Domain Diversity, Motivation, Inclusion, and Feedback in Software Modelling Education

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06275v1
• Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2026 15:16:35 GMT
• Title: Domain Diversity, Motivation, Inclusion, and Feedback in Software Modelling Education
• Abstract summary: This study explores how problem domains and teaching methods influence motivation, engagement, inclusiveness, and feedback in modelling education.<n>Students show greatest motivation for socially relevant domains and prefer choice in selection, while educators overestimate interest in study-related domains.
• Score: 12.471868246618781
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Student engagement is critical for effective learning in software modelling, yet fostering motivation and inclusivity remains a challenge. While existing research has focused on modelling tools, notations, and assessment, little attention has been given to how the choice of problem domains and the diversity, relatability, and cultural perspectives they bring shape students' learning experiences. This study explores how problem domains and teaching methods influence motivation, engagement, inclusiveness, and feedback in modelling education. To investigate these dimensions, we conducted parallel surveys with 90 students and 22 educators. Our findings reveal disconnects between educator assumptions and student preferences: Students show greatest motivation for socially relevant domains and prefer choice in selection, while educators overestimate interest in study-related domains. The study identifies how minor design choices can exclude students. Students perceive feedback as meaningful when visibly acted upon. These findings suggest inclusive domain selection is central to student motivation; thus, we recommend student-centred domain selection.

Related papers

• Who Is Lagging Behind: Profiling Student Behaviors with Graph-Level Encoding in Curriculum-Based Online Learning Systems [0.4775214751904462]
  Student profiling is crucial for tracking progress, identifying struggling students, and alleviating disparities among students.<n>We introduce CTGraph, a graph-level repre- sentation learning approach to profile learner behaviors and performance in a self-supervised manner.<n>Our approach opens more opportunities to empower educators with rich insights into student learning journeys.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-26T11:03:00Z)
• Diversity in Software Engineering Education: Exploring Motivations, Influences, and Role Models Among Undergraduate Students [0.0]
  Software engineering (SE) faces significant diversity challenges in both academia and industry.<n>Despite significant research on the exclusion experienced by students from underrepresented groups in SE education, there is limited understanding of the specific motivations, influences, and role models that drive underrepresented students to pursue and persist in the field.<n>This study explores the motivations and influences shaping the career aspirations of students from underrepresented groups in SE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-16T22:14:10Z)
• Exploring Engagement and Perceived Learning Outcomes in an Immersive Flipped Learning Context [0.195804735329484]
  The aim of this study was to explore the benefits and challenges of the immersive flipped learning approach in relation to students' online engagement and perceived learning outcomes. The study revealed high levels of student engagement and perceived learning outcomes, although it also identified areas needing improvement. The findings of this study can serve as a valuable resource for educators seeking to design engaging and effective remote learning experiences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-19T11:38:48Z)
• Toward In-Context Teaching: Adapting Examples to Students' Misconceptions [54.82965010592045]
  We introduce a suite of models and evaluation methods we call AdapT. AToM is a new probabilistic model for adaptive teaching that jointly infers students' past beliefs and optimize for the correctness of future beliefs. Our results highlight both the difficulty of the adaptive teaching task and the potential of learned adaptive models for solving it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T17:05:27Z)
• Enhancing Students' Learning Process Through Self-Generated Tests [0.0]
  This paper describes an educational experiment aimed at the promotion of students' autonomous learning. The main idea is to make the student feel part of the evaluation process by including students' questions in the evaluation exams. Questions uploaded by students are visible to every enrolled student as well as to each involved teacher.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T09:49:33Z)
• Evaluating and Optimizing Educational Content with Large Language Model Judgments [52.33701672559594]
  We use Language Models (LMs) as educational experts to assess the impact of various instructions on learning outcomes. We introduce an instruction optimization approach in which one LM generates instructional materials using the judgments of another LM as a reward function. Human teachers' evaluations of these LM-generated worksheets show a significant alignment between the LM judgments and human teacher preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T09:09:15Z)
• A literature survey on student feedback assessment tools and their usage in sentiment analysis [0.0]
  We evaluate the effectiveness of various in-class feedback assessment methods such as Kahoot!, Mentimeter, Padlet, and polling. We propose a sentiment analysis model for extracting the explicit suggestions from the students' qualitative feedback comments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-09T06:56:30Z)
• The Challenges of Assessing and Evaluating the Students at Distance [77.34726150561087]
  The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a strong effect on higher education institutions with the closure of classroom teaching activities. This short essay aims to explore the challenges posed to Portuguese higher education institutions and to analyze the challenges posed to evaluation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-30T13:13:45Z)
• Personalized Education in the AI Era: What to Expect Next? [76.37000521334585]
  The objective of personalized learning is to design an effective knowledge acquisition track that matches the learner's strengths and bypasses her weaknesses to meet her desired goal. In recent years, the boost of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) has unfolded novel perspectives to enhance personalized education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-19T12:23:32Z)
• Revealing the Hidden Patterns: A Comparative Study on Profiling Subpopulations of MOOC Students [61.58283466715385]
  Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) exhibit a remarkable heterogeneity of students. The advent of complex "big data" from MOOC platforms is a challenging yet rewarding opportunity to deeply understand how students are engaged in MOOCs. We report on clustering analysis of student activities and comparative analysis on both behavioral patterns and demographical patterns between student subpopulations in the MOOC.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-12T10:38:50Z)
• Neural Multi-Task Learning for Teacher Question Detection in Online Classrooms [50.19997675066203]
  We build an end-to-end neural framework that automatically detects questions from teachers' audio recordings. By incorporating multi-task learning techniques, we are able to strengthen the understanding of semantic relations among different types of questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-16T02:17:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.