Anomaly-Informed Confidence Calibration for Vision-Based Safety Prediction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21109v1
• Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 12:43:09 GMT
• Title: Anomaly-Informed Confidence Calibration for Vision-Based Safety Prediction
• Abstract summary: We identify a critical perception-dynamics gap in existing anomaly signals.<n>We propose an Anomaly-Informed Online approach that fuses two anomaly scores extracted from a world model.
• Score: 1.0981335059631014
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Reliable confidence estimates are important for safely deploying vision-based controllers in autonomous racing, where safety predictions must be derived from camera images, yet modern predictors become dangerously overconfident under test-time distribution shifts. We identify a critical perception-dynamics gap in existing anomaly signals: widely used scores, such as autoencoder reconstruction error, capture visual corruptions but miss dynamics anomalies (e.g., actuation bias, latency), where images remain plausible while the trajectory degrades. To address this, we propose an Anomaly-Informed Online Calibration approach that, without retraining any model component, fuses two complementary anomaly scores extracted from a world model: a perceptual score from reconstruction error and a dynamics score from epistemic uncertainty and control-stream statistics. Based on these fused scores, a lightweight temperature-scaling calibrator leverages test-time augmentation to selectively reduce overconfidence under shift while preserving nominal-condition performance. Experiments on a physical DonkeyCar under four real-world anomaly protocols unseen during training (darkness, blur, actuation bias, processing latency) reduce average expected calibration error from 0.184 to 0.116, a 37% improvement over the best baseline, without modifying the base safety predictor.

Related papers

• Conformal Changepoint Localization and Root Cause Analysis with Corrupted Observations [55.76952683833966]
  This paper proposes weighted CONCH (W-CONCH) and weighted CROC (W-CROC) to reduce confidence set size when data may be corrupted.<n>Experiments on image-based and real-world changepoint and root-cause benchmarks show that uncertainty-based weighting substantially reduces confidence set size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-29T05:16:59Z)
• Discovery of Hidden Miscalibration Regimes [52.452902154360565]
  Models may be systematically overconfident on some kinds of inputs and underconfident on others.<n>We define the corresponding miscalibration field and propose a diagnostic framework for estimating it.<n>Our approach learns a calibration-aware representation of the input space and estimates signed local miscalibration by kernel smoothing in the learned geometry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T13:07:50Z)
• Mitigating Error Amplification in Fast Adversarial Training [58.74042726356826]
  Fast Adversarial Training (FAT) has proven effective in enhancing model robustness by encouraging networks to learn perturbation-invariant representations.<n>FAT often suffers from catastrophic overfitting (CO), where the model overfits to the training attack and fails to generalize to unseen ones.<n>We propose a Distribution-aware Dynamic Guidance (DDG) strategy that dynamically adjusts both the perturbation budget and supervision signal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-27T11:23:18Z)
• Temperature Scaling Attack Disrupting Model Confidence in Federated Learning [4.863985119779627]
  We present the Temperature Scaling Attack (TSA), a training-time attack that degrades calibration while preserving accuracy.<n>Our results establish calibration integrity as a critical attack surface in federated learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-06T12:01:54Z)
• Towards Adversarial Robustness and Uncertainty Quantification in DINOv2-based Few-Shot Anomaly Detection [6.288045889067255]
  Foundation models such as DINOv2 have shown strong performance in few-shot anomaly detection.<n>We present one of the first systematic studies of adversarial attacks and uncertainty estimation in this setting.<n>We find that raw anomaly scores are poorly calibrated, revealing a gap between confidence and correctness that limits safety-critical use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-15T15:06:45Z)
• Coverage-Guaranteed Speech Emotion Recognition via Calibrated Uncertainty-Adaptive Prediction Sets [0.0]
  Road rage, often triggered by emotional suppression and sudden outbursts, significantly threatens road safety by causing collisions and aggressive behavior.<n>Speech emotion recognition technologies can mitigate this risk by identifying negative emotions early and issuing timely alerts.<n>We propose a novel risk-controlled prediction framework providing statistically rigorous guarantees on prediction accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-24T12:26:28Z)
• CARIL: Confidence-Aware Regression in Imitation Learning for Autonomous Driving [0.0]
  End-to-end vision-based imitation learning has demonstrated promising results in autonomous driving.<n>Traditional approaches rely on either regressionbased models, which provide precise control but lack confidence estimation, or classification-based models, which offer confidence scores but suffer from reduced precision due to discretization.<n>We introduce a dual-head neural network architecture that integrates both regression and classification heads to improve decision reliability in imitation learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-02T08:19:02Z)
• The Over-Certainty Phenomenon in Modern Test-Time Adaptation Algorithms [8.210473195536077]
  We propose a solution that maintains accuracy and addresses calibration.<n>Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance in terms of Expected Error and Negative Log Likelihood.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T19:55:50Z)
• Revisiting Confidence Estimation: Towards Reliable Failure Prediction [53.79160907725975]
  We find a general, widely existing but actually-neglected phenomenon that most confidence estimation methods are harmful for detecting misclassification errors. We propose to enlarge the confidence gap by finding flat minima, which yields state-of-the-art failure prediction performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T11:44:14Z)
• Selective Learning: Towards Robust Calibration with Dynamic Regularization [79.92633587914659]
  Miscalibration in deep learning refers to there is a discrepancy between the predicted confidence and performance. We introduce Dynamic Regularization (DReg) which aims to learn what should be learned during training thereby circumventing the confidence adjusting trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T11:25:20Z)
• Sample-dependent Adaptive Temperature Scaling for Improved Calibration [95.7477042886242]
  Post-hoc approach to compensate for neural networks being wrong is to perform temperature scaling. We propose to predict a different temperature value for each input, allowing us to adjust the mismatch between confidence and accuracy. We test our method on the ResNet50 and WideResNet28-10 architectures using the CIFAR10/100 and Tiny-ImageNet datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-13T14:13:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.