introduce a novel framework for predicting future blood biomarker values.
Our proposed method learns a similarity-based embedding space that captures the complex relationship between biomarkers and lifestyle factors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-09T23:52:53Z) - Using Pre-training and Interaction Modeling for ancestry-specific disease prediction in UK Biobank [69.90493129893112]
Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have uncovered the genetic basis of complex traits, but show an under-representation of non-European descent individuals.
Here, we assess whether we can improve disease prediction across diverse ancestries using multiomic data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-26T16:39:50Z) - Statistical and Computational Phase Transitions in Group Testing [73.55361918807883]
We study the group testing problem where the goal is to identify a set of k infected individuals carrying a rare disease.
We consider two different simple random procedures for assigning individuals tests.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-15T16:38:50Z) - MURAL: An Unsupervised Random Forest-Based Embedding for Electronic
Health Record Data [59.26381272149325]
We present an unsupervised random forest for representing data with disparate variable types.
MURAL forests consist of a set of decision trees where node-splitting variables are chosen at random.
We show that using our approach, we can visualize and classify data more accurately than competing approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-19T22:02:21Z) - Bootstrapping Your Own Positive Sample: Contrastive Learning With
Electronic Health Record Data [62.29031007761901]
This paper proposes a novel contrastive regularized clinical classification model.
We introduce two unique positive sampling strategies specifically tailored for EHR data.
Our framework yields highly competitive experimental results in predicting the mortality risk on real-world COVID-19 EHR data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-07T06:02:04Z) - Increasing the efficiency of randomized trial estimates via linear
adjustment for a prognostic score [59.75318183140857]
Estimating causal effects from randomized experiments is central to clinical research.
Most methods for historical borrowing achieve reductions in variance by sacrificing strict type-I error rate control.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-17T21:10:10Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.