Improving Quantized Model Performance in Qualitative Analysis with Multi-Pass Prompt Verification

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20193v1
• Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2026 04:50:03 GMT
• Title: Improving Quantized Model Performance in Qualitative Analysis with Multi-Pass Prompt Verification
• Abstract summary: Quantized Large Language Models (LLMs) are used more often in qualitative analysis because they run fast and need fewer computing resources.<n>This study examines how different lower bits quantization levels affect the performance of LLaMA-3.1 on qualitative analysis.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Quantized Large Language Models (LLMs) are used more often in qualitative analysis because they run fast and need fewer computing resources. This study examines how different lower bits quantization levels (8-bit, 4-bit, 3-bit, and 2-bit) and quantization types affect the performance of LLaMA-3.1 (8B) on qualitative analysis. The study uses expert and non-expert responses from 82 interview transcripts. Low-bit models often produce higher levels of hallucinations and unstable results, especially when reading non-expert language with unclear terms. To improve performance, we propose a quantization-aware multi-pass prompt verification method. This method guides the model through controlled steps that reduce hallucinations. It removes unreliable content and passes the results to the next transcript after verification, improving accuracy. To validate performance, human coders analyzed transcripts using NVivo and BF16 LLaMA. BF16 LLaMA-3.1 produced high-precision output but had semantic drift and hallucination. These errors were corrected manually. The corrected BF16 output and NVivo human coding were combined to create a gold-standard ground truth (GSGT) for thematic extraction and frequency analysis. The results show that 8-bit models stay closest to the GSGT. The 4-bit models lose accuracy but become stable when the proposed method is applied. The 3-bit and 2-bit models drop in performance because of heavy compression, but they improve with the proposed prompt design and verification. The study also finds that models at the same bit level behave differently depending on quantization type. Overall, the method helps low-resource LLMs become more stable, accurate, and suitable for qualitative research at lower cost.

Related papers

• Extreme Low-Bit Inference in Reasoning Models: Failure Modes and Targeted Recovery [40.94400211806987]
  We show that aggressive 2-bit inference can fail to deliver end-to-end speedup because instability in the generation process inflates total token count.<n>We analyze full reasoning traces of Qwen3 reasoning models across mathematical and commonsense benchmarks.<n>Our results show that extreme low-bit reasoning becomes practical when its failures are treated as controllable generation pathologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-01T10:04:09Z)
• K-Quantization and its Impact on Output Performance [1.1458853556386797]
  This paper investigates the performance of eight large language models (LLMs) at various quantization levels.<n>Findings indicate that while lower bit precision generally reduces performance, the impact varies across models and tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-19T10:31:47Z)
• LiveFMBench: Unveiling the Power and Limits of Agentic Workflows in Specification Generation [75.05397479715576]
  Large language models (LLMs) and agents have shown promising progress, but their true capabilities and failure modes remain unclear.<n>We present the first systematic and contamination-aware study of LLM- and agent-based formal specification generation for C programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-02T11:31:33Z)
• Low-bit Model Quantization for Deep Neural Networks: A Survey [123.89598730307208]
  This article surveys the recent five-year progress towards low-bit quantization on deep neural networks (DNNs)<n>We discuss and compare the state-of-the-art quantization methods and classify them into 8 main categories and 24 sub-categories according to their core techniques.<n>We shed light on the potential research opportunities in the field of model quantization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-08T13:26:19Z)
• Pushing the Limits of Low-Bit Optimizers: A Focus on EMA Dynamics [64.62231094774211]
  Statefuls (e.g., Adam) maintain auxiliary information even 2x the model size in order to achieve optimal convergence.<n>SOLO enables Adam-styles to maintain quantized states with precision as low as 3 bits, or even 2 bits.<n>SOLO can thus be seamlessly applied to Adam-styles, leading to substantial memory savings with minimal accuracy loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-01T06:47:45Z)
• Quantization Hurts Reasoning? An Empirical Study on Quantized Reasoning Models [48.98109982725689]
  We conduct the first systematic study on quantized reasoning models.<n>Our investigation covers weight, KV cache, and activation quantization using state-of-the-art algorithms at varying bit-widths.<n>We identify model size, model origin, and task difficulty as critical determinants of performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T08:22:45Z)
• Quantization for OpenAI's Whisper Models: A Comparative Analysis [0.0]
  This paper studies Whisper and two model variants: one optimized for live speech streaming and another for offline transcription.<n>Larger model variants exhibit increased latency and pose challenges for deployment on resource-constrained devices.<n>Results show that quantization reduces latency 19% and model size by 45%, while preserving transcription accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T23:50:35Z)
• ParetoQ: Improving Scaling Laws in Extremely Low-bit LLM Quantization [73.60493264901359]
  We present a unified framework for rigorous comparisons across 1-bit, 1.58-bit, 2-bit, 3-bit, and 4-bit quantization settings.<n>We show that ternary, 2-bit, and 3-bit quantization maintains comparable performance in the size-accuracy trade-off.<n>Considering hardware constraints, 2-bit quantization offers promising potential for memory reduction and speedup.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-04T18:59:26Z)
• "Give Me BF16 or Give Me Death"? Accuracy-Performance Trade-Offs in LLM Quantization [67.3213104337679]
  Quantization is a powerful tool for accelerating large language model (LLM) inference, but the accuracy-performance trade-offs across different formats remain unclear.<n>We conduct the most comprehensive empirical study to date, evaluating FP8, INT8, and INT4 quantization across academic benchmarks and real-world tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T18:21:59Z)
• Exploring the Trade-Offs: Quantization Methods, Task Difficulty, and Model Size in Large Language Models From Edge to Giant [11.832907585157638]
  Quantization has gained attention as a promising solution for the cost-effective deployment of large and small language models.<n>We conduct a comprehensive evaluation of instruction-tuned models spanning 1B to 405B parameters, applying four quantization methods across 13 datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-17T10:31:37Z)
• Characterizing and Understanding the Behavior of Quantized Models for Reliable Deployment [32.01355605506855]
  Quantization-aware training can produce more stable models than standard, adversarial, and Mixup training. Disagreements often have closer top-1 and top-2 output probabilities, and $Margin$ is a better indicator than the other uncertainty metrics to distinguish disagreements. We opensource our code and models as a new benchmark for further studying the quantized models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-08T11:19:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.