Robust Personalized Recommendation under Hidden Confounding in MNAR

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21066v1
• Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 11:53:12 GMT
• Title: Robust Personalized Recommendation under Hidden Confounding in MNAR
• Abstract summary: Inverse propensity weighting and doubly robust estimators are unreliable in the presence of hidden confounders.<n>We propose a novel framework, which estimates user--item level sensitivity bounds.<n>Our approach significantly outperforms global methods under hidden confounding.
• Score: 3.1497178896386995
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Recommender systems often rely on observational user--item interaction data, which is prone to selection bias due to users' selective interactions with items. Inverse propensity weighting and doubly robust estimators effectively mitigate selection bias under observed confounding, but are unreliable in the presence of hidden confounders. Existing approaches relying on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or global sensitivity bounds are constrained in practice: RCTs demand costly experimental data, while global sensitivity bounds presume a uniformly bounded effect of unmeasured confounders on propensities through sensitivity analysis, thereby neglecting heterogeneity across user--item interactions. To overcome this limitation, we propose a novel framework, which estimates user--item level sensitivity bounds, thereby substantially relaxing the homogeneity assumption inherent in global sensitivity bounds named Personalized Unobserved-Confounding-aware Interaction Deconfounder (PUID). To ensure both robustness and predictive accuracy, we further develop an adversarial optimization strategy and propose a benchmark-guided variant (BPUID) that incorporates pre-trained models as stabilizing references. Extensive experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms global methods under hidden confounding, without requiring RCT data.

Related papers

• Preference Data Selection for Mitigating the Alignment Tax in Large Language Models [52.18310687523229]
  BALIGN is a balanced data selection strategy that mitigates catastrophic forgetting while optimizing alignment efficacy.<n>By aggregating three key data-centric features into a unified composite risk score, BALIGN systematically filters out high-risk preference samples.<n>Experiments on standard human preference datasets demonstrate that BALIGN strongly preserves foundational capabilities without compromising alignment gains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-25T07:58:42Z)
• Joint Model and Data Sparsification via the Marginal Likelihood [53.29070892356214]
  We propose jointly learning individual feature and sample relevancies, enabling simultaneous model and data sparsification.<n>This symmetric pruning of model and data offers a natural extension that preserves conjugacy.<n> Empirical results across diverse regression tasks affirm that a joint ARD approach consistently yields both sparse and robust prediction models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T13:26:53Z)
• Resource-Constrained Affect Modelling via Variance Regularisation Pruning [1.4323566945483497]
  We introduce Variance-Regularised Pruning (VR), a pruning framework that incorporates cross-participant stability into the sparsification process.<n>We evaluate the proposed approach on the AGAIN dataset, which includes arousal annotations collected across nine affect-eliciting game environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-26T12:05:13Z)
• Robust Aggregation for Federated Sequential Recommendation with Sparse and Poisoned Data [2.9515750844111106]
  Federated sequential recommendation distributes model training across user devices so that behavioural data remains local, reducing privacy risks.<n>Yet, this setting introduces two intertwined difficulties.<n>Individual clients typically contribute only short and highly sparse interaction sequences, limiting the reliability of learned user representations.<n>We propose a robust aggregation framework tailored for federated sequential recommendation under sparse and adversarial conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T12:50:44Z)
• FedUTR: Federated Recommendation with Augmented Universal Textual Representation for Sparse Interaction Scenarios [58.33672784127872]
  Federated recommendations (FRs) have emerged as an on-device privacy-preserving paradigm.<n>We propose a novel method named FedUTR, which incorporates item textual representations as a complement to interaction behaviors.<n>Our method achieves superior performance, with improvements of up to 59% across all datasets compared to the SOTA baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T08:55:19Z)
• RMBRec: Robust Multi-Behavior Recommendation towards Target Behaviors [26.88506691092044]
  We propose Robust Multi-Behavior Recommendation towards Target Behaviors (RMBRec)<n>RMBRec is a robust multi-behavior recommendation framework grounded in an information-theoretic robustness principle.<n>We show that RMBRec outperforms state-of-the-art methods in accuracy and maintains remarkable stability under various noise perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-13T16:34:17Z)
• Semi-Supervised Regression with Heteroscedastic Pseudo-Labels [50.54050677867914]
  We propose an uncertainty-aware pseudo-labeling framework that dynamically adjusts pseudo-label influence from a bi-level optimization perspective.<n>We provide theoretical insights and extensive experiments to validate our approach across various benchmark SSR datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-17T03:06:23Z)
• A Novel Generative Model with Causality Constraint for Mitigating Biases in Recommender Systems [20.672668625179526]
  Latent confounding bias can obscure the true causal relationship between user feedback and item exposure.<n>We propose a novel generative framework called Latent Causality Constraints for Debiasing representation learning in Recommender Systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T14:09:39Z)
• The Risk of Federated Learning to Skew Fine-Tuning Features and Underperform Out-of-Distribution Robustness [50.52507648690234]
  Federated learning has the risk of skewing fine-tuning features and compromising the robustness of the model. We introduce three robustness indicators and conduct experiments across diverse robust datasets. Our approach markedly enhances the robustness across diverse scenarios, encompassing various parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-25T09:18:51Z)
• Adaptive Federated Learning via New Entropy Approach [14.595709494370372]
  Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a prominent distributed machine learning framework. In this paper, we propose an adaptive FEDerated learning algorithm based on ENTropy theory (FedEnt) to alleviate the parameter deviation among heterogeneous clients.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-27T07:57:04Z)
• Rethinking Missing Data: Aleatoric Uncertainty-Aware Recommendation [59.500347564280204]
  We propose a new Aleatoric Uncertainty-aware Recommendation (AUR) framework. AUR consists of a new uncertainty estimator along with a normal recommender model. As the chance of mislabeling reflects the potential of a pair, AUR makes recommendations according to the uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-22T04:32:51Z)
• Attribute-Guided Adversarial Training for Robustness to Natural Perturbations [64.35805267250682]
  We propose an adversarial training approach which learns to generate new samples so as to maximize exposure of the classifier to the attributes-space. Our approach enables deep neural networks to be robust against a wide range of naturally occurring perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-03T10:17:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.