Confounder Detection via Treatment Intent: A New Observational Study Design

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26413v1
• Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 00:41:47 GMT
• Title: Confounder Detection via Treatment Intent: A New Observational Study Design
• Abstract summary: We introduce a new study design called confounder detection via treatment intent.<n>The idea is to query a human expert who makes treatment decisions, and ask them to compare pairs of units.<n>We show empirical evidence that electronic health records collected in ICUs are subject to unobserved confounding.
• Score: 69.50062870487349
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Understanding the effects of interventions is central to scientific progress, with randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarded as the gold standard for causal inference in many applied fields. However, RCTs are costly, time-consuming, and often constrained by ethical or practical limitations, motivating the need for causal methods able to draw conclusions from observational data. While such data is collected at ever larger scale, making its use for causal inference is often hindered by the fact that not all variables affecting treatment allocation and the outcome are observed: an issue known as unobserved confounding. In this paper, we introduce a new study design called confounder detection via treatment intent. The idea is to query a human expert who makes treatment decisions, and ask them to compare pairs of units proposed by a principled matching strategy, with the goal of eliciting unobserved variables that explain why treatment decisions differ. We provide a theoretical basis for such a procedure, ascertaining conditions under which such a study design may elicit unobserved confounders. Building on this newly established foundations, we study treatment effects of interventions in the intensive care unit (ICU). First, we show empirical evidence strongly indicating that electronic health records (EHRs) collected in ICUs are subject to unobserved confounding. By using clinical text notes as a proxy for physicians' knowledge and leveraging natural language processing, we provide a proof of concept for our methodology in a semi-synthetic environment with a known ground truth.

Related papers

• Causal Inference for Preprocessed Outcomes with an Application to Functional Connectivity [1.7078619393681336]
  We propose a semiparametric framework for causal inference with derived outcomes obtained after intra-subject processing.<n>We specialize the framework to a mediation setting and focus on the natural direct effect.<n>We apply our method to estimate the impact of stimulant medication on brain connectivity in children with autism spectrum disorder.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T15:48:34Z)
• What Makes Treatment Effects Identifiable? Characterizations and Estimators Beyond Unconfoundedness [14.699342649039052]
  We study general conditions that enable the identification of the average treatment effect.<n>We provide an interpretable condition that is sufficient and necessary for the identification of ATE.<n>We prove that ATE can be identified in regimes that prior works could not capture.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-04T17:40:55Z)
• Constructing Confidence Intervals for Average Treatment Effects from Multiple Datasets [51.2467404472005]
  We propose a new method that estimates the ATE from multiple observational datasets and provides valid CIs.<n>Our method makes little assumptions about the observational datasets and is thus widely applicable in medical practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-16T07:39:46Z)
• Causal Graph Aided Causal Discovery in an Observational Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Study [0.9217021281095907]
  Causal inference methods for observational data are increasingly recognized as a valuable complement to randomized clinical trials (RCTs) We present and illustrate methods that provide "midway insights" during study's course. Concepts are illustrated through an analysis of data generated by patients with aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (aSAH) In addition, we propose a method for multicenter studies, to monitor the impact of changes in practice at an individual center's level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-12T19:31:16Z)
• The Blessings of Multiple Treatments and Outcomes in Treatment Effect Estimation [53.81860494566915]
  Existing studies leveraged proxy variables or multiple treatments to adjust for confounding bias. In many real-world scenarios, there is greater interest in studying the effects on multiple outcomes. We show that parallel studies of multiple outcomes involved in this setting can assist each other in causal identification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T14:33:48Z)
• Ambiguous Dynamic Treatment Regimes: A Reinforcement Learning Approach [0.0]
  Dynamic Treatment Regimes (DTRs) are widely studied to formalize this process. We develop Reinforcement Learning methods to efficiently learn optimal treatment regimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-08T20:22:04Z)
• SurvITE: Learning Heterogeneous Treatment Effects from Time-to-Event Data [83.50281440043241]
  We study the problem of inferring heterogeneous treatment effects from time-to-event data. We propose a novel deep learning method for treatment-specific hazard estimation based on balancing representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-26T20:13:17Z)
• Learning Decomposed Representation for Counterfactual Inference [53.36586760485262]
  The fundamental problem in treatment effect estimation from observational data is confounder identification and balancing. Most of the previous methods realized confounder balancing by treating all observed pre-treatment variables as confounders, ignoring further identifying confounders and non-confounders. We propose a synergistic learning framework to 1) identify confounders by learning representations of both confounders and non-confounders, 2) balance confounder with sample re-weighting technique, and simultaneously 3) estimate the treatment effect in observational studies via counterfactual inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-12T09:50:42Z)
• Generalization Bounds and Representation Learning for Estimation of Potential Outcomes and Causal Effects [61.03579766573421]
  We study estimation of individual-level causal effects, such as a single patient's response to alternative medication. We devise representation learning algorithms that minimize our bound, by regularizing the representation's induced treatment group distance. We extend these algorithms to simultaneously learn a weighted representation to further reduce treatment group distances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-21T10:16:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.