It's Not Always Sycophancy: Measuring LLM Conformity as a Function of Epistemic Uncertainty

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.27288v1
• Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 17:04:11 GMT
• Title: It's Not Always Sycophancy: Measuring LLM Conformity as a Function of Epistemic Uncertainty
• Abstract summary: We show that large language models (LLMs) abandon their initial stance to conform to user pushback.<n>We characterize two distinct factors that jointly drive conformity: sycophantic conformity and uncertainty-driven conformity.<n>MUSE informs more targeted intervention strategies by distinguishing alignment-induced sycophancy and training-corpora-driven uncertainty.
• Score: 12.166175637413637
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are known to abandon their initial stance to conform to user pushback. While prior research largely attributes this behavior to sycophancy learned during reinforcement learning from human feedback, we hypothesize that conformity is also driven by a model's epistemic uncertainty at inference time. In this paper, we introduce MUSE, a two-stage evaluation framework to disentangle the mechanisms driving LLM conformity. Specifically, MUSE maps a model's epistemic uncertainty in responding to a query against its likelihood to yield to user pushback in a subsequent turn. We demonstrate that the mechanisms driving conformity extend beyond sycophancy alone. Specifically, we characterize two distinct factors that jointly drive conformity: sycophantic conformity, where a model aligns with user pushback even with absolute certainty in its initial response, and uncertainty-driven conformity, where a model's likelihood for conformity increases alongside its uncertainty. Furthermore, we conduct ablation studies to demonstrate that both sycophantic conformity and uncertainty-driven conformity grow with 1) the LLM's perceived expertise of the user and 2) the plausibility of the user's suggestions. More broadly, MUSE informs more targeted intervention strategies by distinguishing alignment-induced sycophancy and training-corpora-driven uncertainty.

Related papers

• THESIS-MoE: Trainable Hierarchical Extraction and SteerIng of Sycophancy in Mixture-of-Experts [0.300988853836121]
  Sycophancy, the tendency of a language model to change its answer to match a user's stated belief, is a common alignment failure.<n>We introduce a shared contrastive signal, built from matched prompts with and without a stated belief, that identifies where sycophancy lives.<n>Our results demonstrate that sycophancy resides in identifiable computational subcircuits and can be selectively steered.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-16T11:30:26Z)
• Behavioural Signatures of Risk-Sensitive Decision-Making in Large Language Models [121.70781851874035]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in decision support.<n>It is important to understand whether their choices under uncertainty exhibit stable and interpretable behavioural regularities.<n>Here we examine this question using a controlled multi-model framework based on no-limit Texas Hold'em.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-11T10:33:39Z)
• Reinforcement Learning with Metacognitive Feedback Elicits Faithful Uncertainty Expression in LLMs [60.80435138270317]
  We apply reinforcement learning with metacognitive feedback to the problem of faithful calibration.<n>Experiments show RLMF achieves generalizable, state-of-the-art FC on diverse tasks.<n> RLMF surpasses standard RL by up to 63% while enhancing models' ability to assess and express their own capability limits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-30T17:56:01Z)
• Compliance versus Sensibility: On the Reasoning Controllability in Large Language Models [46.26628756478016]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are known to acquire reasoning capabilities through shared inference patterns in pre-training data.<n>We show that reasoning conflicts are internally detectable, as confidence scores significantly drop during conflicting episodes.<n>Our findings establish that while LLM reasoning is anchored to concrete instances, active mechanistic interventions can effectively decouple logical schemata from data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-29T22:55:40Z)
• Towards Trustworthy Depression Estimation via Disentangled Evidential Learning [50.22167852149165]
  We propose EviDep, an evidential learning framework that jointly quantifies depression severity.<n>EviDep enforces strict information integrity to guarantee robust evidence synthesis.<n>It achieves state-of-the-art predictive accuracy and superior uncertainty calibration, delivering a robust fail-safe mechanism for trustworthy clinical screening.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-17T13:27:11Z)
• Neural Uncertainty Principle: A Unified View of Adversarial Fragility and LLM Hallucination [60.197429875410286]
  Adversarial vulnerability in vision and hallucination in large language models are conventionally viewed as separate problems.<n>Formalizing a Neural Uncertainty Principle (NUP) under a loss-induced state, we find that in near-bound regimes, further compression must be accompanied by increased sensitivity dispersion.<n>In vision, masking highly coupled components improves robustness without costly adversarial training.<n>In language, the same prefill-stage probe detects hallucination risk before generating any answer tokens.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-20T02:07:10Z)
• Agentic Uncertainty Quantification [76.94013626702183]
  We propose a unified Dual-Process Agentic UQ (AUQ) framework that transforms verbalized uncertainty into active, bi-directional control signals.<n>Our architecture comprises two complementary mechanisms: System 1 (Uncertainty-Aware Memory, UAM), which implicitly propagates verbalized confidence and semantic explanations to prevent blind decision-making; and System 2 (Uncertainty-Aware Reflection, UAR), which utilizes these explanations as rational cues to trigger targeted inference-time resolution only when necessary.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T07:16:26Z)
• Fact-Checking with Large Language Models via Probabilistic Certainty and Consistency [7.806516365113592]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in applications requiring factual accuracy.<n>While fact-checking can mitigate these errors, existing methods typically retrieve external evidence indiscriminately.<n>We introduce Probabilistic Certainty and Consistency (PCC), a framework that estimates factual confidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-05T21:57:41Z)
• Sycophancy Mitigation Through Reinforcement Learning with Uncertainty-Aware Adaptive Reasoning Trajectories [58.988535279557546]
  We introduce textbf sycophancy Mitigation through Adaptive Reasoning Trajectories.<n>We show that SMART significantly reduces sycophantic behavior while preserving strong performance on out-of-distribution inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-20T17:09:14Z)
• Sycophancy under Pressure: Evaluating and Mitigating Sycophantic Bias via Adversarial Dialogues in Scientific QA [36.21980066799023]
  sycophancy is the tendency to align with user beliefs regardless of correctness.<n>Despite its importance, sycophancy remains underexamined in factual question answering contexts.<n>We introduce a unified evaluation framework to quantify the impact of sycophantic context on model behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-19T11:30:52Z)
• Disentangling the Drivers of LLM Social Conformity: An Uncertainty-Moderated Dual-Process Mechanism [19.07643218338789]
  Large language models (LLMs) integrate into collaborative teams, their social conformity has emerged as a key concern.<n>In humans, conformity arises from informational influence (rational use of group cues for accuracy) or normative influence (social pressure for approval)<n>This study adapts the information cascade paradigm from behavioral economics to quantitatively disentangle the two drivers to investigate the moderate effect.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-17T03:53:55Z)
• Accounting for Sycophancy in Language Model Uncertainty Estimation [28.08509288774144]
  We study the relationship between sycophancy and uncertainty estimation for the first time. We show that user confidence plays a critical role in modulating the effects of sycophancy. We argue that externalizing both model and user uncertainty can help to mitigate the impacts of sycophancy bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T18:00:25Z)
• Probabilities Are Not Enough: Formal Controller Synthesis for Stochastic Dynamical Models with Epistemic Uncertainty [68.00748155945047]
  Capturing uncertainty in models of complex dynamical systems is crucial to designing safe controllers. Several approaches use formal abstractions to synthesize policies that satisfy temporal specifications related to safety and reachability. Our contribution is a novel abstraction-based controller method for continuous-state models with noise, uncertain parameters, and external disturbances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-12T07:57:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.