Plurification in/of language technology -- The integration of culture in next-generation AI
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.22097v1
- Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2026 15:24:14 GMT
- Title: Plurification in/of language technology -- The integration of culture in next-generation AI
- Abstract summary: The paper explores how "culture" can be operationalised in Natural Language Processing (NLP)<n>It proposes that cultural alignment cannot be achieved only by adding more examples of "other cultures"<n>The paper concludes that operationalising culture requires much more than technical adaptation.
- Score: 20.03173576053809
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The paper explores how "culture" can be operationalised in Natural Language Processing (NLP) and what this reveals about the possibilities and limits of considering a plurality of cultural backgrounds in technological design. It proposes that cultural alignment cannot be achieved only by adding more examples of "other cultures", rather it requires plural epistemologies: allowing multiple, locally grounded ways of knowing. To analyze how this plurality of knowing can be addressed in NLP, the paper uses a socio-technical model of language technology (LT) design, the five layers of technological activity model, for collecting and systematizing approaches to culture in NLP. The analysis shows that while NLP research has made progress toward more culturally sensitive systems, many approaches remain partial, addressing "culture" primarily at the level of output or representation while leaving deeper questions of power, governance, and social context unresolved. The paper concludes that operationalising culture requires much more than technical adaptation; it suggests a reflexive and plural socio-technical approach that navigates potentials and limits of computational formalisation for accounting multiple linguistic and socio-cultural backgrounds.
Related papers
- Cultural Adaptation in Large Language Models for Political Discourse [0.7734073750595959]
This paper argues that cultural adaptation is a prerequisite for trustworthy deployment of large language models in political communication.<n>Current systems remain shaped by English dominant data, uneven multilingual coverage, and assumptions grounded in a narrow range of political institutions and discourse conventions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-22T07:45:50Z) - Defining Cultural Capabilities for AI Evaluation: A Taxonomy Grounded in Intercultural Communication Theory [6.132870531764035]
We propose a three-level taxonomy of AI-relevant cultural capabilities.<n>We position this taxonomy as a practical tool for improving the validity and interpretability of AI evaluation in real-world, multicultural settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-15T14:21:52Z) - LLMs as Cultural Archives: Cultural Commonsense Knowledge Graph Extraction [57.23766971626989]
Large language models (LLMs) encode rich cultural knowledge learned from diverse web-scale data.<n>We present an iterative, prompt-based framework for constructing a Cultural Commonsense Knowledge Graph (CCKG)<n>We find that the cultural knowledge graphs are better realized in English, even when the target culture is non-English.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-25T20:05:04Z) - Do Large Language Models Truly Understand Cross-cultural Differences? [53.481048019144644]
We develop a scenario-based benchmark to evaluate large language models' cross-cultural understanding and reasoning.<n>Grounded in cultural theory, we categorize cross-cultural capabilities into nine dimensions.<n>The dataset supports continuous expansion, and experiments confirm its transferability to other languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-08T01:21:58Z) - 'Too much alignment; not enough culture': Re-balancing cultural alignment practices in LLMs [0.0]
This paper argues for a shift towards integrating qualitative approaches into AI alignment practices.<n> Drawing inspiration from Clifford Geertz's concept of "thick description," we propose that AI systems must produce outputs that reflect deeper cultural meanings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-30T12:22:53Z) - CultureScope: A Dimensional Lens for Probing Cultural Understanding in LLMs [57.653830744706305]
CultureScope is the most comprehensive evaluation framework to date for assessing cultural understanding in large language models.<n>Inspired by the cultural iceberg theory, we design a novel dimensional schema for cultural knowledge classification.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that our method can effectively evaluate cultural understanding.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-19T17:47:48Z) - From Word to World: Evaluate and Mitigate Culture Bias in LLMs via Word Association Test [50.51344198689069]
We extend the human-centered word association test (WAT) to assess the alignment of large language models with cross-cultural cognition.<n>To address culture preference, we propose CultureSteer, an innovative approach by embedding cultural-specific semantic associations directly within the model's internal representation space.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-24T07:05:10Z) - Culture is Not Trivia: Sociocultural Theory for Cultural NLP [10.76392030245232]
We argue that these methodological limitations are symptomatic of a theoretical gap.<n>We draw on a well-developed theory of culture from sociocultural linguistics to fill this gap.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-17T17:25:11Z) - Extrinsic Evaluation of Cultural Competence in Large Language Models [53.626808086522985]
We focus on extrinsic evaluation of cultural competence in two text generation tasks.
We evaluate model outputs when an explicit cue of culture, specifically nationality, is perturbed in the prompts.
We find weak correlations between text similarity of outputs for different countries and the cultural values of these countries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-17T14:03:27Z) - Culturally Aware and Adapted NLP: A Taxonomy and a Survey of the State of the Art [70.1063219524999]
The surge of interest in "culture" in NLP has inspired much recent research, but a shared understanding of "culture" remains unclear.<n>We propose a fine-grained taxonomy of elements in culture that can provide a systematic framework for analyzing and understanding research progress.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-06T10:16:43Z) - Massively Multi-Cultural Knowledge Acquisition & LM Benchmarking [48.21982147529661]
This paper introduces a novel approach for massively multicultural knowledge acquisition.
Our method strategically navigates from densely informative Wikipedia documents on cultural topics to an extensive network of linked pages.
Our work marks an important step towards deeper understanding and bridging the gaps of cultural disparities in AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-14T18:16:54Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.