FinStressTS: A Parametric Synthetic Benchmark for Time-Series Forecasting in Finance

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03184v1
• Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2026 05:41:50 GMT
• Title: FinStressTS: A Parametric Synthetic Benchmark for Time-Series Forecasting in Finance
• Abstract summary: FinStressTS is a mechanism-aware benchmark that links model behavior to controlled structural causes.<n>Financial forecasting is difficult due to low signal-to-noise ratios, latent factors, heavy tails, regime shifts, and jumps.
• Score: 3.5492452247462185
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Financial forecasting is difficult due to low signal-to-noise ratios, latent factors, heavy tails, regime shifts, and jumps. Real-world benchmarks offer limited failure attribution: researchers can observe underperformance, but often cannot isolate why because mechanisms are unobservable and entangled. Real financial data reveal only one realized path, making it difficult to assess tail-risk calibration or data efficiency. We introduce FinStressTS, a mechanism-aware synthetic benchmark that links model behavior to controlled structural causes. FinStressTS comprises 30 diagnostic environments around six mechanism families: volatility clustering, multi-scale persistence, heavy-tailed shocks, regime switching, self-exciting jumps, and zero-inflated processes. We evaluate two tasks: point forecasting, using NMAE across five settings, and probabilistic forecasting, using CRPS under known data-generating mechanisms. We benchmark 15 models, from classical methods (HAR, VAR) to Transformer forecasters (PatchTST, iTransformer) and deep probabilistic architectures (DeepAR, TSFlow), and use learning curves to measure sample efficiency. Our evaluation reveals three insights. First, performance is mechanism-dependent: autoregressive and linear models are highly competitive, and often outperform Transformer-based models, in several volatility-, tail-, and jump-driven environments. Second, distributional alignment matters: parametric probabilistic models such as DeepAR calibrate well in stationary settings, while flexible models can help when distributions become multimodal or sparse. Third, neural models often require more data to match simple baselines, with larger gains mainly when learning latent regimes or complex distributions. FinStressTS provides an open framework for diagnosing failure modes and advancing risk-aware forecasting.

Related papers

• Regime-Gated Residual Mixture-of-Experts for Cross-Sectional Volatility Forecasting [2.4235475271758076]
  We study five-day realized-volatility forecasts for 1,027 U.S. equities using a walk-forward evaluation framework.<n>We propose RG-ResMoE, a regime-gated residual mixture-of-experts architecture.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-12T16:51:51Z)
• PnP-Corrector: A Universal Correction Framework for Coupled Spatiotemporal Forecasting [62.22445401483844]
  Existing methods are severely constrained by the bottleneck of compounding errors.<n>We propose a universal framework called -Cast-Corrector (Plug-and-Play Corrector)<n>Our method significantly enhances the long-term stability of coupled forecasting systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-09T13:12:33Z)
• Synthetic Financial Data Generation for Enhanced Financial Modelling [0.0]
  This paper presents a unified multi-criteria evaluation framework for synthetic financial data.<n>Using historical S and P 500 daily data, we evaluate fidelity (Maximum Mean Discrepancy, MMD), temporal structure (autocorrelation and volatility clustering), and practical utility in downstream tasks.<n>We articulate practical guidelines for selecting generative models according to application needs and computational constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-25T21:43:16Z)
• Robust Probabilistic Load Forecasting for a Single Household: A Comparative Study from SARIMA to Transformers on the REFIT Dataset [0.0]
  This paper tackles the challenge using the volatile REFIT household dataset.<n>We first address this by conducting a rigorous comparative experiment to select a Seasonal Imputation method.<n>We then systematically evaluate a hierarchy of models, progressing from classical baselines to machine learning.<n>Our findings reveal that classical models fail to capture the data's non-linear, regime-switching behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-30T12:05:18Z)
• Agentic World Modeling for 6G: Near-Real-Time Generative State-Space Reasoning [70.56067503630486]
  We argue that sixth-generation (6G) intelligence is not fluent token prediction but calibrated the capacity to imagine and choose.<n>We show that WM-MS3M cuts mean absolute error (MAE) by 1.69% versus MS3M with 32% fewer parameters and similar latency, and achieves 35-80% lower root mean squared error (RMSE) than attention/hybrid baselines with 2.3-4.1x faster inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-04T17:22:22Z)
• Revisiting Multivariate Time Series Forecasting with Missing Values [65.30332997607141]
  Missing values are common in real-world time series.<n>Current approaches have developed an imputation-then-prediction framework that uses imputation modules to fill in missing values, followed by forecasting on the imputed data.<n>This framework overlooks a critical issue: there is no ground truth for the missing values, making the imputation process susceptible to errors that can degrade prediction accuracy.<n>We introduce Consistency-Regularized Information Bottleneck (CRIB), a novel framework built on the Information Bottleneck principle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-27T20:57:48Z)
• Beyond Model Ranking: Predictability-Aligned Evaluation for Time Series Forecasting [18.018179328110048]
  We introduce a predictability-aligned diagnostic framework grounded in spectral coherence.<n>We provide the first systematic evidence of "predictability drift", demonstrating that a task's forecasting difficulty varies sharply over time.<n>Our evaluation reveals a key architectural trade-off: complex models are superior for low-predictability data, whereas linear models are highly effective on more predictable tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-27T02:56:06Z)
• T3Time: Tri-Modal Time Series Forecasting via Adaptive Multi-Head Alignment and Residual Fusion [0.4915744683251151]
  T3Time is a novel trimodal framework consisting of time, spectral, and prompt branches.<n>It learns prioritization between temporal and spectral features based on the prediction horizon.<n>Our model consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-06T09:31:44Z)
• Elucidated Rolling Diffusion Models for Probabilistic Weather Forecasting [52.6508222408558]
  We introduce Elucidated Rolling Diffusion Models (ERDM)<n>ERDM is the first framework to unify a rolling forecast structure with the principled, performant design of Elucidated Diffusion Models (EDM)<n>On 2D Navier-Stokes simulations and ERA5 global weather forecasting at 1.5circ resolution, ERDM consistently outperforms key diffusion-based baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-24T21:44:31Z)
• XRMDN: An Extended Recurrent Mixture Density Network for Short-Term Probabilistic Rider Demand Forecasting with High Volatility [16.047461063459846]
  We propose an Extended Recurrent Mixture Density Network (XRMDN) to process demand residuals and variance through correlated modules. XRMDN adeptly captures demand trends, thus significantly enhancing forecasting precision, particularly in high-volatility scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-15T14:18:42Z)
• Towards Long-Term Time-Series Forecasting: Feature, Pattern, and Distribution [57.71199089609161]
  Long-term time-series forecasting (LTTF) has become a pressing demand in many applications, such as wind power supply planning. Transformer models have been adopted to deliver high prediction capacity because of the high computational self-attention mechanism. We propose an efficient Transformerbased model, named Conformer, which differentiates itself from existing methods for LTTF in three aspects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-05T13:59:29Z)
• Distributionally Robust Models with Parametric Likelihood Ratios [123.05074253513935]
  Three simple ideas allow us to train models with DRO using a broader class of parametric likelihood ratios. We find that models trained with the resulting parametric adversaries are consistently more robust to subpopulation shifts when compared to other DRO approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-13T12:43:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.