Human Oversight and Overload: Two Hidden and Costly Burdens of AI-Assisted Software Engineering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05770v1
• Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2026 06:53:45 GMT
• Title: Human Oversight and Overload: Two Hidden and Costly Burdens of AI-Assisted Software Engineering
• Abstract summary: AI is changing how software engineers work, but it often comes with hidden burdens and costs.<n>In this paper, we characterize two such often-overlooked burdens.<n>The need for human oversight is not optional-engineers must review, validate, and sometimes rework what AI produces.<n>At the same time, the flood of AI suggestions, prompts, and possible solutions can leave developers mentally stretched.
• Score: 0.6700873164609007
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: AI is changing how software engineers work, but it often comes with hidden burdens and costs. In this paper, we characterize two such often-overlooked burdens: (1) the constant need for human oversight and inspection of AI-generated artifacts; and (2) the growing cognitive overload on software engineers from receiving large amounts of suggestions from AI tools. The need for human oversight is not optional-engineers must review, validate, and sometimes rework what AI produces. At the same time, the flood of AI suggestions, prompts, and possible solutions can leave developers mentally stretched. By blending evidence from recent opinions from practitioners, we highlight these often-overlooked challenges and open a conversation about how teams can handle them in day-to-day AI-assisted software engineering.

Related papers

• Towards Actionable Visualization: Ten Years Later, What Generative AI Changes and What It Cannot [2.171848826907517]
  Ten years ago, we surveyed software visualization research under the assumption that the challenge for adoption was matching developers' needs with techniques.<n>We argue that AI might have made that assumption obsolete by driving the cost of producing a visualization on demand toward zero.<n>We confront the risks that follow, from the reliability of AI-generated visualization itself to the temptation of competing with machines on their own terrain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-23T00:40:51Z)
• Agentic AI for Software: thoughts from Software Engineering community [9.966138715949205]
  At the code level, common software tasks include code generation, testing, and program repair.<n>Key to successfully developing agentic AI-based software will be to resolve the core difficulty in software engineering - the deciphering and clarification of developer intent.<n>A successful deployment of agentic technology into software engineering would involve making conceptual progress in such intent inference via agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-24T12:57:21Z)
• A roadmap for AI in robotics [55.87087746398059]
  We are witnessing growing excitement in robotics at the prospect of leveraging the potential of AI to tackle some of the outstanding barriers to the full deployment of robots in our daily lives.<n>This article offers an assessment of what AI for robotics has achieved since the 1990s and proposes a short- and medium-term research roadmap listing challenges and promises.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-26T15:18:28Z)
• How Software Engineers Engage with AI: A Pragmatic Process Model and Decision Framework Grounded in Industry Observations [1.516251872371896]
  GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT have given rise to "vibe coding"<n>This paper presents two complementary contributions.<n>First, a pragmatic process model capturing real-world AI-assisted SE activities, including prompt design, inspection, fallback, and refinement.<n>Second, a 2D decision framework that could help developers reason about trade-offs between effort saved and output quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-23T21:00:21Z)
• Code with Me or for Me? How Increasing AI Automation Transforms Developer Workflows [60.04362496037186]
  We present the first controlled study of developer interactions with coding agents.<n>We evaluate two leading copilot and agentic coding assistants.<n>Our results show agents can assist developers in ways that surpass copilots.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T20:12:54Z)
• Explainability for Embedding AI: Aspirations and Actuality [1.8130068086063336]
  Explainable AI (XAI) may allow developers to understand better the systems they build.<n>Existing XAI systems still fall short of this aspiration.<n>We see an unmet need to provide developers with adequate support mechanisms to cope with this complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-20T14:20:01Z)
• Challenges and Paths Towards AI for Software Engineering [55.95365538122656]
  We discuss progress in AI for software engineering in threefold manner.<n>First, we provide a structured taxonomy of concrete tasks in AI for software engineering.<n>Second, we outline several key bottlenecks that limit current approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-28T17:17:57Z)
• Seamful XAI: Operationalizing Seamful Design in Explainable AI [59.89011292395202]
  Mistakes in AI systems are inevitable, arising from both technical limitations and sociotechnical gaps. We propose that seamful design can foster AI explainability by revealing sociotechnical and infrastructural mismatches. We explore this process with 43 AI practitioners and real end-users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-12T21:54:05Z)
• Cybertrust: From Explainable to Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) [58.981120701284816]
  Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) will incorporate explicit quantifications and visualizations of user confidence in AI recommendations. It will allow examining and testing of AI system predictions to establish a basis for trust in the systems' decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-26T18:53:09Z)
• Artificial Intelligence in Software Testing : Impact, Problems, Challenges and Prospect [0.0]
  The study aims to recognize and explain some of the biggest challenges software testers face while applying AI to testing. The paper also proposes some key contributions of AI in the future to the domain of software testing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-14T10:21:51Z)
• Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective [54.80482955088197]
  We focus on six of the most crucial dimensions in achieving trustworthy AI: (i) Safety & Robustness, (ii) Non-discrimination & Fairness, (iii) Explainability, (iv) Privacy, (v) Accountability & Auditability, and (vi) Environmental Well-Being. For each dimension, we review the recent related technologies according to a taxonomy and summarize their applications in real-world systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-12T14:21:46Z)
• Explainable AI for Software Engineering [12.552048647904591]
  We first highlight the need for explainable AI in software engineering. Then, we summarize three successful case studies on how explainable AI techniques can be used to address the aforementioned challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-03T00:42:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.