LLM-as-a-Judge in Healthcare: A Scoping Analysis of Applications, Methods, and Human Alignment
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.25273v1
- Date: Sun, 24 May 2026 21:59:32 GMT
- Title: LLM-as-a-Judge in Healthcare: A Scoping Analysis of Applications, Methods, and Human Alignment
- Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed across healthcare applications, including clinical documentation, diagnostic reasoning, medicine recommendation, and medical education.<n>LLMs-as-a-Judge offers a scalable alternative and is increasingly used in clinical evaluation, yet its validity in healthcare remains underexamined.
- Score: 29.53435959107992
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed across healthcare applications, including clinical documentation, diagnostic reasoning, medicine recommendation, and medical education. Their outputs are largely unstructured clinical text, which is difficult to reliably evaluate at scale. LLM-as-a-Judge, in which an LLM evaluates another system's output against task-specific criteria, offers a scalable alternative and is increasingly used in clinical evaluation, yet its validity in healthcare remains underexamined. Existing reviews focus on general-purpose LLM evaluation or on risk framework, rather than systematically characterizing how LLM-as-a-Judge is applied in healthcare and how well their judgments align with human experts. We therefore conduct a PRISMA-guided comprehensive review of LLM-as-a-Judge applications in healthcare, searching five databases for studies published between January 2023 and February 2026. After screening 541 records, 134 studies meet the eligibility and are coded by health scenario, judge configuration, technical approach, and validation design. LLM-as-a-Judge is concentrated in clinical decision support, clinical natural language processing (NLP), medical knowledge and question answering (QA), and medical communication. OpenAI models are the most frequently used judges, and prompt engineering appears in nearly all studies, with ensemble, multi-agent, and retrieval-augmented designs as common extensions. Among studies reporting human validation, LLM judges often show moderate to strong alignment with expert judgments, although reliability varies substantially across tasks. Overall, this review positions LLM-as-a-Judge as a promising framework for scalable healthcare AI evaluation, while emphasizing that its clinical value depends on model design and rigorous validation.
Related papers
- Comparative Analysis of Large Language Models in Healthcare [1.9704270315085601]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are transforming artificial intelligence applications in healthcare.<n>Their deployment in high-stakes clinical environments raises critical concerns regarding accuracy, reliability, and patient safety.<n>This study addresses the need for a standardized comparative evaluation of LLMs in medical settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-11T18:47:54Z) - Simulating Viva Voce Examinations to Evaluate Clinical Reasoning in Large Language Models [51.91760712805404]
We introduce VivaBench, a benchmark for evaluating sequential clinical reasoning in large language models (LLMs)<n>Our dataset consists of 1762 physician-curated clinical vignettes structured as interactive scenarios that simulate a (oral) examination in medical training.<n>Our analysis identified several failure modes that mirror common cognitive errors in clinical practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-11T16:24:35Z) - LLM-as-a-Fuzzy-Judge: Fine-Tuning Large Language Models as a Clinical Evaluation Judge with Fuzzy Logic [3.1090878361419416]
This paper proposes LLM-as-a-Fuzzy-Judge to align automated evaluation of medical students' clinical skills with subjective physicians' preferences.<n>The approach is fine-tuned to evaluate medical students' utterances within student-AI patient conversation scripts based on human annotations from four fuzzy sets.<n>The results show that the LLM-as-a-Fuzzy-Judge achieves over 80% accuracy, with major criteria items over 90%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-12T18:31:49Z) - LLMEval-Med: A Real-world Clinical Benchmark for Medical LLMs with Physician Validation [58.25892575437433]
evaluating large language models (LLMs) in medicine is crucial because medical applications require high accuracy with little room for error.<n>We present LLMEval-Med, a new benchmark covering five core medical areas, including 2,996 questions created from real-world electronic health records and expert-designed clinical scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-04T15:43:14Z) - Med-CoDE: Medical Critique based Disagreement Evaluation Framework [72.42301910238861]
The reliability and accuracy of large language models (LLMs) in medical contexts remain critical concerns.<n>Current evaluation methods often lack robustness and fail to provide a comprehensive assessment of LLM performance.<n>We propose Med-CoDE, a specifically designed evaluation framework for medical LLMs to address these challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-21T16:51:11Z) - Quantifying the Reasoning Abilities of LLMs on Real-world Clinical Cases [48.87360916431396]
We introduce MedR-Bench, a benchmarking dataset of 1,453 structured patient cases, annotated with reasoning references.<n>We propose a framework encompassing three critical examination recommendation, diagnostic decision-making, and treatment planning, simulating the entire patient care journey.<n>Using this benchmark, we evaluate five state-of-the-art reasoning LLMs, including DeepSeek-R1, OpenAI-o3-mini, and Gemini-2.0-Flash Thinking, etc.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-06T18:35:39Z) - Fact or Guesswork? Evaluating Large Language Models' Medical Knowledge with Structured One-Hop Judgments [108.55277188617035]
Large language models (LLMs) have been widely adopted in various downstream task domains, but their abilities to directly recall and apply factual medical knowledge remains under-explored.<n>We introduce the Medical Knowledge Judgment dataset (MKJ), a dataset derived from the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS), a comprehensive repository of standardized vocabularies and knowledge graphs.<n>Through a binary classification framework, MKJ evaluates LLMs' grasp of fundamental medical facts by having them assess the validity of concise, one-hop statements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-20T05:27:51Z) - MEDIC: Towards a Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating LLMs in Clinical Applications [2.838746648891565]
We introduce MEDIC, a framework assessing Large Language Models (LLMs) across five critical dimensions of clinical competence.
We apply MEDIC to evaluate LLMs on medical question-answering, safety, summarization, note generation, and other tasks.
Results show performance disparities across model sizes, baseline vs medically finetuned models, and have implications on model selection for applications requiring specific model strengths.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-11T14:44:51Z) - Large Language Models in the Clinic: A Comprehensive Benchmark [63.21278434331952]
We build a benchmark ClinicBench to better understand large language models (LLMs) in the clinic.
We first collect eleven existing datasets covering diverse clinical language generation, understanding, and reasoning tasks.
We then construct six novel datasets and clinical tasks that are complex but common in real-world practice.
We conduct an extensive evaluation of twenty-two LLMs under both zero-shot and few-shot settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-25T15:51:06Z) - Does Biomedical Training Lead to Better Medical Performance? [7.341724934479004]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are expected to significantly contribute to patient care, diagnostics, and administrative processes.<n>This study investigates the effect of biomedical training in the context of six practical medical tasks evaluating $25$ models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-05T12:51:37Z) - Large Language Models Illuminate a Progressive Pathway to Artificial
Healthcare Assistant: A Review [16.008511195589925]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown promising capabilities in mimicking human-level language comprehension and reasoning.
This paper provides a comprehensive review on the applications and implications of LLMs in medicine.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-03T13:51:36Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.