Intent-based Security Management Using the TM Forum TR292I Security Ontology

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.27743v1
• Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 22:35:01 GMT
• Title: Intent-based Security Management Using the TM Forum TR292I Security Ontology
• Abstract summary: This paper presents a declarative, autonomous, self-protecting framework based on our design and standardization of the TM Forum TR292I Security Ontology v4.0.0.<n>Our approach leverages Description Logic (DL) and automated graph reasoning within a closed-loop execution pipeline to dynamically neutralize live threats.<n>We validate our model-driven architecture through a structural formal verification walkthrough of a distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack mitigation sequence on a disaggregated Next-Generation NodeB slice, demonstrating how automated reasoning resolves runtime constraint conflicts without human intervention.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Modern 5G-Advanced and emerging 6G cloud-native telecom architectures encounter unprecedented hyper-complexity, multi-layered threat vectors, and fluid structural topologies. Managing infrastructure security using manual, imperative configurations introduces a severe latency gap, presenting attackers with an exploitable window. This paper presents a declarative, autonomous, self-protecting framework based on our design and standardization of the TM Forum TR292I Security Ontology v4.0.0. Our approach leverages Description Logic (DL) and automated graph reasoning within a closed-loop execution pipeline to dynamically neutralize live threats. Crucially, the system balances functional protection expectations with non-functional resource impact considerations (e.g., latency vs. compute overhead). We validate our model-driven architecture through a structural formal verification walkthrough of a distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack mitigation sequence on a disaggregated Next-Generation NodeB (gNB) slice, demonstrating how automated reasoning resolves runtime constraint conflicts without human intervention.

Related papers

• Architecting the Secure AI-SOC: A Neurosymbolic Framework for Pipeline Integrity and Threat Mitigation [4.043348052153102]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) into Security Operations Centers (SOCs) streamlines threat intelligence but introduces critical vulnerabilities.<n> Adversaries exploit this vector to execute multistep promptware'' kill chains by embedding malicious payloads within system logs.<n>We propose a novel neurosymbolic defense-in-depth architecture that ensures end-to-end pipeline integrity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-09T18:03:41Z)
• Defending against Model Extraction for GNNs with Model Reprogramming [57.82196268649236]
  Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) serve as the backbone for high-stakes applications in Machine-Learning-as-a-Service (ML)<n>Still, their black-box deployment exposes them to Model Extraction (ME) attacks.<n>Existing defenses suffer from a critical ''Euclidean bias''<n>We propose GraphRP, a proactive defense framework that repurposes Model Reprogramming for security.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-11T23:20:15Z)
• Provably Secure Agent Guardrail [89.79561918065122]
  Existing defense architectures rely on empirical semantic guardrails and probabilistic large model adjudicators.<n>This paper proposes a new security paradigm for agents based on the fundamental limitations of logical reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T02:12:41Z)
• TwinGate: Stateful Defense against Decompositional Jailbreaks in Untraceable Traffic via Asymmetric Contrastive Learning [60.68349524623048]
  Decompositional jailbreaks pose a critical threat to large language models.<n>We present TwinGate, a stateful dual-encoder defense framework.<n>We construct a comprehensive dataset of over 3.62 million instructions spanning 8,600 distinct malicious intents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-30T13:44:01Z)
• Uncovering Security Threats and Architecting Defenses in Autonomous Agents: A Case Study of OpenClaw [42.9467373594646]
  This report presents a comprehensive security analysis of the OpenClaw ecosystem.<n>We highlight critical vulnerabilities such as prompt injection-driven Remote Code Execution (RCE), sequential tool attack chains, context amnesia, and supply chain contamination.<n>To address these systemic architectural flaws, we introduce the Full-Lifecycle Agent Security Architecture (FASA)<n>This theoretical defense blueprint advocates for zero-trust agentic execution, dynamic intent verification, and cross-layer reasoning-action correlation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-13T04:33:05Z)
• Just Ask: Curious Code Agents Reveal System Prompts in Frontier LLMs [65.6660735371212]
  We present textbftextscJustAsk, a framework that autonomously discovers effective extraction strategies through interaction alone.<n>It formulates extraction as an online exploration problem, using Upper Confidence Bound--based strategy selection and a hierarchical skill space spanning atomic probes and high-level orchestration.<n>Our results expose system prompts as a critical yet largely unprotected attack surface in modern agent systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T03:53:25Z)
• CaMeLs Can Use Computers Too: System-level Security for Computer Use Agents [60.98294016925157]
  AI agents are vulnerable to prompt injection attacks, where malicious content hijacks agent behavior to steal credentials or cause financial loss.<n>We introduce Single-Shot Planning for CUAs, where a trusted planner generates a complete execution graph with conditional branches before any observation of potentially malicious content.<n>Although this architectural isolation successfully prevents instruction injections, we show that additional measures are needed to prevent Branch Steering attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-14T23:06:35Z)
• VIGIL: Defending LLM Agents Against Tool Stream Injection via Verify-Before-Commit [44.24310459184061]
  LLM agents operating in open environments face escalating risks from indirect prompt injection.<n>We propose textbfVIGIL, a framework that shifts the paradigm from restrictive isolation to a verify-before-commit protocol.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-09T12:19:49Z)
• Countermind: A Multi-Layered Security Architecture for Large Language Models [0.0]
  This paper proposes Countermind, a multi-layered security architecture intended to shift defenses from a reactive, post hoc posture to a proactive, pre-inference, and intra-inference enforcement model.<n>The architecture proposes a fortified perimeter designed to structurally validate and transform all inputs, and an internal governance mechanism intended to constrain the model's semantic processing pathways before an output is generated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T18:41:18Z)
• DRIFT: Dynamic Rule-Based Defense with Injection Isolation for Securing LLM Agents [52.92354372596197]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly central to agentic systems due to their strong reasoning and planning capabilities.<n>This interaction also introduces the risk of prompt injection attacks, where malicious inputs from external sources can mislead the agent's behavior.<n>We propose a Dynamic Rule-based Isolation Framework for Trustworthy agentic systems, which enforces both control and data-level constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-13T05:01:09Z)
• Reformulation is All You Need: Addressing Malicious Text Features in DNNs [53.45564571192014]
  We propose a unified and adaptive defense framework that is effective against both adversarial and backdoor attacks.<n>Our framework outperforms existing sample-oriented defense baselines across a diverse range of malicious textual features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-02T03:39:43Z)
• AutoJailbreak: Exploring Jailbreak Attacks and Defenses through a Dependency Lens [83.08119913279488]
  We present a systematic analysis of the dependency relationships in jailbreak attack and defense techniques. We propose three comprehensive, automated, and logical frameworks. We show that the proposed ensemble jailbreak attack and defense framework significantly outperforms existing research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T07:24:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.