An Ontology-Driven Graph RAG for Legal Norms: A Structural, Temporal, and Deterministic Approach

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.00039v5
• Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 14:34:52 GMT
• Title: An Ontology-Driven Graph RAG for Legal Norms: A Structural, Temporal, and Deterministic Approach
• Authors: Hudson de Martim,
• Abstract summary: RAG systems in the legal domain face a critical challenge: standard, flat-text retrieval is blind to the hierarchical, diachronic, and causal structure of law, leading to anachronistic and unreliable answers.<n>This paper introduces the Structure-Aware Temporal Graph RAG (SAT-Graph RAG), an ontology-driven framework designed to overcome these limitations by explicitly modeling the formal structure and diachronic nature of legal norms.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems in the legal domain face a critical challenge: standard, flat-text retrieval is blind to the hierarchical, diachronic, and causal structure of law, leading to anachronistic and unreliable answers. This paper introduces the Structure-Aware Temporal Graph RAG (SAT-Graph RAG), an ontology-driven framework designed to overcome these limitations by explicitly modeling the formal structure and diachronic nature of legal norms. We ground our knowledge graph in a formal, LRMoo-inspired model that distinguishes abstract legal Works from their versioned Expressions. We model temporal states as efficient aggregations that reuse the versioned expressions (CTVs) of unchanged components, and we reify legislative events as first-class Action nodes to make causality explicit and queryable. This structured backbone enables a unified, planner-guided query strategy that applies explicit policies to deterministically resolve complex requests for (i) point-in-time retrieval, (ii) hierarchical impact analysis, and (iii) auditable provenance reconstruction. Through a case study on the Brazilian Constitution, we demonstrate how this approach provides a verifiable, temporally-correct substrate for LLMs, enabling higher-order analytical capabilities while drastically reducing the risk of factual errors. The result is a practical framework for building more trustworthy and explainable legal AI systems.

Related papers

• CoG: Controllable Graph Reasoning via Relational Blueprints and Failure-Aware Refinement over Knowledge Graphs [53.199517625701475]
  CoG is a training-free framework inspired by Dual-Process Theory that mimics the interplay between intuition and deliberation.<n>CoG significantly outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in both accuracy and efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-16T07:27:40Z)
• Disco-RAG: Discourse-Aware Retrieval-Augmented Generation [81.53888908988756]
  We propose Disco-RAG, a discourse-aware framework that injects discourse signals into the generation process.<n>Our method constructs intra-chunk discourse trees to capture local hierarchies and builds inter-chunk rhetorical graphs to model cross-passage coherence.<n>Experiments on question answering and long-document summarization benchmarks show the efficacy of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T20:32:50Z)
• KBQA-R1: Reinforcing Large Language Models for Knowledge Base Question Answering [64.62317305868264]
  We present textbfKBQA-R1, a framework that shifts the paradigm from text imitation to interaction optimization via Reinforcement Learning.<n>Treating KBQA as a multi-turn decision process, our model learns to navigate the knowledge base using a list of actions.<n>Experiments on WebQSP, GrailQA, and GraphQuestions demonstrate that KBQA-R1 achieves state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-10T17:45:42Z)
• Structure-R1: Dynamically Leveraging Structural Knowledge in LLM Reasoning through Reinforcement Learning [29.722512436773638]
  We propose textscStructure-R1, a framework that transforms retrieved content into structured representations optimized for reasoning.<n>We show that textscStructure-R1 consistently achieves competitive performance with a 7B-scale backbone model.<n>Our theoretical analysis demonstrates how structured representations enhance reasoning by improving information density and contextual clarity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-16T23:19:28Z)
• Deterministic Legal Agents: A Canonical Primitive API for Auditable Reasoning over Temporal Knowledge Graphs [0.0]
  This paper introduces a formal Primitive API designed as a secure execution layer for reasoning over temporal knowledge graphs.<n>Instead of a monolithic query engine, our framework provides a library of canonical primitives-atomic, composable, and auditable primitives.<n>This architecture transforms opaque retrieval into auditable reasoning, turning the agent's internal process from a black box into a verifiable log of deterministic primitives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-07T15:04:23Z)
• Step-Aware Policy Optimization for Reasoning in Diffusion Large Language Models [57.42778606399764]
  Diffusion language models (dLLMs) offer a promising, non-autoregressive paradigm for text generation.<n>Current reinforcement learning approaches often rely on sparse, outcome-based rewards.<n>We argue that this stems from a fundamental mismatch with the natural structure of reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-02T00:34:15Z)
• Structuring Reasoning for Complex Rules Beyond Flat Representations [37.11501169845084]
  We propose a novel framework inspired by expert human reasoning processes.<n>The Dynamic Adjudication template ( DAT) structures the inference mechanism into three methodical stages.<n> DAT consistently outperforms conventional Chain-of-Thought (CoT) approaches in complex rule-based tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-01T04:10:13Z)
• On Verifiable Legal Reasoning: A Multi-Agent Framework with Formalized Knowledge Representations [0.0]
  This paper introduces a modular multi-agent framework that decomposes legal reasoning into distinct knowledge acquisition and application stages.<n>In the first stage, specialized agents extract legal concepts and formalize rules to create verifiable intermediate representations of statutes.<n>The second stage applies this knowledge to specific cases through three steps: analyzing queries to map case facts onto the schema, performing symbolic inference to derive logically entailed conclusions, and generating final answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-31T06:03:00Z)
• A Temporal FRBR/FRBRoo-Based Model for Component-Level Versioning of Legal Norms [0.0]
  This paper proposes a structured, temporal model that extends the FRBRoo framework to address this gap.<n>It introduces specialized subclasses of Expressio - Temporal Version (TV) and Language Version (LV) to represent the state of a legal norm.<n>Using the Brazilian Federal Constitution as a case study, the paper demonstrates how each amendment creates new Component Temporal Versions for affected provisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-09T15:18:36Z)
• Respecting Temporal-Causal Consistency: Entity-Event Knowledge Graphs for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [69.45495166424642]
  We develop a robust and discriminative QA benchmark to measure temporal, causal, and character consistency understanding in narrative documents.<n>We then introduce Entity-Event RAG (E2RAG), a dual-graph framework that keeps separate entity and event subgraphs linked by a bipartite mapping.<n>Across ChronoQA, our approach outperforms state-of-the-art unstructured and KG-based RAG baselines, with notable gains on causal and character consistency queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T10:07:21Z)
• A Foundational Schema.org Mapping for a Legal Knowledge Graph: Representing Brazilian Legal Norms as FRBR Works [0.0]
  Structuring legal norms for machine readability is a critical prerequisite for building advanced AI and information retrieval systems.<n>This paper proposes a mapping for the abstract legal Work to the foundational schema.org/Legislation vocabulary.<n>This structured, formal approach provides the essential first step toward creating a deterministic and verifiable knowledge graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-12T15:11:11Z)
• Incorporating Legal Structure in Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Case Study on Copyright Fair Use [44.99833362998488]
  This paper presents a domain-specific implementation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation tailored to the Fair Use Doctrine in U.S. copyright law.<n>Motivated by the increasing prevalence of DMCA takedowns and the lack of accessible legal support for content creators, we propose a structured approach that combines semantic search with legal knowledge graphs and court citation networks to improve retrieval quality and reasoning reliability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-04T15:53:49Z)
• RGL: A Graph-Centric, Modular Framework for Efficient Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Graphs [58.10503898336799]
  We introduce the RAG-on-Graphs Library (RGL), a modular framework that seamlessly integrates the complete RAG pipeline.<n>RGL addresses key challenges by supporting a variety of graph formats and integrating optimized implementations for essential components.<n>Our evaluations demonstrate that RGL not only accelerates the prototyping process but also enhances the performance and applicability of graph-based RAG systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-25T03:21:48Z)
• Bridging Legal Knowledge and AI: Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Vector Stores, Knowledge Graphs, and Hierarchical Non-negative Matrix Factorization [6.0045906216050815]
  Agentic Generative AI, powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), Knowledge Graphs (KGs), and Vector Stores (VSs)<n>This technology excels at inferring relationships within vast unstructured or semi-structured datasets.<n>We introduce a generative AI system that integrates RAG, VS, and KG, constructed via Non-Negative Matrix Factorization (NMF)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-27T18:35:39Z)
• ArchRAG: Attributed Community-based Hierarchical Retrieval-Augmented Generation [16.204046295248546]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has proven effective in integrating external knowledge into large language models. We introduce a novel graph-based RAG approach, called Attributed Community-based Hierarchical RAG (ArchRAG) We build a novel hierarchical index structure for the attributed communities and develop an effective online retrieval method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-14T03:28:36Z)
• Knowledge Graphs Construction from Criminal Court Appeals: Insights from the French Cassation Court [49.1574468325115]
  This paper presents a framework for constructing knowledge graphs from appeals to the French Cassation Court.<n>The framework includes a domain-specific ontology and a derived dataset, offering a foundation for structured legal data representation and analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-24T15:38:32Z)
• A Survey of Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Customized Large Language Models [15.190033208947051]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has emerged as a promising solution to customize large language models (LLMs)<n>This survey presents a systematic analysis of Graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation (GraphRAG)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-21T06:25:21Z)
• Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Graphs (GraphRAG) [84.29507404866257]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is a powerful technique that enhances downstream task execution by retrieving additional information.<n>Graph, by its intrinsic "nodes connected by edges" nature, encodes massive heterogeneous and relational information.<n>Unlike conventional RAG, the uniqueness of graph-structured data, such as diverse-formatted and domain-specific relational knowledge, poses unique and significant challenges when designing GraphRAG for different domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-31T06:59:35Z)
• Learning to Model Graph Structural Information on MLPs via Graph Structure Self-Contrasting [50.181824673039436]
  We propose a Graph Structure Self-Contrasting (GSSC) framework that learns graph structural information without message passing. The proposed framework is based purely on Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLPs), where the structural information is only implicitly incorporated as prior knowledge. It first applies structural sparsification to remove potentially uninformative or noisy edges in the neighborhood, and then performs structural self-contrasting in the sparsified neighborhood to learn robust node representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-09T12:56:02Z)
• Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey [28.979898837538958]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has achieved remarkable success in addressing the challenges of Large Language Models (LLMs) without necessitating retraining. This paper provides the first comprehensive overview of GraphRAG methodologies. We formalize the GraphRAG workflow, encompassing Graph-Based Indexing, Graph-Guided Retrieval, and Graph-Enhanced Generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-15T12:20:24Z)
• LawLLM: Law Large Language Model for the US Legal System [43.13850456765944]
  We introduce the Law Large Language Model (LawLLM), a multi-task model specifically designed for the US legal domain. LawLLM excels at Similar Case Retrieval (SCR), Precedent Case Recommendation (PCR), and Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) We propose customized data preprocessing techniques for each task that transform raw legal data into a trainable format.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-27T21:51:30Z)
• Bridging Local Details and Global Context in Text-Attributed Graphs [62.522550655068336]
  GraphBridge is a framework that bridges local and global perspectives by leveraging contextual textual information. Our method achieves state-of-theart performance, while our graph-aware token reduction module significantly enhances efficiency and solves scalability issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T13:35:25Z)
• Large Language Models-guided Dynamic Adaptation for Temporal Knowledge Graph Reasoning [87.10396098919013]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated extensive knowledge and remarkable proficiency in temporal reasoning.<n>We propose a Large Language Models-guided Dynamic Adaptation (LLM-DA) method for reasoning on Temporal Knowledge Graphs.<n>LLM-DA harnesses the capabilities of LLMs to analyze historical data and extract temporal logical rules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T04:54:37Z)
• Enhancing Pre-Trained Language Models with Sentence Position Embeddings for Rhetorical Roles Recognition in Legal Opinions [0.16385815610837165]
  The size of legal opinions continues to grow, making it increasingly challenging to develop a model that can accurately predict the rhetorical roles of legal opinions. We propose a novel model architecture for automatically predicting rhetorical roles using pre-trained language models (PLMs) enhanced with knowledge of sentence position information. Based on an annotated corpus from the LegalEval@SemEval2023 competition, we demonstrate that our approach requires fewer parameters, resulting in lower computational costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-08T20:33:55Z)
• Physics of Language Models: Part 1, Learning Hierarchical Language Structures [51.68385617116854]
  Transformer-based language models are effective but complex, and understanding their inner workings and reasoning mechanisms is a significant challenge.<n>We introduce a family of synthetic CFGs that produce hierarchical rules, capable of generating lengthy sentences.<n>We demonstrate that generative models like GPT can accurately learn and reason over CFG-defined hierarchies and generate sentences based on it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T04:28:16Z)
• SAILER: Structure-aware Pre-trained Language Model for Legal Case Retrieval [75.05173891207214]
  Legal case retrieval plays a core role in the intelligent legal system. Most existing language models have difficulty understanding the long-distance dependencies between different structures. We propose a new Structure-Aware pre-traIned language model for LEgal case Retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-22T10:47:01Z)
• Finding the Law: Enhancing Statutory Article Retrieval via Graph Neural Networks [3.5880535198436156]
  We propose a novel graph-augmented dense statute retriever (G-DSR) model that incorporates the structure of legislation via a graph neural network to improve dense retrieval performance. Experimental results show that our approach outperforms strong retrieval baselines on a real-world expert-annotated SAR dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-30T12:59:09Z)
• BASS: Boosting Abstractive Summarization with Unified Semantic Graph [49.48925904426591]
  BASS is a framework for Boosting Abstractive Summarization based on a unified Semantic graph. A graph-based encoder-decoder model is proposed to improve both the document representation and summary generation process. Empirical results show that the proposed architecture brings substantial improvements for both long-document and multi-document summarization tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-25T16:20:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.