Gender-Dependent Diagnostic Substitution in LLM Medical Triage: Same Symptoms, Unequal Urgency
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03641v1
- Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2026 13:35:12 GMT
- Title: Gender-Dependent Diagnostic Substitution in LLM Medical Triage: Same Symptoms, Unequal Urgency
- Abstract summary: We investigate whether large language models produce different medical triage recommendations for identical neurological symptoms when only the patient's gender and age vary.<n>We present a standardized symptom profile across seven demographic conditions.<n>We find a stark, systemic gender-dependent triage disparity.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: We investigate whether large language models produce different medical triage recommendations for identical neurological symptoms when only the patient's stated gender and age vary. Using three model families--Gemini 3.5 Flash, Claude Sonnet 4.6, and GPT-5.4-mini--we present a standardized symptom profile (persistent headache, blurred vision, morning nausea, visual disturbances) across seven demographic conditions: three age groups (25, 38, 65) x two genders (male, female), plus a gender-unspecified baseline (n = 30 per condition per model, 630 total trials). We find a stark, systemic gender-dependent triage disparity: young women receive significantly lower emergency room (ER) referral rates than age-matched men (Gemini: 0% vs. 23.3%; Claude: 6.7% vs. 96.7%; GPT: 6.7% vs. 66.7%, all p < 0.001). The disparity disappears at age 65 for all models. The primary mechanism is diagnostic substitution: the models anchor on a gender-associated diagnosis, preferentially classifying young women with Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension (IIH)--a condition epidemiologically linked to women of childbearing age--while diagnosing men with generic increased intracranial pressure with space-occupying lesions in the differential. This diagnostic closure routes female patients to lower-urgency care (outpatient doctor appointments) despite comparable severity ratings (7-9/10). Our findings demonstrate that clinical LLMs replicate documented human clinical biases by using epidemiological priors to suppress triage urgency, suggesting that AI triage engines must decouple urgency assessment from probabilistic diagnostic priors. We release all code, prompts, and raw results.
Related papers
- Auditable agentic AI for evidence-grounded thyroid ultrasound diagnosis and reporting [59.709162055944915]
ThyroidXAgent is an agentic AI system that coordinates specialized diagnostic tools and stores their outputs as an auditable case-level evidence record.<n>It was evaluated on 28,458 non-overlapping test cases, including 8,721 cases from 35 centres in the private NHC-MISD-TUS cohort.<n>It achieved a mean Dice score of 87.21 percent for segmentation and a mean AUROC of 0.9466 for benign-malignant classification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-12T21:02:59Z) - RareLens: Towards End-to-End Rare Disease Care via Aligning Divergent Large Language Model Reasoning [42.80742579670377]
RareLens is a system that supports clinical decision-making across the entire rare disease trajectory.<n>Developed and evaluated on RareBench, a real-world dataset of 157,525 cases spanning all 33 Orphanet categories and more than 7,000 conditions.<n>It achieved an area under the curve of 0.917 for screening and top-1 accuracies of 65.5% and 89.8% for diagnosis and treatment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-25T16:58:10Z) - EQUITRIAGE: A Fairness Audit of Gender Bias in LLM-Based Emergency Department Triage [0.0]
We present EQUITRIAGE, a fairness audit of large language models (LLMs) in emergency departments.<n>All five models produced flip rates above a pre-registered 5% threshold.<n>Group parity, counterfactual invariance, and gender calibration are distinct fairness properties.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-05T17:20:55Z) - PsychBench: Auditing Epidemiological Fidelity in Large Language Model Mental Health Simulations [0.0]
Large language models are increasingly deployed to simulate patients for clinical training, research, and mental health tools.<n>We introduce PsychBench, the first epidemiological audit of LLM patient simulation.<n>We show that models produce clinically plausible individuals while misrepresenting the populations they are drawn from.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-19T10:05:25Z) - PanCanBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Pancreatic Oncology [48.732366302949515]
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved expert-level performance on standardized examinations, yet multiple-choice accuracy poorly reflects real-world clinical utility and safety.<n>We developed a human-in-the-loop pipeline to create expert rubrics for de-identified patient questions.<n>We evaluated 22 proprietary and open-source LLMs using an LLM-as-a-judge framework, measuring clinical completeness, factual accuracy, and web-search integration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-02T00:50:39Z) - Evaluating the Presence of Sex Bias in Clinical Reasoning by Large Language Models [0.5872014229110214]
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly embedded in healthcare for documentation, education, and clinical decision support.<n>We examined whether contemporary LLMs exhibit sex-specific biases in clinical reasoning and how model configuration influences these behaviours.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-04T10:21:38Z) - Epistemic-aware Vision-Language Foundation Model for Fetal Ultrasound Interpretation [83.02147613524032]
We introduce FetalMind, a medical AI system tailored to fetal ultrasound for both report generation and diagnosis.<n>We propose Salient Epistemic Disentanglement (SED), which injects an expert-curated bipartite graph into the model to decouple view-disease associations.<n>FetalMind outperforms open- and closed-source baselines across all gestational stages, achieving +14% average gains and +61.2% higher accuracy on critical conditions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-14T19:57:03Z) - Medical Hallucinations in Foundation Models and Their Impact on Healthcare [71.15392179084428]
Hallucinations in foundation models arise from autoregressive training objectives.<n>Top-performing models exceeded 97% accuracy when augmented with chain-of-thought prompting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-26T02:30:44Z) - Sex-based Disparities in Brain Aging: A Focus on Parkinson's Disease [2.1506382989223782]
Despite previous research, there remains a significant gap in understanding the function of sex in the process of brain aging in PD patients.
The T1-weighted MRI-driven brain-predicted age difference was computed in a group of 373 PD patients from the PPMI database.
In the propensity score-matched PD male group, brain-PAD was found to be associated with a decline in general cognition, a worse degree of sleep behavior disorder, reduced visuospatial, and caudate atrophy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-18T18:35:54Z) - Prostate Age Gap (PAG): An MRI surrogate marker of aging for prostate
cancer detection [0.15518894748362708]
The Prostate Age Gap (PAG) was significantly associated with the risk of clinically significant PC (csPC) and outperformed other well-established PC risk factors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-10T05:20:25Z) - Generative models improve fairness of medical classifiers under
distribution shifts [49.10233060774818]
We show that learning realistic augmentations automatically from data is possible in a label-efficient manner using generative models.
We demonstrate that these learned augmentations can surpass ones by making models more robust and statistically fair in- and out-of-distribution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-18T18:15:38Z) - IA-GCN: Interpretable Attention based Graph Convolutional Network for
Disease prediction [47.999621481852266]
We propose an interpretable graph learning-based model which interprets the clinical relevance of the input features towards the task.
In a clinical scenario, such a model can assist the clinical experts in better decision-making for diagnosis and treatment planning.
Our proposed model shows superior performance with respect to compared methods with an increase in an average accuracy of 3.2% for Tadpole, 1.6% for UKBB Gender, and 2% for the UKBB Age prediction task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-29T13:04:02Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.