LLUMI: Improving LLM Writing Assistance for Mental Health Support with Online Community Feedback
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.30273v1
- Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 17:30:57 GMT
- Title: LLUMI: Improving LLM Writing Assistance for Mental Health Support with Online Community Feedback
- Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) show promise in generating supportive responses for mental health queries.<n>But improving their usefulness, empathy, and safety often requires substantial compute, expert input, and labeled data.<n>We introduce LLUMI setup that can be hosted in-house within protected environments.
- Score: 17.021867634600046
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) show promise in generating supportive responses for mental health queries, but improving their usefulness, empathy, and safety often requires substantial compute, expert input, and labeled data. At the same time, deploying proprietary, cloud-based models for mental health-related interactions raises important privacy and data-governance concerns, given the sensitivities. To address this challenge, we introduce LLUMI setup that can be hosted in-house within protected environments. LLUMI consists of two complementary components: a generation model (GM), which drafts supportive responses to mental health queries, and an improvement model (IM), which revises an initial human-crafted response. We leverage feedback signals from Reddit mental health communities, using community endorsement patterns such as upvotes and downvotes to construct chosen-rejected response pairs for Supervised Fine Tuning (SFT) and Direct Preference Optimization (DPO). We further align LLUMI using human evaluation across five dimensions: readability, empathy, connection, actionability, and safety. Our results show that, despite relying on smaller open-source models rather than proprietary cloud-based GPT models, LLUMI achieves comparable performance across linguistic analyses and human evaluations. These findings suggest that open-source models, when trained with community-derived preference signals, can support high-quality mental health support assistance while offering a more privacy-preserving alternative for sensitive support contexts.
Related papers
- Assessing the Quality of Mental Health Support in LLM Responses through Multi-Attribute Human Evaluation [14.243791046586347]
The escalating global mental health crisis, marked by persistent treatment gaps, availability, and a shortage of qualified therapists, positions Large Language Models (LLMs) as a promising avenue for scalable support.<n>This paper introduces a human-grounded evaluation methodology designed to assess LLM generated responses in therapeutic dialogue.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-26T16:04:19Z) - Enhancing the Medical Context-Awareness Ability of LLMs via Multifaceted Self-Refinement Learning [49.559151128219725]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown great promise in the medical domain, achieving strong performance on several benchmarks.<n>However, they continue to underperform in real-world medical scenarios, which often demand stronger context-awareness.<n>We propose Multifaceted Self-Refinement (MuSeR), a data-driven approach that enhances LLMs' context-awareness along three key facets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-13T08:13:23Z) - Self-Consistency as a Free Lunch: Reducing Hallucinations in Vision-Language Models via Self-Reflection [71.8243083897721]
Vision-language models often hallucinate details, generating non-existent objects or inaccurate attributes that compromise output reliability.<n>We present a novel framework that leverages the model's self-consistency between long responses and short answers to generate preference pairs for training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-27T10:37:11Z) - Beyond Empathy: Integrating Diagnostic and Therapeutic Reasoning with Large Language Models for Mental Health Counseling [50.83055329849865]
PsyLLM is a large language model designed to integrate diagnostic and therapeutic reasoning for mental health counseling.<n>It processes real-world mental health posts from Reddit and generates multi-turn dialogue structures.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that PsyLLM significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baseline models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-21T16:24:49Z) - ProMind-LLM: Proactive Mental Health Care via Causal Reasoning with Sensor Data [5.961343130822046]
Mental health risk is a critical global public health challenge.<n>With the development of large language models (LLMs), they stand out to be a promising tool for explainable mental health care applications.<n>This paper introduces ProMind-LLM, an innovative approach integrating objective behavior data as complementary information alongside subjective mental records.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-20T07:36:28Z) - Leveraging LLMs for Mental Health: Detection and Recommendations from Social Discussions [0.5249805590164902]
We propose a comprehensive framework that leverages Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Generative AI techniques to identify and assess mental health disorders.<n>We use rule-based labeling methods as well as advanced pre-trained NLP models to extract nuanced semantic features from the data.<n>We fine-tune domain-adapted and generic pre-trained NLP models based on predictions from specialized Large Language Models (LLMs) to improve classification accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-03T11:48:01Z) - FedMentalCare: Towards Privacy-Preserving Fine-Tuned LLMs to Analyze Mental Health Status Using Federated Learning Framework [0.0]
FedCare is a privacy-preserving framework for deploying Large Language Models (LLMs) in mental healthcare applications.<n>Our framework demonstrates a scalable, privacy-aware approach for deploying LLMs in real-world mental healthcare scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-27T07:04:19Z) - LlaMADRS: Prompting Large Language Models for Interview-Based Depression Assessment [75.44934940580112]
This study introduces LlaMADRS, a novel framework leveraging open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate depression severity assessment.<n>We employ a zero-shot prompting strategy with carefully designed cues to guide the model in interpreting and scoring transcribed clinical interviews.<n>Our approach, tested on 236 real-world interviews, demonstrates strong correlations with clinician assessments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-07T08:49:04Z) - Bi-Factorial Preference Optimization: Balancing Safety-Helpfulness in Language Models [94.39278422567955]
Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) on human preferences has proven successful in enhancing their capabilities.<n>However, ensuring the safety of LLMs during fine-tuning remains a critical concern.<n>We propose a supervised learning framework called Bi-Factorial Preference Optimization (BFPO) to address this issue.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-27T17:31:21Z) - Can AI Relate: Testing Large Language Model Response for Mental Health Support [23.97212082563385]
Large language models (LLMs) are already being piloted for clinical use in hospital systems like NYU Langone, Dana-Farber and the NHS.
We develop an evaluation framework for determining whether LLM response is a viable and ethical path forward for the automation of mental health treatment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-20T13:42:27Z) - Principle-Driven Self-Alignment of Language Models from Scratch with
Minimal Human Supervision [84.31474052176343]
Recent AI-assistant agents, such as ChatGPT, rely on supervised fine-tuning (SFT) with human annotations and reinforcement learning from human feedback to align the output with human intentions.
This dependence can significantly constrain the true potential of AI-assistant agents due to the high cost of obtaining human supervision.
We propose a novel approach called SELF-ALIGN, which combines principle-driven reasoning and the generative power of LLMs for the self-alignment of AI agents with minimal human supervision.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-04T17:59:28Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.