Psychological Constructs in Shared Semantic Space

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26801v1
• Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 10:16:24 GMT
• Title: Psychological Constructs in Shared Semantic Space
• Abstract summary: Psychological constructs are often measured in separate instruments, datasets, and research traditions.<n>This paper proposes a framework for making such constructs semantically commensurate by representing and comparing them as directions in a shared word-embedding space.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Psychological constructs are often measured in separate instruments, datasets, and research traditions, which makes direct comparison difficult. This paper proposes a framework for making such constructs semantically commensurate by representing and comparing them as directions in a shared word-embedding space. Using Supervised Semantic Differential, we estimate construct-specific semantic gradients from text-outcome associations and project them onto theoretically motivated reference axes. As an initial test case, we use Valence, Arousal, and Dominance (VAD) as an affective coordinate system. First, we recover interpretable VAD directions from English word-level affective norms. Second, we project semantic gradients for 27 GoEmotions categories into this space and recover the expected organization of emotions, especially along valence and arousal. Third, we apply the same procedure to Big Five personality domains and facets derived from IPIP-NEO-300 item-factor associations. Domain-level placements are broadly coherent, while facet-level results are more exploratory because they rely on sparse questionnaire text. The results suggest that embedding spaces can support construct-level comparison across otherwise incommensurable psychological measurements, provided that semantic placements are assessed for stability and interpretability.

Related papers

• Supervised Semantic Differential for Cross-Cultural Concept Analysis: A Case Study of Human Affect [0.16385815610837165]
  Cross-lingual comparison of psychological meaning requires methods that go beyond word-level translation.<n>We introduce a cross-lingual extension of the Supervised Semantic Differential (SSD), which estimates supervised semantic gradients in embedding space.<n>We demonstrate the approach on Polish, English, and French affective norm lexicons, modeling Valence, Arousal, and Dominance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-27T09:40:34Z)
• Semantic Structure of Feature Space in Large Language Models [0.0]
  We show that the geometric relations between semantic features in large language models closely mirror human psychological associations.<n>We construct feature vectors corresponding to 360 words and project them on 32 semantic axes.<n>We find that these projections correlate highly with human ratings of those words on the respective semantic scales.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-29T20:17:43Z)
• Floating or Suggesting Ideas? A Large-Scale Contrastive Analysis of Metaphorical and Literal Verb-Object Constructions [53.690096725532726]
  We analyze 297 English verb-object pairs (e.g., float idea vs. suggest idea) in 2M corpus sentences.<n>Using five NLP tools, we extract 2,293 cognitive and linguistic features capturing affective, lexical, syntactic, and discourse-level properties.<n>Cross-pair results show literal contexts have higher lexical frequency, cohesion, and structural regularity, while metaphorical contexts show greater affective load, imageability, lexical diversity, and constructional specificity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-09T14:08:57Z)
• The Prediction-Measurement Gap: Toward Meaning Representations as Scientific Instruments [0.0]
  The paper argues that scientific meaning analysis motivates a distinct family of objectives - scientific usability.<n>The paper assesses static word embeddings and contextual transformer representations against these requirements.<n>As the field debates the limits of scale-first progress, measurement-ready representations offer a principled new frontier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-10T18:08:53Z)
• Semantic Structure in Large Language Model Embeddings [0.0]
  Psychological research consistently finds that human ratings of words can be reduced to a low-dimensional form with relatively little information loss.<n>We show that the projections of words on semantic directions defined by antonym pairs correlate highly with human ratings.<n>We find that shifting tokens along one semantic direction causes off-target effects on geometrically aligned features proportional to their cosine similarity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T20:21:50Z)
• What is Sentiment Meant to Mean to Language Models? [0.0]
  "sentiment" entails a wide variety of concepts depending on the domain and tools used. "sentiment" has been used to mean emotion, opinions, market movements, or simply a general good-bad'' dimension.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-03T19:37:37Z)
• Two in One Go: Single-stage Emotion Recognition with Decoupled Subject-context Transformer [78.35816158511523]
  We present a single-stage emotion recognition approach, employing a Decoupled Subject-Context Transformer (DSCT) for simultaneous subject localization and emotion classification. We evaluate our single-stage framework on two widely used context-aware emotion recognition datasets, CAER-S and EMOTIC.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-26T07:30:32Z)
• Sentiment-Aware Word and Sentence Level Pre-training for Sentiment Analysis [64.70116276295609]
  SentiWSP is a Sentiment-aware pre-trained language model with combined Word-level and Sentence-level Pre-training tasks. SentiWSP achieves new state-of-the-art performance on various sentence-level and aspect-level sentiment classification benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-18T12:25:29Z)
• Domain-level Pairwise Semantic Interaction for Aspect-Based Sentiment Classification [3.1977819149534987]
  We propose a plug-and-play Pairwise Semantic Interaction (PSI) module, which takes pairwise sentences as input. Different gates are generated to effectively highlight the key semantic features of each sentence. Finally, the adversarial interaction between the vectors is used to make the semantic representation of two sentences more distinguishable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-21T07:59:17Z)
• Contextualized Semantic Distance between Highly Overlapped Texts [85.1541170468617]
  Overlapping frequently occurs in paired texts in natural language processing tasks like text editing and semantic similarity evaluation. This paper aims to address the issue with a mask-and-predict strategy. We take the words in the longest common sequence as neighboring words and use masked language modeling (MLM) to predict the distributions on their positions. Experiments on Semantic Textual Similarity show NDD to be more sensitive to various semantic differences, especially on highly overlapped paired texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-04T03:59:15Z)
• A Comparative Study on Structural and Semantic Properties of Sentence Embeddings [77.34726150561087]
  We propose a set of experiments using a widely-used large-scale data set for relation extraction. We show that different embedding spaces have different degrees of strength for the structural and semantic properties. These results provide useful information for developing embedding-based relation extraction methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-23T15:45:32Z)
• SentiBERT: A Transferable Transformer-Based Architecture for Compositional Sentiment Semantics [82.51956663674747]
  SentiBERT is a variant of BERT that effectively captures compositional sentiment semantics. We show that SentiBERT achieves competitive performance on phrase-level sentiment classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-08T15:40:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.