Towards Reducing Diagnostic Errors with Interpretable Risk Prediction
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.10109v2
- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 16:43:09 GMT
- Title: Towards Reducing Diagnostic Errors with Interpretable Risk Prediction
- Authors: Denis Jered McInerney, William Dickinson, Lucy C. Flynn, Andrea C. Young, Geoffrey S. Young, Jan-Willem van de Meent, Byron C. Wallace,
- Abstract summary: We propose a method to use LLMs to identify pieces of evidence in patient EHR data that indicate increased or decreased risk of specific diagnoses.
Our ultimate aim is to increase access to evidence and reduce diagnostic errors.
- Score: 18.474645862061426
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Many diagnostic errors occur because clinicians cannot easily access relevant information in patient Electronic Health Records (EHRs). In this work we propose a method to use LLMs to identify pieces of evidence in patient EHR data that indicate increased or decreased risk of specific diagnoses; our ultimate aim is to increase access to evidence and reduce diagnostic errors. In particular, we propose a Neural Additive Model to make predictions backed by evidence with individualized risk estimates at time-points where clinicians are still uncertain, aiming to specifically mitigate delays in diagnosis and errors stemming from an incomplete differential. To train such a model, it is necessary to infer temporally fine-grained retrospective labels of eventual "true" diagnoses. We do so with LLMs, to ensure that the input text is from before a confident diagnosis can be made. We use an LLM to retrieve an initial pool of evidence, but then refine this set of evidence according to correlations learned by the model. We conduct an in-depth evaluation of the usefulness of our approach by simulating how it might be used by a clinician to decide between a pre-defined list of differential diagnoses.
Related papers
- MINDSETS: Multi-omics Integration with Neuroimaging for Dementia Subtyping and Effective Temporal Study [0.7751705157998379]
Alzheimer's disease (AD) and vascular dementia (VaD) are the two most prevalent dementia types.
This paper presents an innovative multi-omics approach to accurately differentiate AD from VaD, achieving a diagnostic accuracy of 89.25%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-06T10:13:28Z) - Unified Uncertainty Estimation for Cognitive Diagnosis Models [70.46998436898205]
We propose a unified uncertainty estimation approach for a wide range of cognitive diagnosis models.
We decompose the uncertainty of diagnostic parameters into data aspect and model aspect.
Our method is effective and can provide useful insights into the uncertainty of cognitive diagnosis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-09T13:48:20Z) - CPLLM: Clinical Prediction with Large Language Models [0.07083082555458872]
We present a method that involves fine-tuning a pre-trained Large Language Model (LLM) for clinical disease and readmission prediction.
For diagnosis prediction, we predict whether patients will be diagnosed with a target disease during their next visit or in the subsequent diagnosis, leveraging their historical diagnosis records.
Our experiments have shown that our proposed method, CPLLM, surpasses all the tested models in terms of PR-AUC and ROC-AUC metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-20T13:24:12Z) - Diagnosis Uncertain Models For Medical Risk Prediction [80.07192791931533]
We consider a patient risk model which has access to vital signs, lab values, and prior history but does not have access to a patient's diagnosis.
We show that such all-cause' risk models have good generalization across diagnoses but have a predictable failure mode.
We propose a fix for this problem by explicitly modeling the uncertainty in risk prediction coming from uncertainty in patient diagnoses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-29T23:36:04Z) - Deep Reinforcement Learning Framework for Thoracic Diseases
Classification via Prior Knowledge Guidance [49.87607548975686]
The scarcity of labeled data for related diseases poses a huge challenge to an accurate diagnosis.
We propose a novel deep reinforcement learning framework, which introduces prior knowledge to direct the learning of diagnostic agents.
Our approach's performance was demonstrated using the well-known NIHX-ray 14 and CheXpert datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-02T01:46:31Z) - Xplainer: From X-Ray Observations to Explainable Zero-Shot Diagnosis [36.45569352490318]
We introduce Xplainer, a framework for explainable zero-shot diagnosis in the clinical setting.
Xplainer adapts the classification-by-description approach of contrastive vision-language models to the multi-label medical diagnosis task.
Our results suggest that Xplainer provides a more detailed understanding of the decision-making process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-23T16:07:31Z) - Clinical Outcome Prediction from Admission Notes using Self-Supervised
Knowledge Integration [55.88616573143478]
Outcome prediction from clinical text can prevent doctors from overlooking possible risks.
Diagnoses at discharge, procedures performed, in-hospital mortality and length-of-stay prediction are four common outcome prediction targets.
We propose clinical outcome pre-training to integrate knowledge about patient outcomes from multiple public sources.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-08T10:26:44Z) - Inheritance-guided Hierarchical Assignment for Clinical Automatic
Diagnosis [50.15205065710629]
Clinical diagnosis, which aims to assign diagnosis codes for a patient based on the clinical note, plays an essential role in clinical decision-making.
We propose a novel framework to combine the inheritance-guided hierarchical assignment and co-occurrence graph propagation for clinical automatic diagnosis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-27T13:16:51Z) - Uncertainty aware and explainable diagnosis of retinal disease [0.0]
We perform uncertainty analysis of a deep learning model for diagnosis of four retinal diseases.
We show the features that a system used to make prediction while uncertainty awareness is the ability of a system to highlight when it is not sure about the decision.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-26T23:37:30Z) - Query-Focused EHR Summarization to Aid Imaging Diagnosis [22.21438906817433]
We propose and evaluate models that extract relevant text snippets from patient records to provide a rough case summary.
We use groups of International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes observed in 'future' records as noisy proxies for 'downstream' diagnoses.
We train (via distant supervision) and evaluate variants of this model on EHR data from Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston and MIMIC-III.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-09T16:32:39Z) - Towards Causality-Aware Inferring: A Sequential Discriminative Approach
for Medical Diagnosis [142.90770786804507]
Medical diagnosis assistant (MDA) aims to build an interactive diagnostic agent to sequentially inquire about symptoms for discriminating diseases.
This work attempts to address these critical issues in MDA by taking advantage of the causal diagram.
We propose a propensity-based patient simulator to effectively answer unrecorded inquiry by drawing knowledge from the other records.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-14T02:05:54Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.