Agent-Orchestrated Adaptive RAG: A Comparative Study on Structured and Multi-Hop Retrieval

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05658v1
• Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2026 03:38:46 GMT
• Title: Agent-Orchestrated Adaptive RAG: A Comparative Study on Structured and Multi-Hop Retrieval
• Abstract summary: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances Large Language Models (LLMs) by grounding their responses in external knowledge.<n>This paper presents an Agent-Orchestrated Adaptive RAG framework that introduces dynamic query decomposition, iterative retrieval, and a bounded self-reflective evaluation loop.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances Large Language Models (LLMs) by grounding their responses in external knowledge, but conventional pipelines rely on static, single-step retrieval that limits performance on complex queries. This paper presents an Agent-Orchestrated Adaptive RAG framework that introduces dynamic query decomposition, iterative retrieval, and a bounded self-reflective evaluation loop. We evaluate the system across two complementary datasets: a domain-specific DevOps knowledge base and the multi-hop reasoning benchmark MuSiQue. Using metrics that include overall score, citation accuracy, mean reciprocal rank, and topic coverage, we find that query decomposition yields consistent gains in the structured domain (overall score $+0.04$, MRR $+0.17$ on DevOps) but degrades ranking precision on the multi-hop benchmark, while the reflection mechanism improves citation accuracy at a substantial latency cost. These contrasting results show that agentic enhancements are not universally beneficial and must be applied selectively according to query and domain characteristics. Our findings argue for adaptive, cost-aware orchestration rather than uniformly aggressive reasoning pipelines.

Related papers

• TRACE: A Unified Rollout Budget Allocation Framework for Efficient Agentic Reinforcement Learning [52.67756371231985]
  Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) is a promising approach for enhancing reasoning and agentic behavior in large language models.<n>We introduce Tree Rollout Allocation for Contrastive Exploration (TRACE), a unified rollout allocation framework.<n>Technically, TRACE allocates rollout budget to both prompt roots and intermediate prefixes that are most likely to yield mixed terminal rewards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-09T17:16:03Z)
• R$^3$AG: Retriever Routing for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [59.47703698994575]
  R$3$AG decomposes retriever capability into two learnable dimensions: retrieval quality and generation utility.<n>R$3$AG consistently outperforms both the best individual retrievers and state-of-the-art static routing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-22T06:51:20Z)
• RAGRouter-Bench: A Dataset and Benchmark for Adaptive RAG Routing [37.7721677767453]
  We introduce RAG-Bench, the first dataset and benchmark designed for adaptive RAG routing.<n>RAG-Bench revisits retrieval from a query-corpus compatibility perspective and standardizes five representative RAG paradigms for systematic evaluation.<n> Experiments with DeepSeek-V3 and LLaMA-3.1-8B demonstrate that no single RAG paradigm is universally optimal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T20:38:11Z)
• Is Agentic RAG worth it? An experimental comparison of RAG approaches [0.07777489763207261]
  "Retrieval-Augmented Generation" systems are usually defined by the combination of a generator and a retrieval component.<n>These shortcomings have motivated the development of "Enhanced" RAG.<n>The growing self-reflective capabilities of Large Language Models have enabled a new paradigm, which we refer to as "Agentic" RAG.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T16:43:44Z)
• RAGalyst: Automated Human-Aligned Agentic Evaluation for Domain-Specific RAG [0.0]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a critical technique for grounding Large Language Models (LLMs) in factual evidence.<n>Existing evaluation frameworks often rely on metrics that fail to capture domain-specific nuances.<n>This paper introduces RAGalyst, an automated, human-aligned agentic framework designed for the rigorous evaluation of domain-specific RAG systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-06T16:22:52Z)
• Improving Consistency in Retrieval-Augmented Systems with Group Similarity Rewards [14.535325886547112]
  RAG systems are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains where users expect outputs to be consistent across semantically equivalent queries.<n>Existing systems often exhibit significant inconsistencies due to variability in both the retriever and generator.<n>We introduce a principled evaluation framework that decomposes RAG consistency into retriever-level, generator-level, and end-to-end components.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-05T23:14:13Z)
• Learning to Route: A Rule-Driven Agent Framework for Hybrid-Source Retrieval-Augmented Generation [55.47971671635531]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance on general Question Answering (QA)<n>Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) addresses this limitation by enriching LLMs with external knowledge.<n>Existing systems primarily rely on unstructured documents, while largely overlooking relational databases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T22:19:44Z)
• CompassVerifier: A Unified and Robust Verifier for LLMs Evaluation and Outcome Reward [50.97588334916863]
  We develop CompassVerifier, an accurate and robust lightweight verifier model for evaluation and outcome reward.<n>It demonstrates multi-domain competency spanning math, knowledge, and diverse reasoning tasks, with the capability to process various answer types.<n>We introduce VerifierBench benchmark comprising model outputs collected from multiple data sources, augmented through manual analysis of metaerror patterns to enhance CompassVerifier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-05T17:55:24Z)
• Investigating the Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation at the Query Level [4.3028340012580975]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has been proposed as a solution that dynamically incorporates external knowledge during inference.<n>Despite its promise, RAG systems face practical challenges-most notably, a strong dependence on the quality of the input query for accurate retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-09T15:39:17Z)
• Attributing Response to Context: A Jensen-Shannon Divergence Driven Mechanistic Study of Context Attribution in Retrieval-Augmented Generation [52.3707788779464]
  We introduce a novel Jensen-Shannon Divergence driven method to Attribute Response to Context (ARC-JSD)<n>ARC-JSD enables efficient and accurate identification of essential context sentences without additional fine-tuning, gradient-calculation or surrogate modelling.<n> Evaluations on a wide range of RAG benchmarks, such as TyDi QA, Hotpot QA, and Musique, using instruction-tuned LLMs in different scales demonstrate superior accuracy and significant computational efficiency improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T09:04:03Z)
• Retrieval is Not Enough: Enhancing RAG Reasoning through Test-Time Critique and Optimization [58.390885294401066]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has become a widely adopted paradigm for enabling knowledge-grounded large language models (LLMs)<n>RAG pipelines often fail to ensure that model reasoning remains consistent with the evidence retrieved, leading to factual inconsistencies or unsupported conclusions.<n>We propose AlignRAG, a novel iterative framework grounded in Critique-Driven Alignment (CDA)<n>We introduce AlignRAG-auto, an autonomous variant that dynamically terminates refinement, removing the need to pre-specify the number of critique iterations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T04:56:47Z)
• On the Role of Feedback in Test-Time Scaling of Agentic AI Workflows [71.92083784393418]
  Agentic AI (systems that autonomously plan and act) are becoming widespread, yet their task success rate on complex tasks remains low.<n>Inference-time alignment relies on three components: sampling, evaluation, and feedback.<n>We introduce Iterative Agent Decoding (IAD), a procedure that repeatedly inserts feedback extracted from different forms of critiques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-02T17:40:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.