Insuring Every Action: An Authority Frontier Framework for Runtime Actuarial Control of Autonomous AI Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.25632v1
• Date: Mon, 25 May 2026 09:31:48 GMT
• Title: Insuring Every Action: An Authority Frontier Framework for Runtime Actuarial Control of Autonomous AI Agents
• Abstract summary: We propose the Actuarial Action Interface (AAI), a deterministic runtime contract that prices each such action against a contractually fixed safe default.<n>We then develop the Authority Frontier, an evaluation primitive measuring how much autonomous authority the runtime releases at each level of reserve capital.<n>The contribution is a benchmark-ready evaluation framework for runtime actuarial control of autonomous-agent side effects.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Autonomous AI agents increasingly issue side-effect-bearing actions: database mutations, refunds, payments, external commitments. We propose the Actuarial Action Interface (AAI), a deterministic runtime contract that prices each such action against a contractually fixed safe default under a time-consistent risk mapping, and gates execution against a per-boundary reserve capital budget. We then develop the Authority Frontier, an evaluation primitive measuring how much autonomous authority the runtime releases at each level of reserve capital. The framework provides (i) a deterministic quote-bind-commit protocol with toll-bounded capability tokens; (ii) a universal seven-class action taxonomy mapping heterogeneous tool calls to comparable authority units; (iii) replay determinism and pathwise reserve coverage under alpha-spending; (iv) cross-domain normalization via full reserve demand C_full and capital metrics Capital@k. We instantiate AAI across four agentic environments (database mutation, customer-service refund, and the public tau-bench retail and airline tool-use traces) and report a live Postgres panel in which three Azure-hosted models propose actions through the same contract. The frontier exhibits a common low-reserve refusal and intermediate-release pattern across domains, with saturation only where the budget grid reaches full reserve demand; required reserve capital varies by 22x (Capital@50 from 289 to 6457). The framework does not force domains into the same shape; it surfaces each domain's actuarial geometry. In the live panel the contract prevents realized loss across all three models at low budget while differing in underwriting persistence under denial: model identity is an actuarial underwriting variable. The contribution is a benchmark-ready evaluation framework for runtime actuarial control of autonomous-agent side effects.

Related papers

• EvoSafeHarness: Evolving Model- and Domain-Specific Harnesses for Securing Agents [74.54929751174289]
  EvoSafeHarness is a safety-specific optimization framework that synthesizes a deployable harness for a frozen model in a target domain.<n>It reduces average attack success rate from 45.6% to 10.0% at a 3.3-point utility cost.<n>It also achieves the best score on Agent-SafetyBench for every victim.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-05T05:56:41Z)
• Criticality-Based Guard Rail Validation for AI Agent Decisions in Autonomous Telecom Networks [0.0]
  Guard Rail Validation (GRV) is a standardizable runtime architecture for intercepting and validating AI-driven decisions before execution.<n>We present the architecture, algorithmic procedures, O-RAN deployment model, and evaluate threat coverage against known AI/ML attacks in telecommunications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-02T14:21:26Z)
• Gaming-Resistant Insurance Contracts for Autonomous AI Agents: Strategy-Proof Toll Mechanism Design [0.0]
  Paper A defines a time-consistent actuarial runtime that prices each side-effect against a contractually fixed safe default and gates execution against a reserve budget.<n>We characterise a five-attack space for autonomous AI-agent insurance contracts and prove when the actuarial runtime is gaming-resistant.<n>We then compose these clauses with Paper A's runtime guarantees to obtain joint incentive compatibility over the five-attack space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-15T07:31:21Z)
• AgentBeats: Agentifying Agent Assessment for Openness, Standardization, and Reproducibility [104.46861849039357]
  Agent systems are advancing quickly across domains, but their evaluation remains fragmented.<n>The root problem is the lack of an open, agent-agnostic assessment interface.<n>We advocate Agentified Agent Assessment (AAA), where evaluation is performed by judge agents and all participants interact through standardized protocols.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-11T17:23:54Z)
• Foundations of a Time-Consistent Counterfactual Actuarial Runtime for Autonomous AI Agents [0.0]
  We propose a runtime actuarial layer for autonomous AI agents.<n>Every side-effect-bearing action carries a time-consistent, counterfactual risk toll against a contractually fixed safe default.<n>The paper states the primitive contract, the toll identity, the within-boundary no-arbitrage result, and the budget guarantee on which those later layers depend.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-26T03:47:58Z)
• ComplexMCP: Evaluation of LLM Agents in Dynamic, Interdependent, and Large-Scale Tool Sandbox [61.862814740220806]
  $textbfComplexMCP$ is a benchmark designed to evaluate agents in rigorous conditions.<n>Built on the Model Context Protocol (MCP), $textbfComplexMCP$ provides over 300 meticulously tested tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-11T16:20:51Z)
• AgenticAITA: A Proof-Of-Concept About Deliberative Multi-Agent Reasoning for Autonomous Trading Systems [0.0]
  AGENTICAITA is an agentic AI framework that replaces the traditional signal then execute paradigm with a fully autonomous loop.<n>The framework demonstrates operational correctness of the deliberative pipeline, achieving 157 zero-intervention invocations across 76 assets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-01T16:25:43Z)
• Governing What You Cannot Observe: Adaptive Runtime Governance for Autonomous AI Agents [0.0]
  Autonomous AI agents can remain fully authorized and still become unsafe as behavior drifts, adversaries adapt, and decision patterns shift without any code change.<n>We propose the textbfInformational Viability Principle: governing an agent reduces to estimating a bound on unobserved risk.<n>textbfRiskGate instantiates the framework with dedicated statistical estimators (KL divergence, segment-vs-rest $z$-tests, sequential pattern matching), a fail-secure monotonic pipeline, and a closed-loop Autopilot.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-27T16:46:15Z)
• Taming Actor-Observer Asymmetry in Agents via Dialectical Alignment [59.536125286960186]
  Multi-agent frameworks assigning specialized roles are increasingly adopted to enable self-reflection and mutual auditing.<n>We find it simultaneously induces a human-like cognitive bias known as Actor-Observer Asymmetry.<n>ReTAS guides agents to synthesize conflicting viewpoints into an objective consensus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-21T15:05:58Z)
• Harness as an Asset: Enforcing Determinism via the Convergent AI Agent Framework (CAAF) [0.0]
  Large Language Models produce a controllability gap in safety-critical engineering.<n>We introduce the Convergent AI Agent Framework (CAAF), which transitions agentic from open-loop generation to closed-loop fail-safe determinism.<n>CAAF's three pillars address complementary failure surfaces and none alone closes the controllability gap at commodity cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-18T15:15:09Z)
• Quantifying Self-Preservation Bias in Large Language Models [9.590157416396194]
  We introduce the emphTwo-role Benchmark for Self-Preservation.<n>It measures how often role identity overrides objective utility.<n>We observe that in low-improvement regimes, models exploit the interpretive slack to post-hoc rationalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-02T15:38:31Z)
• Adversarial Intent is a Latent Variable: Stateful Trust Inference for Securing Multimodal Agentic RAG [5.4716896485317195]
  Current stateless defences for multimodal agentic RAG fail to detect adversarial strategies that distribute malicious semantics.<n>We introduce MMA-RAGT, an inference-time control framework governed by a Modular Trust Agent (MTA) that maintains an approximate belief state.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-24T23:52:27Z)
• Towards a Science of Scaling Agent Systems [79.64446272302287]
  We formalize a definition for agent evaluation and characterize scaling laws as the interplay between agent quantity, coordination structure, modelic, and task properties.<n>We derive a predictive model using coordination metrics, that cross-validated R2=0, enabling prediction on unseen task domains.<n>We identify three effects: (1) a tool-coordination trade-off: under fixed computational budgets, tool-heavy tasks suffer disproportionately from multi-agent overhead, and (2) a capability saturation: coordination yields diminishing or negative returns once single-agent baselines exceed 45%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-09T06:52:21Z)
• VCG Mechanism Design with Unknown Agent Values under Stochastic Bandit Feedback [104.06766271716774]
  We study a multi-round welfare-maximising mechanism design problem in instances where agents do not know their values. We first define three notions of regret for the welfare, the individual utilities of each agent and that of the mechanism. Our framework also provides flexibility to control the pricing scheme so as to trade-off between the agent and seller regrets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-19T18:00:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.