Learning Fair Demand Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06830v1
• Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2026 02:12:07 GMT
• Title: Learning Fair Demand Models
• Abstract summary: Data-driven pricing is increasingly prevalent in sectors such as airlines, lending, insurance, and retail.<n>We study a model where a seller has a two-stage decision pipeline comprising linear demand model estimation followed by price optimization.<n>We show that equalizing training loss across consumer groups leads to multiple solutions, which in turn can result in undesirable outcomes.
• Score: 2.317318456608172
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Data-driven pricing is increasingly prevalent in sectors such as airlines, lending, insurance, and retail. By learning demand models from customer features and setting prices accordingly, these systems may generate discriminatory outcomes that raise fairness concerns. This leads to fundamental questions - how and where should systems incorporate fairness considerations in the pricing pipeline, and how does it ultimately affect societal outcomes? To answer these, we study a stylized model where a seller has a two-stage decision pipeline comprising linear demand model estimation followed by price optimization. The seller considers fairness notions in training loss, price, and demand, under both parity-wise and Rawlsian perspectives. We show that equalizing training loss across consumer groups leads to multiple solutions, which in turn can result in undesirable outcomes despite being a standard approach in fair machine learning. Focusing instead on fairness applied directly to prices or demand, we compare two strategies that enforce fairness in either the demand estimation stage or the price optimization stage. For parity-wise fairness, we characterize when each strategy yields higher social welfare under small fairness levels. We show that when market sizes and prices in the dataset are similar, imposing price fairness in the estimation stage is more beneficial to consumers, whereas imposing demand fairness in the optimization stage yields better consumer outcomes. For Rawlsian fairness, the two strategies coincide exactly. Lastly, we extend our model to alternate demand functions and conduct a case study using real-world vaccine pricing data.

Related papers

• Equity by Design: Fairness-Driven Recommendation in Heterogeneous Two-Sided Markets [44.675845572303324]
  We introduce Conditional Value-at-Risk as a consumer-side objective that compresses group-level utility disparities.<n>Our experiments reveal that the "free fairness" regime, where producer constraints impose no consumer cost, disappears in multi item settings.<n>Strikingly, moderate fairness constraints can improve business metrics by diversifying exposure away from saturated producers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-11T10:59:32Z)
• Towards Harmless Rawlsian Fairness Regardless of Demographic Prior [57.30787578956235]
  We explore the potential for achieving fairness without compromising its utility when no prior demographics are provided to the training set. We propose a simple but effective method named VFair to minimize the variance of training losses inside the optimal set of empirical losses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T12:40:34Z)
• FairDgcl: Fairness-aware Recommendation with Dynamic Graph Contrastive Learning [48.38344934125999]
  We study how to implement high-quality data augmentation to improve recommendation fairness. Specifically, we propose FairDgcl, a dynamic graph adversarial contrastive learning framework. We show that FairDgcl can simultaneously generate enhanced representations that possess both fairness and accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T04:43:03Z)
• Fairness Incentives in Response to Unfair Dynamic Pricing [7.991187769447732]
  We design a basic simulated economy, wherein we generate corporate taxation schedules geared to incentivizing firms towards adopting fair pricing behaviours. To cover a range of possible policy scenarios, we formulate our social planner's learning problem as a multi-armed bandit, a contextual bandit and as a full reinforcement learning (RL) problem. We find that social welfare improves on that of the fairness-agnostic baseline, and approaches that of the analytically optimal fairness-aware baseline for the multi-armed and contextual bandit settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T23:12:58Z)
• A Bargaining-based Approach for Feature Trading in Vertical Federated Learning [54.51890573369637]
  We propose a bargaining-based feature trading approach in Vertical Federated Learning (VFL) to encourage economically efficient transactions. Our model incorporates performance gain-based pricing, taking into account the revenue-based optimization objectives of both parties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-23T10:21:07Z)
• A Causal Perspective on Loan Pricing: Investigating the Impacts of Selection Bias on Identifying Bid-Response Functions [1.0937531920233807]
  We take a step towards understanding the effects of selection bias by posing pricing as a problem of causal inference. In our experiments, we simulate varying levels of selection bias on a semi-synthetic dataset on mortgage loan applications in Belgium. We implement state-of-the-art methods from causal machine learning and show their capability to overcome selection bias in pricing data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-07T14:14:30Z)
• Improved Bayes Risk Can Yield Reduced Social Welfare Under Competition [99.7047087527422]
  In this work, we demonstrate that competition can fundamentally alter the behavior of machine learning scaling trends. We find many settings where improving data representation quality decreases the overall predictive accuracy across users. At a conceptual level, our work suggests that favorable scaling trends for individual model-providers need not translate to downstream improvements in social welfare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-26T13:06:34Z)
• DualFair: Fair Representation Learning at Both Group and Individual Levels via Contrastive Self-supervision [73.80009454050858]
  This work presents a self-supervised model, called DualFair, that can debias sensitive attributes like gender and race from learned representations. Our model jointly optimize for two fairness criteria - group fairness and counterfactual fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-15T07:13:54Z)
• FairAdaBN: Mitigating unfairness with adaptive batch normalization and its application to dermatological disease classification [14.589159162086926]
  We propose FairAdaBN, which makes batch normalization adaptive to sensitive attribute. We propose a new metric, named Fairness-Accuracy Trade-off Efficiency (FATE), to compute normalized fairness improvement over accuracy drop. Experiments on two dermatological datasets show that our proposed method outperforms other methods on fairness criteria and FATE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-15T02:22:07Z)
• Convex Loss Functions for Contextual Pricing with Observational Posted-Price Data [2.538209532048867]
  We study an off-policy contextual pricing problem where the seller has access to samples of prices which customers were previously offered. This is in contrast to the well-studied setting in which samples of the customer's valuation (willingness to pay) are observed. In our setting, the observed data is influenced by the historic pricing policy, and we do not know how customers would have responded to alternative prices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-16T22:35:39Z)
• Fairness, Welfare, and Equity in Personalized Pricing [88.9134799076718]
  We study the interplay of fairness, welfare, and equity considerations in personalized pricing based on customer features. We show the potential benefits of personalized pricing in two settings: pricing subsidies for an elective vaccine, and the effects of personalized interest rates on downstream outcomes in microcredit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-21T01:01:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.