SPACENUM: Revisiting Spatial Numerical Understanding in VLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23898v1
• Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 17:58:36 GMT
• Title: SPACENUM: Revisiting Spatial Numerical Understanding in VLMs
• Abstract summary: We study whether Vision-Language Models (VLMs) truly understand numerical values in spatial settings.<n>Across dynamic transitions and static layouts, we find that models largely fail to ground numbers in spatial meaning.<n>We show that explicit reasoning provides only marginal gains, while tuning can partially improve spatial numerical understanding.
• Score: 14.025058020258816
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly deployed in embodied environments, where they need produce numerical outputs such as action magnitudes and spatial coordinates. Although these numbers appear meaningful, it remains unclear whether these numerical outputs are genuinely grounded in spatial perception. Therefore, in this work, we revisit spatial numerical understanding through SpaceNum, a unified framework that captures two complementary settings: numbers as dynamic transitions during spatial exploration, and numbers as static layouts in spatial reasoning. We formulate two bidirectional tasks, Num2Space and Space2Num, to evaluate how well VLMs map between vision-side spatial structure and language-side numerical representations. We systematically study whether current VLMs truly understand numerical values in spatial settings. Across dynamic transitions and static layouts, we find that models largely fail to ground numbers in spatial meaning and often perform close to random guess. Through error analysis, reasoning trace analysis, and controlled interventions, we show that current VLMs rely heavily on shallow spatial cues, struggle to build stable coordinate-aware representations, and fail to abstract structured spatial layouts from visual observations. We further show that explicit reasoning provides only marginal gains, while tuning can partially improve spatial numerical understanding and transfer to external spatial reasoning benchmarks.

Related papers

• SpaceEra++: A Unified Framework Towards 3D Spatial Reasoning in Video [88.79625979053873]
  We propose a novel framework, SpaceEra, for pre-trained vision-language models (VLMs)<n>We extend the original framework into a comprehensive system, termed SpaceEra++, which spans data construction, model design, training optimization, and prompting inference.<n>In addition, to enhance spatial reasoning, we develop SpaceAlign, which enforces pairwise object constraints by jointly exploiting absolute coordinates and relative spatial relations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-02T06:56:29Z)
• VEGA: Visual Encoder Grounding Alignment for Spatially-Aware Vision-Language-Action Models [55.12929235609365]
  Visual backbones of current vision-language-action (VLA) models are predominantly pretrained on 2D image data without explicit 3D geometric supervision.<n>Existing implicit grounding methods partially address this by aligning VLA features with those of 3D-aware foundation models.<n>We propose VEGA, a framework that directly aligns the output of the VLA's visual encoder with spatially-aware features from DINOv2-FiT3D.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-11T12:44:26Z)
• Uncovering and Shaping the Latent Representation of 3D Scene Topology in Vision-Language Models [9.722829662835233]
  We show that modern Vision-Language Models (VLMs) possess a latent topological map of 3D scenes.<n>By isolating this spatial subspace through cross-scene linear feature extraction, we extract a clean spatial subspace that causally controls the model's spatial outputs.<n>We mathematically shape this latent representation and prove its correspondence to the Laplacian eigenmaps of the scene's 3D Gaussian- kernel graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-08T02:32:27Z)
• Multimodal Spatial Reasoning in the Large Model Era: A Survey and Benchmarks [108.15756345836901]
  We provide a comprehensive review of multimodal spatial reasoning tasks with large models.<n>We review advances in embodied AI, including vision-language navigation and action models.<n>We consider emerging modalities such as audio and egocentric video, which contribute to novel spatial understanding through new sensors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-29T17:55:43Z)
• Spatial Reasoning in Foundation Models: Benchmarking Object-Centric Spatial Understanding [8.202861909913791]
  We present a benchmark for object-centric spatial reasoning in foundation models.<n>We find a stable trade-off: detectors such as GroundingDINO and OWLv2 deliver precise boxes with limited relational reasoning.<n>Our study highlights the gap between localization and true spatial understanding, and pointing toward the need for spatially-aware foundation models in the community.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T06:06:19Z)
• LRR-Bench: Left, Right or Rotate? Vision-Language models Still Struggle With Spatial Understanding Tasks [22.011855291417856]
  It remains underexplored how Vision-Language Models (VLMs) recognize spatial relationships and perceive spatial movement.<n>In this work, we introduce a spatial evaluation pipeline and construct a corresponding benchmark.<n>We conduct experiments on multiple state-of-the-art VLMs and observe that there is significant room for improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-27T08:31:24Z)
• FloorplanQA: A Benchmark for Spatial Reasoning in LLMs using Structured Representations [78.65988445433844]
  FloorplanQA is a diagnostic benchmark for evaluating spatial reasoning in large-language models.<n>The benchmark covers core spatial tasks, including distance measurement, visibility, path finding, and object placement within constrained spaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T11:16:48Z)
• Mind the Gap: Benchmarking Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models [14.442394137843923]
  We present a detailed analysis that first delineates the core elements of spatial reasoning.<n>We then assesses the performance of these models in both synthetic and real-world images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-25T14:34:06Z)
• Why Is Spatial Reasoning Hard for VLMs? An Attention Mechanism Perspective on Focus Areas [69.56484419619919]
  We study the spatial reasoning challenge from the lens of mechanistic interpretability.<n>We observe that successful spatial reasoning correlates strongly with the model's ability to align its attention with actual object locations.<n>Motivated by these findings, we propose ADAPTVIS to sharpen the attention on highly relevant regions when confident.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T17:57:03Z)
• Sparkle: Mastering Basic Spatial Capabilities in Vision Language Models Elicits Generalization to Spatial Reasoning [36.588008658084895]
  Vision language models (VLMs) perform well on many tasks but often fail at spatial reasoning.<n>Our evaluation shows that state-of-the-art VLMs give implausible or incorrect answers to composite spatial problems.<n>We enhance 2D spatial reasoning in VLMs by training them only on basic spatial capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T16:26:09Z)
• SpatialRGPT: Grounded Spatial Reasoning in Vision Language Models [68.13636352687257]
  We introduce Spatial Region GPT (SpatialRGPT) to enhance VLMs' spatial perception and reasoning capabilities. During inference, when provided with user-specified region proposals, SpatialRGPT can accurately perceive their relative directions and distances. Our results demonstrate that SpatialRGPT significantly enhances performance in spatial reasoning tasks, both with and without local region prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-03T17:59:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.