Neural Posterior Estimation for Stochastic Epidemic Models Using Final Outcome Data
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02874v1
- Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2026 20:40:27 GMT
- Title: Neural Posterior Estimation for Stochastic Epidemic Models Using Final Outcome Data
- Abstract summary: We show that a logNormal posterior approximation, parameterised by a feed-forward neural network, accurately recovers reference posteriors across a range of population sizes and transmission regimes.<n>Performance on both synthetic and real outbreak datasets is consistently strong.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Neural posterior estimation (NPE) is a simulation-based approach to Bayesian inference that trains a neural network to approximate the posterior distribution from simulated parameter - data pairs, bypassing likelihood evaluation. We apply NPE -- to our knowledge for the first time -- to stochastic susceptible-infectious-removed (SIR) epidemic models observed through final outcome data, considering both homogeneously mixing and household-structured populations. Such data arise naturally in retrospective outbreak investigations and household transmission studies, yet inference is computationally challenging: data-augmentation Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) can be slow to mix in large populations and difficult to implement, while Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) suffers from low acceptance rates, particularly for large populations or unlikely outcomes. The discrete, low-dimensional nature of such observations makes this setting particularly well suited to NPE. We show that a logNormal posterior approximation, parameterised by a feed-forward neural network, accurately recovers reference posteriors across a range of population sizes and transmission regimes, and extends naturally to joint inference on global and local transmission rates in the household model. Once trained, the network produces approximate posterior distributions in seconds and generalises reliably to population sizes and structures not seen during training. Performance on both synthetic and real outbreak datasets is consistently strong, with results in close agreement with published analyses.
Related papers
- From Atoms to Entropy: Optimal Noise Allocation for Diffusion Training in the Convex Regime [52.459513910242485]
We develop a general statistical framework for studying optimal noise-level allocation in diffusion training.<n>We show that the optimized training schedule admits an atomic minimizer, concentrated on finitely many noise levels.<n>We then evaluate the entropic schedule in larger-scale experiments, where full schedule optimization is currently intractable.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-10T20:59:06Z) - Distributionally Faithful Imputation via Positive Semi-Definite Kernel Density Estimation [55.47411235954028]
We recast imputation under missing completely at random as density estimation from masked observations.<n>We obtain a convex empirical risk problem with closed form marginals, solvable by a Newton interior point method.<n>The resulting PSD Impute model yields both single and multiple imputations from the same fitted density.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-08T15:51:05Z) - Preconditioned Robust Neural Posterior Estimation for Misspecified Simulators [0.0]
We study preconditioning under misspecification and propose preconditioned robust neural posterior estimation.<n>We demonstrate that preconditioning combined with robust NPE increases stability and improves accuracy, calibration, and posterior-predictive fit over standard baseline methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-20T05:32:35Z) - A Simple Approximate Bayesian Inference Neural Surrogate for Stochastic Petri Net Models [0.0]
We introduce a neural-network-based approximation of the posterior distribution framework.<n>Our model employs a lightweight 1D Convolutional Residual Network trained end-to-end on Gillespie-simulated SPN realizations.<n>On synthetic SPNs with 20% missing events, our surrogate recovers rate-function coefficients with an RMSE = 0.108 and substantially runs faster than traditional Bayesian approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-14T18:31:19Z) - A variational neural Bayes framework for inference on intractable posterior distributions [1.0801976288811024]
Posterior distributions of model parameters are efficiently obtained by feeding observed data into a trained neural network.
We show theoretically that our posteriors converge to the true posteriors in Kullback-Leibler divergence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-16T20:40:15Z) - Towards Theoretical Understandings of Self-Consuming Generative Models [56.84592466204185]
This paper tackles the emerging challenge of training generative models within a self-consuming loop.
We construct a theoretical framework to rigorously evaluate how this training procedure impacts the data distributions learned by future models.
We present results for kernel density estimation, delivering nuanced insights such as the impact of mixed data training on error propagation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-19T02:08:09Z) - Deep Neural Networks Tend To Extrapolate Predictably [51.303814412294514]
neural network predictions tend to be unpredictable and overconfident when faced with out-of-distribution (OOD) inputs.
We observe that neural network predictions often tend towards a constant value as input data becomes increasingly OOD.
We show how one can leverage our insights in practice to enable risk-sensitive decision-making in the presence of OOD inputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-02T03:25:32Z) - Discrepancies in Epidemiological Modeling of Aggregated Heterogeneous
Data [1.433758865948252]
We show that state-of-the-art models for estimating epidemiological parameters, e.g.transmission rates, can be inappropriate when faced with complex systems.
We generate three complex outbreak scenarios by combining incidence curves from multiple epidemics.
We evaluate two data-generating models within this Bayesian inference framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-20T03:41:19Z) - Rapid Risk Minimization with Bayesian Models Through Deep Learning
Approximation [9.93116974480156]
We introduce a novel combination of Bayesian Models (BMs) and Neural Networks (NNs) for making predictions with a minimum expected risk.
Our approach combines the data efficiency and interpretability of a BM with the speed of a NN.
We achieve risk minimized predictions significantly faster than standard methods with a negligible loss on the testing dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-29T15:08:25Z) - Improving Uncertainty Calibration via Prior Augmented Data [56.88185136509654]
Neural networks have proven successful at learning from complex data distributions by acting as universal function approximators.
They are often overconfident in their predictions, which leads to inaccurate and miscalibrated probabilistic predictions.
We propose a solution by seeking out regions of feature space where the model is unjustifiably overconfident, and conditionally raising the entropy of those predictions towards that of the prior distribution of the labels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-22T07:02:37Z) - DeepRite: Deep Recurrent Inverse TreatmEnt Weighting for Adjusting
Time-varying Confounding in Modern Longitudinal Observational Data [68.29870617697532]
We propose Deep Recurrent Inverse TreatmEnt weighting (DeepRite) for time-varying confounding in longitudinal data.
DeepRite is shown to recover the ground truth from synthetic data, and estimate unbiased treatment effects from real data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-28T15:05:08Z) - Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under
Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation.
We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.