Coverage-Guaranteed Speech Emotion Recognition via Calibrated Uncertainty-Adaptive Prediction Sets

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.22712v4
• Date: Wed, 07 May 2025 07:20:42 GMT
• Title: Coverage-Guaranteed Speech Emotion Recognition via Calibrated Uncertainty-Adaptive Prediction Sets
• Authors: Zijun Jia, Jinsong Yu, Hongyu Long, Diyin Tang,
• Abstract summary: Road rage, often triggered by emotional suppression and sudden outbursts, significantly threatens road safety by causing collisions and aggressive behavior.<n>Speech emotion recognition technologies can mitigate this risk by identifying negative emotions early and issuing timely alerts.<n>We propose a novel risk-controlled prediction framework providing statistically rigorous guarantees on prediction accuracy.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Road rage, often triggered by emotional suppression and sudden outbursts, significantly threatens road safety by causing collisions and aggressive behavior. Speech emotion recognition technologies can mitigate this risk by identifying negative emotions early and issuing timely alerts. However, current SER methods, such as those based on hidden markov models and Long short-term memory networks, primarily handle one-dimensional signals, frequently experience overfitting, and lack calibration, limiting their safety-critical effectiveness. We propose a novel risk-controlled prediction framework providing statistically rigorous guarantees on prediction accuracy. This approach employs a calibration set to define a binary loss function indicating whether the true label is included in the prediction set. Using a data-driven threshold $\beta$, we optimize a joint loss function to maintain an expected test loss bounded by a user-specified risk level $\alpha$. Evaluations across six baseline models and two benchmark datasets demonstrate our framework consistently achieves a minimum coverage of $1 - \alpha$, effectively controlling marginal error rates despite varying calibration-test split ratios (e.g., 0.1). The robustness and generalizability of the framework are further validated through an extension to small-batch online calibration under a local exchangeability assumption. We construct a non-negative test martingale to maintain prediction validity even in dynamic and non-exchangeable environments. Cross-dataset tests confirm our method's ability to uphold reliable statistical guarantees in realistic, evolving data scenarios.

Related papers

• Calibrated Prediction Set in Fault Detection with Risk Guarantees via Significance Tests [3.500936878570599]
  This paper proposes a novel fault detection method that integrates significance testing with the conformal prediction framework to provide formal risk guarantees.<n>The proposed method consistently achieves an empirical coverage rate at or above the nominal level ($1-alpha$)<n>The results reveal a controllable trade-off between the user-defined risk level ($alpha$) and efficiency, where higher risk tolerance leads to smaller average prediction set sizes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-02T05:49:02Z)
• Sample Margin-Aware Recalibration of Temperature Scaling [20.87493013833571]
  Recent advances in deep learning have significantly improved predictive accuracy.<n>Modern neural networks remain systematically overconfident, posing risks for deployment in safety-critical scenarios.<n>We propose a lightweight, data-efficient recalibration method that precisely scales logits based on the margin between the top two logits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T03:35:05Z)
• COIN: Uncertainty-Guarding Selective Question Answering for Foundation Models with Provable Risk Guarantees [51.5976496056012]
  COIN is an uncertainty-guarding selection framework that calibrates statistically valid thresholds to filter a single generated answer per question.<n>COIN estimates the empirical error rate on a calibration set and applies confidence interval methods to establish a high-probability upper bound on the true error rate.<n>We demonstrate COIN's robustness in risk control, strong test-time power in retaining admissible answers, and predictive efficiency under limited calibration data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-25T07:04:49Z)
• Conformal Segmentation in Industrial Surface Defect Detection with Statistical Guarantees [2.0257616108612373]
  In industrial settings, surface defects on steel can significantly compromise its service life and elevate potential safety risks.<n>Traditional defect detection methods predominantly rely on manual inspection, which suffers from low efficiency and high costs.<n>We develop a statistically rigorous threshold based on a user-defined risk level to identify high-probability defective pixels in test images.<n>We demonstrate robust and efficient control over the expected test set error rate across varying calibration-to-test ratios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-24T16:33:56Z)
• SConU: Selective Conformal Uncertainty in Large Language Models [59.25881667640868]
  We propose a novel approach termed Selective Conformal Uncertainty (SConU)<n>We develop two conformal p-values that are instrumental in determining whether a given sample deviates from the uncertainty distribution of the calibration set at a specific manageable risk level.<n>Our approach not only facilitates rigorous management of miscoverage rates across both single-domain and interdisciplinary contexts, but also enhances the efficiency of predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-19T03:01:45Z)
• Regression-Based Estimation of Causal Effects in the Presence of Selection Bias and Confounding [52.1068936424622]
  We consider the problem of estimating the expected causal effect $E[Y|do(X)]$ for a target variable $Y$ when treatment $X$ is set by intervention. In settings without selection bias or confounding, $E[Y|do(X)] = E[Y|X]$, which can be estimated using standard regression methods. We propose a framework that incorporates both selection bias and confounding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-26T13:43:37Z)
• PredictaBoard: Benchmarking LLM Score Predictability [50.47497036981544]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) often fail unpredictably.<n>This poses a significant challenge to ensuring their safe deployment.<n>We present PredictaBoard, a novel collaborative benchmarking framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T10:52:38Z)
• Robust Online Conformal Prediction under Uniform Label Noise [10.059818934854038]
  We investigate the robustness of online conformal prediction under uniform label noise with a known noise rate.<n>We propose Noise Robust Online Conformal Prediction (dubbed NR-OCP) by updating the threshold with a novel robust pinball loss.<n>Our theoretical analysis shows that NR-OCP eliminates the coverage gap in both constant and dynamic learning rate schedules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-30T14:08:26Z)
• Noise-Adaptive Conformal Classification with Marginal Coverage [53.74125453366155]
  We introduce an adaptive conformal inference method capable of efficiently handling deviations from exchangeability caused by random label noise.<n>We validate our method through extensive numerical experiments demonstrating its effectiveness on synthetic and real data sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-29T23:55:23Z)
• A Hybrid Framework for Statistical Feature Selection and Image-Based Noise-Defect Detection [55.2480439325792]
  This paper presents a hybrid framework that integrates both statistical feature selection and classification techniques to improve defect detection accuracy.<n>We present around 55 distinguished features that are extracted from industrial images, which are then analyzed using statistical methods.<n>By integrating these methods with flexible machine learning applications, the proposed framework improves detection accuracy and reduces false positives and misclassifications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-11T22:12:21Z)
• Integrating uncertainty quantification into randomized smoothing based robustness guarantees [18.572496359670797]
  Deep neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial attacks which can cause hazardous incorrect predictions in safety-critical applications. Certified robustness via randomized smoothing gives a probabilistic guarantee that the smoothed classifier's predictions will not change within an $ell$-ball around a given input. Uncertainty-based rejection is a technique often applied in practice to defend models against adversarial attacks. We demonstrate, that the novel framework allows for a systematic evaluation of different network architectures and uncertainty measures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-27T13:07:43Z)
• Provably Reliable Conformal Prediction Sets in the Presence of Data Poisoning [53.42244686183879]
  Conformal prediction provides model-agnostic and distribution-free uncertainty quantification.<n>Yet, conformal prediction is not reliable under poisoning attacks where adversaries manipulate both training and calibration data.<n>We propose reliable prediction sets (RPS): the first efficient method for constructing conformal prediction sets with provable reliability guarantees under poisoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-13T15:37:11Z)
• Online scalable Gaussian processes with conformal prediction for guaranteed coverage [32.21093722162573]
  The consistency of the resulting uncertainty values hinges on the premise that the learning function conforms to the properties specified by the GP model. We propose to wed the GP with the prevailing conformal prediction (CP), a distribution-free post-processing framework that produces it prediction sets with a provably valid coverage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T19:22:15Z)
• Spatial-Aware Conformal Prediction for Trustworthy Hyperspectral Image Classification [39.71307720326761]
  Hyperspectral image (HSI) classification involves assigning unique labels to each pixel to identify various land cover categories. Deep classifiers have achieved high predictive accuracy in this field, but they lack the ability to quantify confidence in their predictions. We introduce Spatial-Aware Conformal Prediction (textttSACP), a conformal prediction framework specifically designed for HSI data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-02T13:11:38Z)
• UAHOI: Uncertainty-aware Robust Interaction Learning for HOI Detection [18.25576487115016]
  This paper focuses on Human-Object Interaction (HOI) detection. It addresses the challenge of identifying and understanding the interactions between humans and objects within a given image or video frame. We propose a novel approach textscUAHOI, Uncertainty-aware Robust Human-Object Interaction Learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T10:06:39Z)
• Automatically Adaptive Conformal Risk Control [49.95190019041905]
  We propose a methodology for achieving approximate conditional control of statistical risks by adapting to the difficulty of test samples.<n>Our framework goes beyond traditional conditional risk control based on user-provided conditioning events to the algorithmic, data-driven determination of appropriate function classes for conditioning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T08:29:32Z)
• Verifiably Robust Conformal Prediction [1.391198481393699]
  This paper introduces VRCP (Verifiably Robust Conformal Prediction), a new framework that leverages neural network verification methods to recover coverage guarantees under adversarial attacks. Our method is the first to support perturbations bounded by arbitrary norms including $ell1$, $ell2$, and $ellinfty$, as well as regression tasks. In every case, VRCP achieves above nominal coverage and yields significantly more efficient and informative prediction regions than the SotA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T09:50:43Z)
• Provably Robust Conformal Prediction with Improved Efficiency [29.70455766394585]
  Conformal prediction is a powerful tool to generate uncertainty sets with guaranteed coverage. adversarial examples are able to manipulate conformal methods to construct prediction sets with invalid coverage rates. We propose two novel methods, Post-Training Transformation (PTT) and Robust Conformal Training (RCT), to effectively reduce prediction set size with little overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-30T15:49:01Z)
• Robust Conformal Prediction under Distribution Shift via Physics-Informed Structural Causal Model [24.58531056536442]
  Conformal prediction (CP) handles uncertainty by predicting a set on a test input. This coverage can be guaranteed on test data even if the marginal distributions $P_X$ differ between calibration and test datasets. We propose a physics-informed structural causal model (PI-SCM) to reduce the upper bound.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-22T08:13:33Z)
• Uncertainty-Calibrated Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgetting [55.17761802332469]
  Test-time adaptation (TTA) seeks to tackle potential distribution shifts between training and test data by adapting a given model w.r.t. any test sample. Prior methods perform backpropagation for each test sample, resulting in unbearable optimization costs to many applications. We propose an Efficient Anti-Forgetting Test-Time Adaptation (EATA) method which develops an active sample selection criterion to identify reliable and non-redundant samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-18T05:49:45Z)
• Conservative Prediction via Data-Driven Confidence Minimization [70.93946578046003]
  In safety-critical applications of machine learning, it is often desirable for a model to be conservative. We propose the Data-Driven Confidence Minimization framework, which minimizes confidence on an uncertainty dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T07:05:36Z)
• Bridging Precision and Confidence: A Train-Time Loss for Calibrating Object Detection [58.789823426981044]
  We propose a novel auxiliary loss formulation that aims to align the class confidence of bounding boxes with the accurateness of predictions. Our results reveal that our train-time loss surpasses strong calibration baselines in reducing calibration error for both in and out-domain scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-25T08:56:21Z)
• Lightweight, Uncertainty-Aware Conformalized Visual Odometry [2.429910016019183]
  Data-driven visual odometry (VO) is a critical subroutine for autonomous edge robotics. Emerging edge robotics devices like insect-scale drones and surgical robots lack a computationally efficient framework to estimate VO's predictive uncertainties. This paper presents a novel, lightweight, and statistically robust framework that leverages conformal inference (CI) to extract VO's uncertainty bands.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-03T20:37:55Z)
• Confidence Calibration for Intent Detection via Hyperspherical Space and Rebalanced Accuracy-Uncertainty Loss [17.26964140836123]
  In some scenarios, users do not only care about the accuracy but also the confidence of model. We propose a model using the hyperspherical space and rebalanced accuracy-uncertainty loss. Our model outperforms the existing calibration methods and achieves a significant improvement on the calibration metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-17T12:01:33Z)
• Tail-to-Tail Non-Autoregressive Sequence Prediction for Chinese Grammatical Error Correction [49.25830718574892]
  We present a new framework named Tail-to-Tail (textbfTtT) non-autoregressive sequence prediction. Considering that most tokens are correct and can be conveyed directly from source to target, and the error positions can be estimated and corrected. Experimental results on standard datasets, especially on the variable-length datasets, demonstrate the effectiveness of TtT in terms of sentence-level Accuracy, Precision, Recall, and F1-Measure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-03T05:56:57Z)
• Learning Uncertainty For Safety-Oriented Semantic Segmentation In Autonomous Driving [77.39239190539871]
  We show how uncertainty estimation can be leveraged to enable safety critical image segmentation in autonomous driving. We introduce a new uncertainty measure based on disagreeing predictions as measured by a dissimilarity function. We show experimentally that our proposed approach is much less computationally intensive at inference time than competing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-28T09:23:05Z)
• Distribution-free uncertainty quantification for classification under label shift [105.27463615756733]
  We focus on uncertainty quantification (UQ) for classification problems via two avenues. We first argue that label shift hurts UQ, by showing degradation in coverage and calibration. We examine these techniques theoretically in a distribution-free framework and demonstrate their excellent practical performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-04T20:51:03Z)
• Privacy Preserving Recalibration under Domain Shift [119.21243107946555]
  We introduce a framework that abstracts out the properties of recalibration problems under differential privacy constraints. We also design a novel recalibration algorithm, accuracy temperature scaling, that outperforms prior work on private datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-21T18:43:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.