LegalGraphRAG: Multi-Agent Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Reliable Legal Reasoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.28120v1
• Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 08:13:11 GMT
• Title: LegalGraphRAG: Multi-Agent Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Reliable Legal Reasoning
• Abstract summary: Graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation (GraphRAG) advances flat document retrieval by structuring knowledge as relational graphs.<n>We propose LegalGraphRAG, a framework designed for reliable legal reasoning.<n>Our approach introduces two core components: a hierarchical legal graph that hierarchically organizes legal sources to enable retrieval at appropriate abstraction levels, and a multi-agent system for reliable legal reasoning.
• Score: 33.511857429085076
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation (GraphRAG) advances flat document retrieval by structuring knowledge as relational graphs, enabling more coherent and effective reasoning. However, applying it to specific domains like legal reasoning faces critical challenges. (i) Legal corpora are heterogeneous, containing multi-granular knowledge from cases, articles and interpretations. A flat knowledge graph cannot adequately differentiate between factual details, applied rules, and abstract principles, limiting accurate retrieval. (ii) Reliable legal judgment demands transparent, evidence-based reasoning. Traditional RAG passes retrieved context directly to an LLM without verification, resulting in opaque, error-prone reasoning. To this end, we propose LegalGraphRAG, a framework designed for reliable legal reasoning. Our approach introduces two core components: a hierarchical legal graph that hierarchically organizes legal sources to enable retrieval at appropriate abstraction levels, and a multi-agent system for reliable legal reasoning, where a Researcher retrieves candidate evidence, an Auditor rigorously verifies its validity against source documents, and an Adjudicator synthesizes the set of verified evidence to render a final judgment. Extensive experiments show that LegalGraphRAG achieves the state-of-the-art performance, outperforming existing GraphRAG baselines in accurate and trustworthy legal analysis. Our code, datasets and implementation details are available at https://github.com/XMUDeepLIT/LegalGraphRAG.

Related papers

• VeriGraph: Towards Verifiable Data-Analytic Agents [71.17693022916896]
  LLM-based agents have demonstrated strong capabilities in data-intensive analytical tasks, yet their outputs are rarely verifiable.<n>We propose VeriGraph, a traceable neuro-symbolic reasoning framework that enables agents to construct an explicit heterogeneous evidence directed acyclic graph.<n>Our results suggest that explicit evidence-graph construction is a promising path toward verifiable data-analytic agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-15T11:50:56Z)
• Citation-Closure Retrieval and Per-Rule Attribution for Real-World Regulatory Compliance Question Answering [54.97384993676565]
  We formalize Regulatory Compliance QA with RegOps-Bench, a novel benchmark featuring an Operational Knowledge Graph derived from complex national R&D regulations.<n>RefWalk traverses cross-document citations, fuses multi-view candidates via max-based aggregation, and enforces per-rule attribution to explicitly map claims to sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T10:38:38Z)
• Enhancing Judgment Document Generation via Agentic Legal Information Collection and Rubric-Guided Optimization [30.089203895815384]
  Existing approaches, typically relying on standard Retrieval-Augmented Generation and Supervised Fine-Tuning, often suffer from insufficient evidence recall, hallucinated statutory references, and flawed legal reasoning.<n>We propose Judge-R1, a unified framework designed to logically enhance LLM-based judgment document generation by jointly improving legal information collection and judgment document generation.<n>Experiments on the JuDGE benchmark demonstrate that Judge-R1 significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in both legal accuracy and generation quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-03T18:32:10Z)
• GLIER: Generative Legal Inference and Evidence Ranking for Legal Case Retrieval [21.760917997629317]
  GLIER (Generative Legal Inference and Evidence Ranking) is a framework that reformulates retrieval as an inference process over latent legal variables.<n>First, a Joint Generative Inference module translates raw queries into latent legal indicators, including charges and legal elements.<n>Second, a Multi-View Evidence Fusion mechanism aggregates generative confidence with structural and lexical signals for precise ranking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-26T16:02:59Z)
• LegalOne: A Family of Foundation Models for Reliable Legal Reasoning [54.57434222018289]
  We present LegalOne, a family of foundational models specifically tailored for the Chinese legal domain.<n>LegalOne is developed through a comprehensive three-phase pipeline designed to master legal reasoning.<n>We publicly release the LegalOne weights and the LegalKit evaluation framework to advance the field of Legal AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-31T10:18:32Z)
• HalluGraph: Auditable Hallucination Detection for Legal RAG Systems via Knowledge Graph Alignment [0.0]
  We introduce HalluGraph, a graph-theoretic framework that quantifies hallucinations through structural alignment between knowledge graphs extracted from context, query, and response.<n>Our approach produces bounded, interpretable metrics into textitEntity Grounding (EG), measuring whether entities in the response appear in source documents, and textitRelation Preservation (RP), verifying that asserted relationships are supported by context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-01T13:31:06Z)
• GLARE: Agentic Reasoning for Legal Judgment Prediction [60.13483016810707]
  Legal judgment prediction (LJP) has become increasingly important in the legal field.<n>Existing large language models (LLMs) have significant problems of insufficient reasoning due to a lack of legal knowledge.<n>We introduce GLARE, an agentic legal reasoning framework that dynamically acquires key legal knowledge by invoking different modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-22T13:38:12Z)
• Align-GRAG: Reasoning-Guided Dual Alignment for Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation [79.75818239774952]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities, but still struggle with issues like hallucinations and outdated information.<n>Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) addresses these issues by grounding LLM outputs in external knowledge with an Information Retrieval (IR) system.<n>We propose Align-GRAG, a novel reasoning-guided dual alignment framework in post-retrieval phrase.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T05:15:27Z)
• Incorporating Legal Structure in Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Case Study on Copyright Fair Use [44.99833362998488]
  This paper presents a domain-specific implementation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation tailored to the Fair Use Doctrine in U.S. copyright law.<n>Motivated by the increasing prevalence of DMCA takedowns and the lack of accessible legal support for content creators, we propose a structured approach that combines semantic search with legal knowledge graphs and court citation networks to improve retrieval quality and reasoning reliability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-04T15:53:49Z)
• An Ontology-Driven Graph RAG for Legal Norms: A Structural, Temporal, and Deterministic Approach [0.0]
  RAG systems in the legal domain face a critical challenge: standard, flat-text retrieval is blind to the hierarchical, diachronic, and causal structure of law, leading to anachronistic and unreliable answers.<n>This paper introduces the Structure-Aware Temporal Graph RAG (SAT-Graph RAG), an ontology-driven framework designed to overcome these limitations by explicitly modeling the formal structure and diachronic nature of legal norms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-29T18:36:57Z)
• SAILER: Structure-aware Pre-trained Language Model for Legal Case Retrieval [75.05173891207214]
  Legal case retrieval plays a core role in the intelligent legal system. Most existing language models have difficulty understanding the long-distance dependencies between different structures. We propose a new Structure-Aware pre-traIned language model for LEgal case Retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-22T10:47:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.