From Symbolic to Geometric: Enabling Spatial Reasoning in Large Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04381v1
- Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2026 02:54:59 GMT
- Title: From Symbolic to Geometric: Enabling Spatial Reasoning in Large Language Models
- Abstract summary: Recent large language models (LLMs) often appear to exhibit spatial reasoning ability.<n>This capability is largely emphsymbolic, arising from pattern matching over spatial language rather than true emphgeometric reasoning over space.<n>We introduce the emphSpatial Language Model (SLM), the first multimodal LLM that treats location information as a first-class modality.
- Score: 12.689909494554733
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Recent large language models (LLMs) often appear to exhibit spatial reasoning ability; however, this capability is largely \emph{symbolic}, arising from pattern matching over spatial language rather than true \emph{geometric} reasoning over space. Because LLMs operate on discrete tokens, they lack native support for continuous spatial representations, explicit geometric computation, and structured spatial operators. To address this limitation, we introduce the \emph{Spatial Language Model (SLM)}, the first multimodal LLM that treats location information as a first-class modality and enables geometric spatial reasoning within the model's inference process. SLM directly operates on learned spatial representations rather than textual descriptions of spatial relations. To support effective training, we construct a \emph{Spatial Instruction Dataset} that aligns spatial representations, atomic geometric operations, and natural language instructions. We further propose a new benchmark named \emph{SpatialEval}, which is designed to evaluate spatial reasoning across attributes, distance, topology, and relative-position tasks. Extensive experiments show that SLM significantly outperforms existing LLM-based approaches that rely on symbolic reasoning via prompt engineering or textual abstraction, demonstrating the benefits of integrating geometric spatial representations for robust spatial reasoning. Our instruction dataset, evaluation benchmark, model training codes, and models' checkpoints can be found at: \hyperlink{https://github.com/chuchen2017/SLM}{https://github.com/chuchen2017/SLM}.
Related papers
- SpatialGeo:Boosting Spatial Reasoning in Multimodal LLMs via Geometry-Semantics Fusion [23.86761713752287]
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have achieved significant progress in image and language tasks.<n>Most MLLMs suffer from limited spatial reasoning ability to interpret and infer spatial arrangements in three-dimensional space.<n>We propose a novel vision encoder based on hierarchical fusion of geometry and semantics features, generating spatial-aware visual embedding.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-21T15:24:33Z) - Spatial Preference Rewarding for MLLMs Spatial Understanding [92.25703021388142]
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated promising spatial understanding capabilities.<n>Despite their successes, MLLMs still fall short in fine-grained spatial perception abilities.<n>We propose a Spatial Preference Rewarding(SPR) approach that enhances MLLMs' spatial capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-16T07:16:18Z) - Hyperbolic Large Language Models [7.483401973996036]
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success and demonstrated superior performance across various tasks.<n>However, many real-world data exhibit highly non-Euclidean latent hierarchical anatomy, such as protein networks, transportation networks, financial networks, brain networks, and linguistic structures or syntactic trees in natural languages.<n>We provide a comprehensive and contextual exposition of recent advancements in LLMs that leverage hyperbolic geometry as a representation space to enhance semantic representation learning and multi-scale reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-06T15:56:46Z) - Understanding Space Is Rocket Science -- Only Top Reasoning Models Can Solve Spatial Understanding Tasks [9.23437069873238]
We propose an open-source contrastive VLM benchmark that tests for spatial relation understanding.<n>RocketScience is comprised of entirely new real-world image-text pairs.<n>Results show a striking lack of spatial relation understanding in open source and frontier commercial VLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-02T10:32:58Z) - FloorplanQA: A Benchmark for Spatial Reasoning in LLMs using Structured Representations [78.65988445433844]
FloorplanQA is a diagnostic benchmark for evaluating spatial reasoning in large-language models.<n>The benchmark covers core spatial tasks, including distance measurement, visibility, path finding, and object placement within constrained spaces.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-10T11:16:48Z) - A Neural Representation Framework with LLM-Driven Spatial Reasoning for Open-Vocabulary 3D Visual Grounding [78.99798110890157]
Open-vocabulary 3D visual grounding aims to localize target objects based on free-form language queries.<n>Existing language field methods struggle to accurately localize instances using spatial relations in language queries.<n>We propose SpatialReasoner, a novel neural representation-based framework with large language model (LLM)-driven spatial reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-09T10:20:38Z) - Can LLMs Learn to Map the World from Local Descriptions? [50.490593949836146]
This study investigates whether Large Language Models (LLMs) can construct coherent global spatial cognition.<n> Experiments conducted in a simulated urban environment demonstrate that LLMs exhibit latent representations aligned with real-world spatial distributions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-27T08:22:58Z) - Mind the Gap: Benchmarking Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models [14.442394137843923]
We present a detailed analysis that first delineates the core elements of spatial reasoning.<n>We then assesses the performance of these models in both synthetic and real-world images.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-25T14:34:06Z) - SpaRC and SpaRP: Spatial Reasoning Characterization and Path Generation for Understanding Spatial Reasoning Capability of Large Language Models [70.01883340129204]
spatial reasoning is a crucial component of both biological and artificial intelligence.
We present a comprehensive study of the capability of current state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) on spatial reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-07T01:06:34Z) - Spatial Pyramid Based Graph Reasoning for Semantic Segmentation [67.47159595239798]
We apply graph convolution into the semantic segmentation task and propose an improved Laplacian.
The graph reasoning is directly performed in the original feature space organized as a spatial pyramid.
We achieve comparable performance with advantages in computational and memory overhead.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-23T12:28:07Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.