Architecturally Significant MLOps Guidelines for ML Model Integration and Deployment: a Gray Literature Review
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06535v1
- Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2026 21:09:50 GMT
- Title: Architecturally Significant MLOps Guidelines for ML Model Integration and Deployment: a Gray Literature Review
- Abstract summary: We conduct a gray literature review of 103 web sources to analyze state-of-practice knowledge on MLOps model integration and deployment.<n>We apply thematic analysis to synthesize these practices into recommended guidelines.<n>Our results serve as an overview of state-of-practice MLOps guidelines to support researchers and practitioners with the integration and deployment of ML models in their MLOps systems.
- Score: 4.513916758263758
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Context. Despite the growing adoption of Machine Learning Operations (MLOps), teams often approach MLOps projects in an ad hoc manner due to the lack of consolidated architectural guidance. The community would benefit from a reference that synthesizes knowledge to inform the architectural design of MLOps systems, especially regarding the integration and deployment of ML models. Objective. In response, our goal is to provide a comprehensive overview of architecturally significant guidelines for the integration and deployment of ML models in MLOps systems. Method. We conduct a gray literature review of 103 web sources to analyze state-of-practice knowledge on MLOps model integration and deployment. We then apply thematic analysis to synthesize these practices into recommended guidelines. Results. We contribute a collection of 25 architecturally significant MLOps guidelines for model integration and deployment, organized into five categories, and describe their impact on the overall system architecture. Conclusion. Our results serve as an overview of state-of-practice MLOps guidelines to support researchers and practitioners with the integration and deployment of ML models in their MLOps systems.
Related papers
- World Action Models: The Next Frontier in Embodied AI [123.5787299299832]
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have achieved strong semantic generalization for embodied policy learning.<n>They learn reactive observation-to-action mappings without explicitly modeling how the physical world evolves under intervention.<n>A growing body of work addresses this limitation by integrating world models, predictive models of environment dynamics, into the action generation pipeline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-12T13:10:52Z) - Embedding the MLOps Lifecycle into OT Reference Models [0.40831821256838124]
Machine Learning Operations (MLOps) practices are increas- ingly adopted in industrial settings, yet their integration with Opera- tional Technology (OT) systems presents significant challenges.<n>This pa- per analyzes the fundamental obstacles in combining MLOps with OT en- vironments and proposes a systematic approach to embed MLOps prac- tices into established OT reference models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-23T14:14:21Z) - Fundamentals of Building Autonomous LLM Agents [64.39018305018904]
This paper reviews the architecture and implementation methods of agents powered by large language models (LLMs)<n>The research aims to explore patterns to develop "agentic" LLMs that can automate complex tasks and bridge the performance gap with human capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-10T10:32:39Z) - A Metrics-Oriented Architectural Model to Characterize Complexity on Machine Learning-Enabled Systems [0.0]
This research aims to introduce a metrics-based architectural model to characterize the complexity of MLES.<n>The goal is to support architectural decisions, providing a guideline for the inception and growth of these systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-09T19:02:19Z) - From Standalone LLMs to Integrated Intelligence: A Survey of Compound Al Systems [6.284317913684068]
Compound Al Systems (CAIS) is an emerging paradigm that integrates large language models (LLMs) with external components, such as retrievers, agents, tools, and orchestrators.<n>Despite growing adoption in both academia and industry, the CAIS landscape remains fragmented, lacking a unified framework for analysis, taxonomy, and evaluation.<n>This survey aims to provide researchers and practitioners with a comprehensive foundation for understanding, developing, and advancing the next generation of system-level artificial intelligence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-05T02:34:43Z) - Abstractive Visual Understanding of Multi-modal Structured Knowledge: A New Perspective for MLLM Evaluation [48.462734327375536]
Multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) incorporate heterogeneous modalities into LLMs, enabling a comprehensive understanding of diverse scenarios and objects.<n>Despite the proliferation of evaluation benchmarks and leaderboards for MLLMs, they predominantly overlook the critical capacity of MLLMs to comprehend world knowledge with structured abstractions that appear in visual form.<n>We propose M3STR, an innovative benchmark grounded in the Multi-Modal Map for STRuctured understanding.<n>Our findings reveal persistent deficiencies in processing abstractive visual information with structured knowledge, thereby charting a pivotal trajectory for advancing MLLMs' holistic reasoning capacities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-02T04:00:35Z) - Large Language Model Agent: A Survey on Methodology, Applications and Challenges [88.3032929492409]
Large Language Model (LLM) agents, with goal-driven behaviors and dynamic adaptation capabilities, potentially represent a critical pathway toward artificial general intelligence.<n>This survey systematically deconstructs LLM agent systems through a methodology-centered taxonomy.<n>Our work provides a unified architectural perspective, examining how agents are constructed, how they collaborate, and how they evolve over time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-27T12:50:17Z) - A Survey of Model Architectures in Information Retrieval [59.61734783818073]
The period from 2019 to the present has represented one of the biggest paradigm shifts in information retrieval (IR) and natural language processing (NLP)<n>We trace the development from traditional term-based methods to modern neural approaches, particularly highlighting the impact of transformer-based models and subsequent large language models (LLMs)<n>We conclude with a forward-looking discussion of emerging challenges and future directions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-20T18:42:58Z) - An Analysis of MLOps Architectures: A Systematic Mapping Study [12.399094410444743]
This study provides an overview of the state of the art in MLOps from an architectural perspective.
Researchers and practitioners can use our findings to inform the architecture design of their MLOps systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-28T11:38:50Z) - Synergistic Integration of Large Language Models and Cognitive
Architectures for Robust AI: An Exploratory Analysis [12.9222727028798]
This paper explores the integration of two AI subdisciplines employed in the development of artificial agents that exhibit intelligent behavior: Large Language Models (LLMs) and Cognitive Architectures (CAs)
We present three integration approaches, each grounded in theoretical models and supported by preliminary empirical evidence.
These approaches aim to harness the strengths of both LLMs and CAs, while mitigating their weaknesses, thereby advancing the development of more robust AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-18T21:42:47Z) - Enhancing Architecture Frameworks by Including Modern Stakeholders and their Views/Viewpoints [48.87872564630711]
The stakeholders with data science and Machine Learning related concerns, such as data scientists and data engineers, are yet to be included in existing architecture frameworks.<n>We surveyed 61 subject matter experts from over 25 organizations in 10 countries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-09T21:54:34Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.