Improving Consistency in Retrieval-Augmented Systems with Group Similarity Rewards

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.04392v1
• Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2025 23:14:13 GMT
• Title: Improving Consistency in Retrieval-Augmented Systems with Group Similarity Rewards
• Authors: Faisal Hamman, Chenyang Zhu, Anoop Kumar, Xujun Peng, Sanghamitra Dutta, Daben Liu, Alfy Samuel,
• Abstract summary: RAG systems are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains where users expect outputs to be consistent across semantically equivalent queries.<n>Existing systems often exhibit significant inconsistencies due to variability in both the retriever and generator.<n>We introduce a principled evaluation framework that decomposes RAG consistency into retriever-level, generator-level, and end-to-end components.
• Score: 14.535325886547112
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: RAG systems are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains where users expect outputs to be consistent across semantically equivalent queries. However, existing systems often exhibit significant inconsistencies due to variability in both the retriever and generator (LLM), undermining trust and reliability. In this work, we focus on information consistency, i.e., the requirement that outputs convey the same core content across semantically equivalent inputs. We introduce a principled evaluation framework that decomposes RAG consistency into retriever-level, generator-level, and end-to-end components, helping identify inconsistency sources. To improve consistency, we propose Paraphrased Set Group Relative Policy Optimization (PS-GRPO), an RL approach that leverages multiple rollouts across paraphrased set to assign group similarity rewards. We leverage PS-GRPO to achieve Information Consistent RAG (Con-RAG), training the generator to produce consistent outputs across paraphrased queries and remain robust to retrieval-induced variability. Because exact reward computation over paraphrase sets is computationally expensive, we also introduce a scalable approximation method that retains effectiveness while enabling efficient, large-scale training. Empirical evaluations across short-form, multi-hop, and long-form QA benchmarks demonstrate that Con-RAG significantly improves both consistency and accuracy over strong baselines, even in the absence of explicit ground-truth supervision. Our work provides practical solutions for evaluating and building reliable RAG systems for safety-critical deployments.

Related papers

• RAGRouter-Bench: A Dataset and Benchmark for Adaptive RAG Routing [37.7721677767453]
  We introduce RAG-Bench, the first dataset and benchmark designed for adaptive RAG routing.<n>RAG-Bench revisits retrieval from a query-corpus compatibility perspective and standardizes five representative RAG paradigms for systematic evaluation.<n> Experiments with DeepSeek-V3 and LLaMA-3.1-8B demonstrate that no single RAG paradigm is universally optimal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T20:38:11Z)
• ArenaRL: Scaling RL for Open-Ended Agents via Tournament-based Relative Ranking [84.07076200941474]
  ArenaRL is a reinforcement learning paradigm that shifts from pointwise scalar scoring to intra-group relative ranking.<n>We construct an intra-group adversarial arena and devise a tournament-based ranking scheme to obtain stable advantage signals.<n>Experiments show that ArenaRL substantially outperforms standard RL baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-10T08:43:07Z)
• RAGalyst: Automated Human-Aligned Agentic Evaluation for Domain-Specific RAG [0.0]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a critical technique for grounding Large Language Models (LLMs) in factual evidence.<n>Existing evaluation frameworks often rely on metrics that fail to capture domain-specific nuances.<n>This paper introduces RAGalyst, an automated, human-aligned agentic framework designed for the rigorous evaluation of domain-specific RAG systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-06T16:22:52Z)
• FAIR-RAG: Faithful Adaptive Iterative Refinement for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [0.0]
  We introduce FAIR-RAG, a novel agentic framework that transforms the standard RAG pipeline into a dynamic, evidence-driven reasoning process.<n>We conduct experiments on challenging multi-hop QA benchmarks, including HotpotQA, 2WikiMultiHopQA, and MusiQue.<n>Our work demonstrates that a structured, evidence-driven refinement process with explicit gap analysis is crucial for unlocking reliable and accurate reasoning in advanced RAG systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-25T15:59:33Z)
• Learning to Route: A Rule-Driven Agent Framework for Hybrid-Source Retrieval-Augmented Generation [55.47971671635531]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance on general Question Answering (QA)<n>Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) addresses this limitation by enriching LLMs with external knowledge.<n>Existing systems primarily rely on unstructured documents, while largely overlooking relational databases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T22:19:44Z)
• SIRAG: Towards Stable and Interpretable RAG with A Process-Supervised Multi-Agent Framework [7.37561751991963]
  We propose a process-supervised multi-agent framework to bridge the gap between retriever and generator.<n>The proposed framework is modular and plug-and-play, requiring no modification to the retriever or generator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-17T09:09:28Z)
• CompassVerifier: A Unified and Robust Verifier for LLMs Evaluation and Outcome Reward [50.97588334916863]
  We develop CompassVerifier, an accurate and robust lightweight verifier model for evaluation and outcome reward.<n>It demonstrates multi-domain competency spanning math, knowledge, and diverse reasoning tasks, with the capability to process various answer types.<n>We introduce VerifierBench benchmark comprising model outputs collected from multiple data sources, augmented through manual analysis of metaerror patterns to enhance CompassVerifier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-05T17:55:24Z)
• GRPO-CARE: Consistency-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Multimodal Reasoning [53.894789613838654]
  We introduce SEED-Bench-R1, a benchmark with complex real-world videos requiring balanced perception and reasoning.<n>Using SEED-Bench-R1, we find that standard GRPO, while improving answer accuracy, often reduces logical coherence between reasoning steps and answers, with only a 57.9% consistency rate.<n>We propose GRPO-CARE, a consistency-aware RL framework optimizing both answer correctness and reasoning coherence without explicit supervision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-19T08:49:13Z)
• RARE: Retrieval-Aware Robustness Evaluation for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems [33.389969814185214]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances recency and factuality in answers.<n>Existing evaluations rarely test how well RAG systems cope with real-world noise, conflicting between internal and external retrieved contexts, or fast-changing facts.<n>We introduce Retrieval-Aware Robustness Evaluation (RARE), a unified framework and large-scale benchmark that jointly stress-test query and document perturbations over dynamic, time-sensitive corpora.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-01T02:42:36Z)
• RAG-Zeval: Towards Robust and Interpretable Evaluation on RAG Responses through End-to-End Rule-Guided Reasoning [64.46921169261852]
  RAG-Zeval is a novel end-to-end framework that formulates faithfulness and correctness evaluation as a rule-guided reasoning task.<n>Our approach trains evaluators with reinforcement learning, facilitating compact models to generate comprehensive and sound assessments.<n>Experiments demonstrate RAG-Zeval's superior performance, achieving the strongest correlation with human judgments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T14:55:33Z)
• AlignRAG: Leveraging Critique Learning for Evidence-Sensitive Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning [61.28113271728859]
  RAG has become a widely adopted paradigm for enabling knowledge-grounded large language models (LLMs)<n>Standard RAG pipelines often fail to ensure that model reasoning remains consistent with the evidence retrieved, leading to factual inconsistencies or unsupported conclusions.<n>In this work, we reinterpret RAG as Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning and identify a central but underexplored problem: textitReasoning Misalignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T04:56:47Z)
• MAIN-RAG: Multi-Agent Filtering Retrieval-Augmented Generation [34.66546005629471]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are essential tools for various natural language processing tasks but often suffer from generating outdated or incorrect information.<n>Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) addresses this issue by incorporating external, real-time information retrieval to ground LLM responses.<n>To tackle this problem, we propose Multi-Agent Filtering Retrieval-Augmented Generation (MAIN-RAG)<n>MAIN-RAG is a training-free RAG framework that leverages multiple LLM agents to collaboratively filter and score retrieved documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-31T08:07:26Z)
• Semantic Tokens in Retrieval Augmented Generation [0.0]
  I propose a novel Comparative RAG system that introduces an evaluator module to bridge the gap between probabilistic RAG systems and deterministically verifiable responses.<n>This framework paves the way for more reliable and scalable question-answering applications in domains requiring high precision and verifiability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-03T16:52:06Z)
• RAGEval: Scenario Specific RAG Evaluation Dataset Generation Framework [66.93260816493553]
  This paper introduces RAGEval, a framework designed to assess RAG systems across diverse scenarios.<n>With a focus on factual accuracy, we propose three novel metrics: Completeness, Hallucination, and Irrelevance.<n> Experimental results show that RAGEval outperforms zero-shot and one-shot methods in terms of clarity, safety, conformity, and richness of generated samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T13:35:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.