DDX-TRACE: A Benchmark for Medical Diagnostic Trajectories in VLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23629v1
• Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 13:41:10 GMT
• Title: DDX-TRACE: A Benchmark for Medical Diagnostic Trajectories in VLMs
• Abstract summary: Most medical AI benchmarks reveal the relevant context upfront and score only the final answer.<n>We introduce DDX-TRACE, a physician-adjudicated benchmark for multimodal neuroradiology.<n>It evaluates diagnostic trajectories under hidden evidence over 211 challenging cases.
• Score: 21.52456139726765
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Medical diagnosis is not a single prediction from a fully specified vignette. It is a sequential workup: clinicians decide what evidence to obtain, revise a differential diagnosis, and stop when the diagnosis is sufficiently supported. Most medical AI benchmarks instead reveal the relevant context upfront and score only the final answer, making unsupported correct guesses, premature closure, inefficient workups, and poor uncertainty updating invisible. We introduce DDX-TRACE, a physician-adjudicated benchmark for multimodal neuroradiology that evaluates diagnostic trajectories under hidden evidence over 211 challenging cases. Each case begins with limited clinical history; models request imaging studies in free form, receive matched image bundles when available, update a probabilistic differential diagnosis after each turn, and stop with a localized final diagnosis. Evaluating state-of-the-art VLMs, we find that final diagnosis scores can substantially misrepresent workup quality: models may guess plausible diagnoses without essential evidence, request useful studies but misinterpret raw images, or acquire evidence inefficiently while updating uncertainty poorly. Controlled evidence variants isolate bottlenecks in planning, visual evidence extraction, and downstream differential reasoning. DDX-TRACE shifts medical AI evaluation from final answers to evidence-supported diagnostic trajectories.

Related papers

• CDEG: Learning Decision-Critical Evidence for Long-Horizon Diagnostic Agents [21.40725112789917]
  We introduce CDEG, a graph-based framework that learns reusable decision-critical evidence from historical diagnostic trajectories.<n>We show that CDEG consistently improves diagnostic performance, achieving up to an 11.5% accuracy gain over vanilla agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-24T07:30:22Z)
• MedReaMM: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models on Expert-Level Clinical Diagnostic Synthesis [61.266743965495884]
  We introduce MedReaMM, a benchmark designed to evaluate models' ability to synthesize heterogeneous clinical evidence.<n>MedReaMM comprises 625 expert-validated cases with an average of 2.79 medical images per case and a total of 1,042 standardized diagnoses annotated with ICD-11 codes.<n>We evaluate 23 Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) and find that most achieve diagnostic accuracy scores below 50%, underscoring a substantial gap in multimodal diagnostic synthesis capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-23T09:37:53Z)
• Evaluating Multi-Turn Multimodal Diagnostic Reasoning on Challenging Real-World Clinical Cases [59.5328455571863]
  ClinMM-Bench is the largest multi-turn multimodal clinical diagnostic evaluation benchmark to date.<n>It contains 1,089 challenging real-world clinical cases and 3,760 medical images across eight specialties.<n> proprietary models achieved the highest overall diagnostic accuracy, but the proportion of completely correct diagnoses remained limited.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-28T16:19:03Z)
• MultiDx: A Multi-Source Knowledge Integration Framework towards Diagnostic Reasoning [66.94527468532843]
  We propose MultiDx, a two-stage diagnostic reasoning framework.<n>It first generates suspected diagnoses and reasoning paths by leveraging knowledge from web search, SOAP-formatted case, and clinical case database.<n>Then it integrates multi-perspective evidence through matching, voting, and differential diagnosis to generate the final prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-27T08:46:29Z)
• RAD: Towards Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Multi-modal Clinical Diagnosis [56.373297358647655]
  Retrieval-Augmented Diagnosis (RAD) is a novel framework that injects external knowledge into multimodal models directly on downstream tasks.<n>RAD operates through three key mechanisms: retrieval and refinement of disease-centered knowledge from multiple medical sources, a guideline-enhanced contrastive loss transformer, and a dual decoder.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-24T10:36:14Z)
• End-to-End Agentic RAG System Training for Traceable Diagnostic Reasoning [52.12425911708585]
  Deep-DxSearch is an agentic RAG system trained end-to-end with reinforcement learning (RL)<n>In Deep-DxSearch, we first construct a large-scale medical retrieval corpus comprising patient records and reliable medical knowledge sources.<n> Experiments demonstrate that our end-to-end RL training framework consistently outperforms prompt-engineering and training-free RAG approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-21T17:42:47Z)
• Sequential Diagnosis with Language Models [21.22416732642907]
  We introduce the Sequential Diagnosis Benchmark, which transforms 304 diagnostically challenging cases into stepwise diagnostic encounters.<n>Performance is assessed not just by diagnostic accuracy but also by the cost of physician visits and tests performed.<n>We also present the MAI Diagnostic Orchestrator (MAI-DxO), a model-agnostic orchestrator that simulates a panel of physicians.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-27T17:27:26Z)
• Towards Reducing Diagnostic Errors with Interpretable Risk Prediction [18.474645862061426]
  We propose a method to use LLMs to identify pieces of evidence in patient EHR data that indicate increased or decreased risk of specific diagnoses. Our ultimate aim is to increase access to evidence and reduce diagnostic errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T17:05:48Z)
• Towards the Identifiability and Explainability for Personalized Learner Modeling: An Inductive Paradigm [36.60917255464867]
  We propose an identifiable cognitive diagnosis framework (ID-CDF) based on a novel response-proficiency-response paradigm inspired by encoder-decoder models. We show that ID-CDF can effectively address the problems without loss of diagnosis preciseness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-01T07:18:02Z)
• Xplainer: From X-Ray Observations to Explainable Zero-Shot Diagnosis [36.45569352490318]
  We introduce Xplainer, a framework for explainable zero-shot diagnosis in the clinical setting. Xplainer adapts the classification-by-description approach of contrastive vision-language models to the multi-label medical diagnosis task. Our results suggest that Xplainer provides a more detailed understanding of the decision-making process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-23T16:07:31Z)
• DxFormer: A Decoupled Automatic Diagnostic System Based on Decoder-Encoder Transformer with Dense Symptom Representations [26.337392652262103]
  A diagnosis-oriented dialogue system queries the patient's health condition and makes predictions about possible diseases through continuous interaction with the patient. We propose a decoupled automatic diagnostic framework DxFormer, which divides the diagnosis process into two steps: symptom inquiry and disease diagnosis. Our proposed model can effectively learn doctors' clinical experience and achieve the state-of-the-art results in terms of symptom recall and diagnostic accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-08T01:52:42Z)
• Towards Causality-Aware Inferring: A Sequential Discriminative Approach for Medical Diagnosis [142.90770786804507]
  Medical diagnosis assistant (MDA) aims to build an interactive diagnostic agent to sequentially inquire about symptoms for discriminating diseases. This work attempts to address these critical issues in MDA by taking advantage of the causal diagram. We propose a propensity-based patient simulator to effectively answer unrecorded inquiry by drawing knowledge from the other records.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-14T02:05:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.