Implicit Identity Technologies for LLMs: Fingerprinting and Watermarking across Datasets, Models, and Generated Content

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.29245v1
• Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 02:03:30 GMT
• Title: Implicit Identity Technologies for LLMs: Fingerprinting and Watermarking across Datasets, Models, and Generated Content
• Abstract summary: We introduce implicit identity as a unifying abstraction for computation but not directly observable identity signals.<n>We propose a lifecycle-based taxonomy that organises techniques across datasets, models, and generated content.
• Score: 20.58216495827901
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper presents a survey and taxonomy of LLM fingerprinting and watermarking for identity, ownership verification, provenance, and generated-content attribution. Large language models (LLMs) require substantial investments in data, computation, and expertise, and are increasingly deployed in high-stakes settings, making it critical to protect LLM-related assets and trace their origins. Existing work has rapidly expanded across dataset provenance, model ownership, and generated-content detection, but the field remains fragmented: fingerprinting and watermarking are often used inconsistently, and methods are typically studied within isolated asset-specific settings. To address this gap, we introduce implicit identity as a unifying abstraction for verifiable but not directly observable identity signals in LLM systems. We distinguish fingerprinting as non-intrusive identity derived from intrinsic characteristics, and watermarking as intrusive identity deliberately embedded into data, models, or generated content. We then propose a lifecycle-based taxonomy that organises techniques across datasets, models, and generated content, and further separates them by verification semantics: similarity-based attribution and keyed verification. Finally, we establish an evaluation framework centred on identifiability, robustness, and deployability, summarising representative metrics under realistic access and transformation regimes. By unifying terminology, lifecycle stages, and evaluation objectives, this survey provides a structured foundation for studying LLM identity technologies and for developing more reliable mechanisms for asset protection and provenance.

Related papers

• A Survey on LLM Watermarking: Theory and Deployment [10.767016439964827]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly embedded in high-impact fluent text at scale.<n>LLMs watermarking embedding invisible signatures into model outputs is a promising technical layer for attribution, auditing, and downstream trust decisions.<n>This survey provides a systematic, deployment-oriented review of LLM watermarking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-11T03:42:17Z)
• Large Language Model Sourcing: A Survey [84.63438376832471]
  Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized artificial intelligence, shifting from supporting objective tasks to empowering subjective decision-making.<n>Due to the black-box nature of LLMs and the human-like quality of their generated content, issues such as hallucinations, bias, unfairness, and copyright infringement become significant.<n>This survey presents a systematic investigation into provenance tracking for content generated by LLMs, organized around four interrelated dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-11T10:52:30Z)
• SoK: Large Language Model Copyright Auditing via Fingerprinting [69.14570598973195]
  We introduce a unified framework and formal taxonomy that categorizes existing methods into white-box and black-box approaches.<n>We propose LeaFBench, the first systematic benchmark for evaluating LLM fingerprinting under realistic deployment scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-27T12:56:57Z)
• Invisible Traces: Using Hybrid Fingerprinting to identify underlying LLMs in GenAI Apps [0.0]
  Fingerprinting of Large Language Models (LLMs) has become essential for ensuring the security and transparency of AI-integrated applications.<n>We introduce a novel fingerprinting framework designed to address these challenges by integrating static and dynamic fingerprinting techniques.<n>Our approach identifies architectural features and behavioral traits, enabling accurate and robust fingerprinting of LLMs in dynamic environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-30T19:15:41Z)
• LLM for Barcodes: Generating Diverse Synthetic Data for Identity Documents [2.697503433221448]
  We introduce a new approach to synthetic data generation that uses LLMs to create contextually rich and realistic data without relying on predefined field.<n>Our approach simplifies the process of dataset creation, eliminating the need for extensive domain knowledge.<n>This scalable, privacy-first solution is a big step forward in advancing machine learning for automated document processing and identity verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-22T14:21:18Z)
• Web-Scale Visual Entity Recognition: An LLM-Driven Data Approach [56.55633052479446]
  Web-scale visual entity recognition presents significant challenges due to the lack of clean, large-scale training data. We propose a novel methodology to curate such a dataset, leveraging a multimodal large language model (LLM) for label verification, metadata generation, and rationale explanation. Experiments demonstrate that models trained on this automatically curated data achieve state-of-the-art performance on web-scale visual entity recognition tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T06:55:24Z)
• Robust Utility-Preserving Text Anonymization Based on Large Language Models [80.5266278002083]
  Anonymizing text that contains sensitive information is crucial for a wide range of applications.<n>Existing techniques face the emerging challenges of the re-identification ability of large language models.<n>We propose a framework composed of three key components: a privacy evaluator, a utility evaluator, and an optimization component.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T14:28:56Z)
• Building Intelligence Identification System via Large Language Model Watermarking: A Survey and Beyond [35.13949723065787]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into diverse industries, posing substantial security risks due to unauthorized replication and misuse. We propose a mathematical framework based on mutual information theory, which systematizes the identification process to achieve more precise and customized watermarking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-15T07:20:02Z)
• Generative Models are Self-Watermarked: Declaring Model Authentication through Re-Generation [17.88043926057354]
  verifying data ownership poses formidable challenges, particularly in cases of unauthorized reuse of generated data. Our work is dedicated to detecting data reuse from even an individual sample. We propose an explainable verification procedure that attributes data ownership through re-generation, and further amplifies these fingerprints in the generative models through iterative data re-generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-23T10:48:21Z)
• Language Models As Semantic Indexers [78.83425357657026]
  We introduce LMIndexer, a self-supervised framework to learn semantic IDs with a generative language model. We show the high quality of the learned IDs and demonstrate their effectiveness on three tasks including recommendation, product search, and document retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-11T18:56:15Z)
• Source Attribution for Large Language Model-Generated Data [57.85840382230037]
  It is imperative to be able to perform source attribution by identifying the data provider who contributed to the generation of a synthetic text. We show that this problem can be tackled by watermarking. We propose a source attribution framework that satisfies these key properties due to our algorithmic designs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-01T12:02:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.