Bayesian Gated Non-Negative Contrastive Learning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.28441v1
- Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 13:06:05 GMT
- Title: Bayesian Gated Non-Negative Contrastive Learning
- Abstract summary: Contrastive Learning (CL) has revolutionized self-supervised representation learning, but its latent representations remain highly entangled and opaque.<n>We propose BayesNCL (Bayesian Gated Non-Negative Contrastive Learning) to resolve this entanglement.<n>BayesNCL achieves a remarkable 142.1% improvement in semantic consistency compared to state-of-the-art baselines.
- Score: 22.531528887707804
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: While Contrastive Learning (CL) has revolutionized self-supervised representation learning, its latent representations remain highly entangled and opaque, limiting their interpretability in safety-critical applications. We identify that a fundamental cause of this entanglement is the reliance on deterministic similarity measures, which treat all feature dimensions equally. In compositional scenes, this creates an Optimization Conflict: common background features, such as, "blue sky", are encouraged to align in positive pairs but simultaneously repelled in negative pairs, causing gradient oscillations that hinder precise semantic disentanglement. To address this, we propose BayesNCL (Bayesian Gated Non-Negative Contrastive Learning). Unlike standard approaches, BayesNCL introduces a probabilistic gating mechanism that dynamically filters out task-irrelevant, high-frequency common features while selectively retaining discriminative semantics. By formalizing feature selection as a variational inference problem with a sparse Bernoulli prior, our method effectively resolves the optimization conflict. Empirical experimental results on Imagenet-100 demonstrate that BayesNCL achieves a remarkable 142.1% improvement in semantic consistency compared to state-of-the-art baselines, yielding highly interpretable representations without compromising downstream task performance. Code is available at https://github.com/Cui-Peng-624/BayesNCL.
Related papers
- C$^{2}$R: Cross-sample Consistency Regularization Mitigates Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse Autoencoders [56.67585330425431]
Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) are widely used to interpret large language models by decomposing activations into sparse, human-understandable features.<n>These issues stem from inconsistent latent assignment across samples.<n>We introduce C$2$R, which penalizes the co-activation of directionally similar latents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-29T17:45:31Z) - Too Correct to Learn: Reinforcement Learning on Saturated Reasoning Data [55.84428098924793]
We propose Constrained Uniform Top-K Sampling (CUTS), a parameter-free decoding strategy enforcing structure-preserving exploration.<n>We integrate this into Mixed-CUTS, a training framework synergizing exploitative and exploratory rollouts to amplify intra-group advantage variance.<n> Notably, Mixed-CUTS improves Pass@1 accuracy on the challenging AIME25 benchmark by up to 15.1% over standard GRPO.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-20T16:43:28Z) - Learning from Emptiness: De-biasing Listwise Rerankers with Content-Agnostic Probability Calibration [76.08899010904652]
CapCal is a training-free framework that mechanically decouples positional bias from ranking decisions.<n>It achieves superior performance among training-free methods while preserving single-pass efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-11T10:47:22Z) - Tackling Ambiguity from Perspective of Uncertainty Inference and Affinity Diversification for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentation [12.308473939796945]
Weakly supervised semantic segmentation (WSSS) with image-level labels aims to achieve dense tasks without laborious annotations.
The performance of WSSS, especially the stages of generating Class Activation Maps (CAMs) and refining pseudo masks, widely suffers from ambiguity.
We propose UniA, a unified single-staged WSSS framework, to tackle this issue from the perspective of uncertainty inference and affinity diversification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-12T01:54:59Z) - Prototypical Contrastive Learning through Alignment and Uniformity for
Recommendation [6.790779112538357]
We present underlinePrototypical contrastive learning through underlineAlignment and underlineUniformity for recommendation.
Specifically, we first propose prototypes as a latent space to ensure consistency across different augmentations from the origin graph.
The absence of explicit negatives means that directly optimizing the consistency loss between instance and prototype could easily result in dimensional collapse issues.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-03T08:19:26Z) - Neighbor-Aware Calibration of Segmentation Networks with Penalty-Based
Constraints [19.897181782914437]
We propose a principled and simple solution based on equality constraints on the logit values, which enables to control explicitly both the enforced constraint and the weight of the penalty.
Our approach can be used to train a wide span of deep segmentation networks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-25T19:46:57Z) - Towards Continual Learning Desiderata via HSIC-Bottleneck
Orthogonalization and Equiangular Embedding [55.107555305760954]
We propose a conceptually simple yet effective method that attributes forgetting to layer-wise parameter overwriting and the resulting decision boundary distortion.
Our method achieves competitive accuracy performance, even with absolute superiority of zero exemplar buffer and 1.02x the base model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-17T09:01:29Z) - Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors Mitigation [63.180725016463974]
Cross-modal retrieval relies on well-matched large-scale datasets that are laborious in practice.
We introduce a novel noisy correspondence learning framework, namely textbfSelf-textbfReinforcing textbfErrors textbfMitigation (SREM)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-27T09:03:43Z) - Identical and Fraternal Twins: Fine-Grained Semantic Contrastive
Learning of Sentence Representations [6.265789210037749]
We introduce a novel Identical and Fraternal Twins of Contrastive Learning framework, capable of simultaneously adapting to various positive pairs generated by different augmentation techniques.
We also present proof-of-concept experiments combined with the contrastive objective to prove the validity of the proposed Twins Loss.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-20T15:02:42Z) - Scalable Bayesian Meta-Learning through Generalized Implicit Gradients [64.21628447579772]
Implicit Bayesian meta-learning (iBaML) method broadens the scope of learnable priors, but also quantifies the associated uncertainty.
Analytical error bounds are established to demonstrate the precision and efficiency of the generalized implicit gradient over the explicit one.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-31T02:10:30Z) - Provable Stochastic Optimization for Global Contrastive Learning: Small
Batch Does Not Harm Performance [53.49803579981569]
We consider a global objective for contrastive learning, which contrasts each positive pair with all negative pairs for an anchor point.
Existing methods such as SimCLR requires a large batch size in order to achieve a satisfactory result.
We propose a memory-efficient optimization algorithm for solving the Global Contrastive Learning of Representations, named SogCLR.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-24T22:16:53Z) - Disentangled Contrastive Learning for Learning Robust Textual
Representations [13.880693856907037]
We introduce the concept of momentum representation consistency to align features and leverage power normalization while conforming the uniformity.
Our experimental results for the NLP benchmarks demonstrate that our approach can obtain better results compared with the baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-11T03:32:49Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.