A Causal Argumentation Method for Explainability of Machine Learning Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21758v1
• Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 21:40:44 GMT
• Title: A Causal Argumentation Method for Explainability of Machine Learning Models
• Abstract summary: We present a novel method that integrates causality with argument-based reasoning to explain why models may be making predictions.<n>Our approach first identifies causal relationships among variables using causal discovery methods.<n>We find extensions of features that explain why certain outcomes may have been chosen.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Explainable AI (XAI) methods identify which features are relevant to a model's predictions but often fail to clarify why certain decisions are made. In this work, we present a novel method that integrates causality with argument-based reasoning to explain why models may be making predictions. Our approach first identifies causal relationships among variables using causal discovery methods and then translates these into a Bipolar Argumentation Framework (BAF) to represent supportive and opposing interactions among features. By using semi-stable semantics, we find extensions of features that explain why certain outcomes may have been chosen. We demonstrate our method on two benchmark datasets and compare its results against standard post-hoc explainability approaches.

Related papers

• Relational Structural Causal Models [52.818153111470394]
  We develop relational structural causal models, extending structural causal models to settings where objects and their relations vary.<n>We propose relational neural causal models, a provably correct approach that outperforms non-relational baselines on simulated traffic scenes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-12T18:54:06Z)
• Internal Causal Mechanisms Robustly Predict Language Model Out-of-Distribution Behaviors [61.92704516732144]
  We show that the most robust features for correctness prediction are those that play a distinctive causal role in the model's behavior.<n>We propose two methods that leverage causal mechanisms to predict the correctness of model outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-17T00:31:39Z)
• Counterfactual explainability and analysis of variance [3.4895986723227383]
  Existing tools for explaining complex models and systems are associational rather than causal.<n>We propose a new notion called counterfactual explainability for causal attribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-03T16:29:09Z)
• Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown Interventions [63.1354734978244]
  We study causal representation learning, the task of inferring latent causal variables and their causal relations from mixtures of the variables. Our goal is to identify both the ground truth latents and their causal graph up to a set of ambiguities which we show to be irresolvable from interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T10:51:58Z)
• Identifying Weight-Variant Latent Causal Models [82.14087963690561]
  We find that transitivity acts as a key role in impeding the identifiability of latent causal representations. Under some mild assumptions, we can show that the latent causal representations can be identified up to trivial permutation and scaling. We propose a novel method, termed Structural caUsAl Variational autoEncoder, which directly learns latent causal representations and causal relationships among them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-30T11:12:59Z)
• Explaining Causal Models with Argumentation: the Case of Bi-variate Reinforcement [15.947501347927687]
  We introduce a conceptualisation for generating argumentation frameworks (AFs) from causal models. The conceptualisation is based on reinterpreting desirable properties of semantics of AFs as explanation moulds. We perform a theoretical evaluation of these argumentative explanations, examining whether they satisfy a range of desirable explanatory and argumentative properties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T19:39:51Z)
• Argumentative Explanations for Pattern-Based Text Classifiers [15.81939090849456]
  We focus on explanations for a specific interpretable model, namely pattern-based logistic regression (PLR) for binary text classification. We propose AXPLR, a novel explanation method using (forms of) computational argumentation to generate explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-22T21:16:49Z)
• Estimation of Bivariate Structural Causal Models by Variational Gaussian Process Regression Under Likelihoods Parametrised by Normalising Flows [74.85071867225533]
  Causal mechanisms can be described by structural causal models. One major drawback of state-of-the-art artificial intelligence is its lack of explainability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-06T14:52:58Z)
• Contrastive Explanations for Model Interpretability [77.92370750072831]
  We propose a methodology to produce contrastive explanations for classification models. Our method is based on projecting model representation to a latent space. Our findings shed light on the ability of label-contrastive explanations to provide a more accurate and finer-grained interpretability of a model's decision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-02T00:36:45Z)
• Latent Causal Invariant Model [128.7508609492542]
  Current supervised learning can learn spurious correlation during the data-fitting process. We propose a Latent Causal Invariance Model (LaCIM) which pursues causal prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-04T10:00:27Z)
• Latent Instrumental Variables as Priors in Causal Inference based on Independence of Cause and Mechanism [2.28438857884398]
  We study the role of latent variables such as latent instrumental variables and hidden common causes in the causal graphical structures. We derive a novel algorithm to infer causal relationships between two variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-17T08:18:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.