Risk Assessment of Autonomous Driving: Integrating Technical Failures, Ethical Dilemmas, and Policy Frameworks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06396v1
• Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2026 17:02:53 GMT
• Title: Risk Assessment of Autonomous Driving: Integrating Technical Failures, Ethical Dilemmas, and Policy Frameworks
• Abstract summary: The main types of technical failure modes are perception and classification errors.<n>The problems of technology, ethics and regulation are closely related and need to be solved together.<n>This paper recommends a more adaptive and cooperative governance approach that combines engineering standards, ethical discussion, and institutional supervision.
• Score: 11.597325192675031
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Autonomous driving technology has the potential to reduce the large number of road traffic accidents caused by human error each year, but it also brings new types of risks that need to be evaluated from the aspects of technology, ethics and regulations. Based on public crash data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), disengagement reports from the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), the MIT Moral Machines dataset, and a comparative regulatory analysis of five jurisdictions, we have found that the main types of technical failure modes are perception and classification errors. These account for a relatively large proportion of the reported accidents, and it can be concluded that there are different ethical frameworks for autonomous vehicle decision-making, and inconsistent regulations in different areas increase the uncertainty of widespread application. Generally speaking, the problems of technology, ethics and regulation are closely related and need to be solved together. Therefore, this paper recommends a more adaptive and cooperative governance approach that combines engineering standards, ethical discussion, and institutional supervision.

Related papers

• World Engine: Towards the Era of Post-Training for Autonomous Driving [63.61277741443647]
  We introduce World Engine, a generative framework that reconstructs high-fidelity interactive environments from real-world logs.<n>World Engine substantially reduces failures in rare safety-critical scenarios and yields significantly larger gains than scaling pre-training data alone.<n>When deployed on a production-scale autonomous driving system, the resulting policy reduces simulated collisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-18T06:28:33Z)
• From Review to Design: Ethical Multimodal Driver Monitoring Systems for Risk Mitigation, Incident Response, and Accountability in Automated Vehicles [4.497527935481453]
  We propose a modular ethical design framework tailored specifically to Driver Monitoring Systems.<n>The framework translates high-level principles into actionable design and deployment guidance.<n>Together, these contributions aim to inform the development of transparent, trustworthy, and human-centered driver monitoring systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T15:40:17Z)
• Ethics-Aware Safe Reinforcement Learning for Rare-Event Risk Control in Interactive Urban Driving [1.2891210250935148]
  We present a hierarchical Safe Reinforcement Learning framework that augments standard driving objectives with ethics-aware cost signals.<n>A Safe RL agent is trained using a composite ethical risk cost, combining collision probability and harm severity, to generate high-level motion targets.<n>A dynamic, risk-sensitive Prioritized Experience mechanism amplifies learning from rare but critical, high-risk events.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-19T14:24:02Z)
• Generative AI for Autonomous Driving: Frontiers and Opportunities [145.6465312554513]
  This survey delivers a comprehensive synthesis of the emerging role of GenAI across the autonomous driving stack.<n>We begin by distilling the principles and trade-offs of modern generative modeling, encompassing VAEs, GANs, Diffusion Models, and Large Language Models.<n>We categorize practical applications, such as synthetic data generalization, end-to-end driving strategies, high-fidelity digital twin systems, smart transportation networks, and cross-domain transfer to embodied AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-13T17:59:20Z)
• Traffic and Safety Rule Compliance of Humans in Diverse Driving Situations [48.924085579865334]
  Analyzing human data is crucial for developing autonomous systems that replicate safe driving practices. This paper presents a comparative evaluation of human compliance with traffic and safety rules across multiple trajectory prediction datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T09:21:00Z)
• Work-in-Progress: Crash Course: Can (Under Attack) Autonomous Driving Beat Human Drivers? [60.51287814584477]
  This paper evaluates the inherent risks in autonomous driving by examining the current landscape of AVs. We develop specific claims highlighting the delicate balance between the advantages of AVs and potential security challenges in real-world scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-14T09:42:21Z)
• Why Autonomous Vehicles Are Not Ready Yet: A Multi-Disciplinary Review of Problems, Attempted Solutions, and Future Directions [43.389650174195914]
  The present review adopts an integrative and multidisciplinary approach to investigate the major challenges faced by the automative sector.<n>The review examines the limitations and risks associated with current technologies and the most promising solutions devised by the researchers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T16:41:18Z)
• A Counterfactual Safety Margin Perspective on the Scoring of Autonomous Vehicles' Riskiness [52.27309191283943]
  This paper presents a data-driven framework for assessing the risk of different AVs' behaviors. We propose the notion of counterfactual safety margin, which represents the minimum deviation from nominal behavior that could cause a collision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-02T09:48:08Z)
• RCP-RF: A Comprehensive Road-car-pedestrian Risk Management Framework based on Driving Risk Potential Field [1.625213292350038]
  We propose a comprehensive driving risk management framework named RCP-RF based on potential field theory under Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAV) environment. Different from existing algorithms, the motion tendency between ego and obstacle cars and the pedestrian factor are legitimately considered in the proposed framework. Empirical studies validate the superiority of our proposed framework against state-of-the-art methods on real-world dataset NGSIM and real AV platform.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-04T01:54:37Z)
• Multi-criteria Decision-making of Intelligent Vehicles under Fault Condition Enhancing Public-private Partnership [10.269997499911668]
  We look into the maintenance planning of an operating vehicle under fault condition and formulate it as a multi-criteria decision-making problem. We consider two criteria, namely the risk of public time loss and the risk of mission delay, representing the concerns of the public sector and the private sector. With the proposed method, alternate decisions can be derived to reduce the risks of public time loss significantly with a low increase in the risk of mission delay.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-27T15:57:18Z)
• Risk Measurement, Risk Entropy, and Autonomous Driving Risk Modeling [0.0]
  This article examines the emerging technical difficulties, new ideas, and methods of risk modeling under autonomous driving scenarios. It provides technical feasibility for realizing risk assessment and car insurance pricing under a computer simulation environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-15T11:00:18Z)
• Emergent Road Rules In Multi-Agent Driving Environments [84.82583370858391]
  We analyze what ingredients in driving environments cause the emergence of road rules. We find that two crucial factors are noisy perception and agents' spatial density. Our results add empirical support for the social road rules that countries worldwide have agreed on for safe, efficient driving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-21T09:43:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.