Cultural Adaptation in Large Language Models for Political Discourse

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23332v1
• Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 07:45:50 GMT
• Title: Cultural Adaptation in Large Language Models for Political Discourse
• Abstract summary: This paper argues that cultural adaptation is a prerequisite for trustworthy deployment of large language models in political communication.<n>Current systems remain shaped by English dominant data, uneven multilingual coverage, and assumptions grounded in a narrow range of political institutions and discourse conventions.
• Score: 0.7734073750595959
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The integration of large language models into political discourse analysis creates new opportunities for comparative research, policy analysis, and civic technology, while introducing material risks for democratic accountability. This paper argues that cultural adaptation is a prerequisite for trustworthy deployment of large language models in political communication across diverse linguistic and institutional contexts. Current systems remain shaped by English dominant data, uneven multilingual coverage, and assumptions grounded in a narrow range of political institutions and discourse conventions, producing systematic errors when applied across cultures. We formalize cultural adaptation across translation, discourse, and ontology levels, identify recurring cultural failure modes in political NLP, and propose an operational evaluation matrix grounded in cultural fidelity, calibration, and democratic safety. Building on political text analysis, sociotechnical auditing, and cross cultural pragmatics, we outline methodological pathways including participatory dataset development, culturally aware transfer learning, and benchmark design that makes cultural adaptation empirically measurable. We conclude by clarifying governance constraints and scope conditions under which culturally adaptive political NLP can support democratic legitimacy.

Related papers

• Plurification in/of language technology -- The integration of culture in next-generation AI [20.03173576053809]
  The paper explores how "culture" can be operationalised in Natural Language Processing (NLP)<n>It proposes that cultural alignment cannot be achieved only by adding more examples of "other cultures"<n>The paper concludes that operationalising culture requires much more than technical adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-20T15:24:14Z)
• Toward Culturally Grounded Natural Language Processing [0.33842793760651557]
  This paper synthesizes over 50 papers spanning multilingual performance inequality, cross-lingual transfer, culture-aware evaluation, cultural alignment, and benchmark design critiques.<n>We argue that the field should move from treating languages as isolated rows in a benchmark spreadsheet toward modeling communicative ecologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-27T02:08:32Z)
• Culturally-Grounded Governance for Multilingual Language Models: Rights, Data Boundaries, and Accountable AI Design [2.5424331328233207]
  This paper synthesizes existing evidence on multilingual model behavior, data asymmetries, and sociotechnical harm.<n>We identify three interrelated governance challenges: cultural and linguistic inequities in training data and evaluation practices, misalignment between global deployment and locally situated norms, values, and power structures, and limited accountability mechanisms for addressing harms experienced by marginalized language communities.<n>We argue that culturally grounded governance is essential for ensuring that multilingual language models do not reproduce existing global inequalities under the guise of scale and neutrality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-31T03:47:30Z)
• MMA-ASIA: A Multilingual and Multimodal Alignment Framework for Culturally-Grounded Evaluation [91.22008265721952]
  MMA-ASIA centers on a human-curated, multilingual, and multimodally aligned benchmark covering 8 Asian countries and 10 languages.<n>This is the first dataset aligned at the input level across three modalities: text, image (visual question answering), and speech.<n>We propose a five-dimensional evaluation protocol that measures: (i) cultural-awareness disparities across countries, (ii) cross-lingual consistency, (iii) cross-modal consistency, (iv) cultural knowledge generalization, and (v) grounding validity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-07T14:12:12Z)
• Framing Political Bias in Multilingual LLMs Across Pakistani Languages [6.5137518437747]
  We present a systematic evaluation of political bias in 13 state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs) across five Pakistani languages.<n>Our framework integrates a culturally adapted Political Compass Test (PCT) with multi-level framing analysis.<n>Results show that while LLMs predominantly reflect liberal-left orientations consistent with Western training data, they exhibit more authoritarian framing in regional languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T15:15:42Z)
• From Word to World: Evaluate and Mitigate Culture Bias in LLMs via Word Association Test [50.51344198689069]
  We extend the human-centered word association test (WAT) to assess the alignment of large language models with cross-cultural cognition.<n>To address culture preference, we propose CultureSteer, an innovative approach by embedding cultural-specific semantic associations directly within the model's internal representation space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T07:05:10Z)
• Cultural Learning-Based Culture Adaptation of Language Models [70.1063219524999]
  Adapting large language models (LLMs) to diverse cultural values is a challenging task.<n>We present CLCA, a novel framework for enhancing LLM alignment with cultural values based on cultural learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-03T18:16:26Z)
• Political-LLM: Large Language Models in Political Science [159.95299889946637]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been widely adopted in political science tasks.<n>Political-LLM aims to advance the comprehensive understanding of integrating LLMs into computational political science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-09T08:47:50Z)
• Extrinsic Evaluation of Cultural Competence in Large Language Models [53.626808086522985]
  We focus on extrinsic evaluation of cultural competence in two text generation tasks. We evaluate model outputs when an explicit cue of culture, specifically nationality, is perturbed in the prompts. We find weak correlations between text similarity of outputs for different countries and the cultural values of these countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T14:03:27Z)
• Massively Multi-Cultural Knowledge Acquisition & LM Benchmarking [48.21982147529661]
  This paper introduces a novel approach for massively multicultural knowledge acquisition. Our method strategically navigates from densely informative Wikipedia documents on cultural topics to an extensive network of linked pages. Our work marks an important step towards deeper understanding and bridging the gaps of cultural disparities in AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T18:16:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.