Struct-Searcher: Agentic Structural Thinking Advances Multimodal Deep Information Seeking

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07689v1
• Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2026 06:25:11 GMT
• Title: Struct-Searcher: Agentic Structural Thinking Advances Multimodal Deep Information Seeking
• Abstract summary: Struct-Searcher is a structural agentic workflow grounded in belief theory.<n>It explicitly maintains an evolving multimodal structural graph throughout the reasoning process.
• Score: 57.25141826641528
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Deep research agents have attracted increasing attention for their ability to collect large-scale online information to acquire target knowledge, with recent efforts shifting from purely text-based information seeking to multimodal settings. However, existing agentic workflows are largely aligned with evidence accumulation models, which linearly aggregate evidence and lack principled mechanisms for handling contradictory information across heterogeneous modalities. Towards this end, we propose Struct-Searcher, a structural agentic workflow grounded in belief revision theory that explicitly maintains an evolving multimodal structural graph throughout the reasoning process, enabling effective conflict-aware multimodal deep information seeking. Extensive experiments across multiple benchmark datasets and backbone models demonstrate that Struct-Searcher is (1) plug-and-play and model-agnostic, yielding an average relative accuracy improvement of 17.2% on BrowseComp-VL across five different backbones. (2) top-performing, consistently outperforming state-of-the-art vision-language models (VLMs) and deep research agents, with relative accuracy improvements of 3.7% on MM-BrowseComp, 1.5% on HLE-VL, and 0.7% on BrowseComp-VL over the second-best competing approach.

Related papers

• MM-Doc-R1: Training Agents for Long Document Visual Question Answering through Multi-turn Reinforcement Learning [74.07254720088926]
  We introduce MM-Doc-R1, a novel framework that employs an agentic, vision-aware workflow to address long document visual question answering.<n>We propose Similarity-based Policy Optimization (SPO), addressing baseline estimation bias in existing multi-turn reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms like GRPO.<n>Our experiments on the MMLongbench-Doc benchmark show that MM-Doc-R1 outperforms previous baselines by 10.4%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-15T07:39:08Z)
• An Empirical Study of Multi-Agent Collaboration for Automated Research [41.906658558789545]
  We present a study investigating the comparative efficacy of distinct multi-agent structures for automated machine learning optimization.<n>We benchmark a single-agent baseline against two multi-agent paradigms: a subagent architecture and an agent team architecture.<n>Our findings reveal a fundamental trade-off between operational stability and theoretical deliberation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-31T11:57:00Z)
• KARL: Knowledge Agents via Reinforcement Learning [63.627906947205624]
  We present a system for training enterprise search agents via reinforcement learning.<n> KARLBench is a multi-capability evaluation suite spanning six distinct search regimes.<n>We show that models trained across heterogeneous search behaviors generalize substantially better than those optimized for any single benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T14:30:25Z)
• MC-Search: Evaluating and Enhancing Multimodal Agentic Search with Structured Long Reasoning Chains [79.14584837105808]
  We present MC-Search, the first benchmark for agentic MM-RAG with long, step-wise annotated reasoning chains spanning five representative reasoning structures.<n>Beyond answer accuracy, MC-Search introduces new process-level metrics for reasoning quality, stepwise retrieval and planning accuracy.<n>By developing a unified agentic MM-RAG pipeline, we benchmark six leading MLLMs and reveal systematic issues such as over- and under-retrieval and modality-misaligned planning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-01T02:25:57Z)
• Search-R2: Enhancing Search-Integrated Reasoning via Actor-Refiner Collaboration [49.9937230730202]
  We propose Search-R2, a novel Actor-Refiner collaboration framework that enhances reasoning through targeted intervention.<n>Our approach decomposes the generation process into an Actor, which produces initial reasoning trajectories.<n>We show that Search-R2 consistently outperforms strong RAG and RL-based baselines across model scales.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T15:32:09Z)
• WideSeek: Advancing Wide Research via Multi-Agent Scaling [29.02742625120584]
  Wide Research is a paradigm essential for synthesizing and synthesizing comprehensive information under complex constraints in parallel.<n>We take a deep dive into Wide Research from two perspectives: Data Pipeline and Agent Optimization.<n>First, we produce WideSeekBench, a benchmark constructed via a rigorous multi-phase data pipeline to ensure diversity across the target information volume.<n>Second, we introduce WideSeek, a dynamic hierarchical multi-agent architecture that can autonomously fork parallel sub-agents based on task requirements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T18:32:48Z)
• Localized Kernel Projection Outlyingness: A Two-Stage Approach for Multi-Modal Outlier Detection [0.0]
  Two-Stage LKPLO is a novel multi-stage outlier detection framework.<n>It overcomes the coexisting limitations of conventional projection-based methods.<n>It achieves state-of-the-art performance on challenging datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-28T03:53:46Z)
• Comparative Analysis of AI Agent Architectures for Entity Relationship Classification [1.6887793771613606]
  In this study, we conduct a comparative analysis of three distinct AI agent architectures to perform relation classification.<n>The agentic architectures explored include (1) reflective self-evaluation, (2) hierarchical task decomposition, and (3) a novel multi-agent dynamic example generation mechanism.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that multi-agent coordination consistently outperforms standard few-shot prompting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T04:19:47Z)
• Robustness Analysis on Foundational Segmentation Models [28.01242494123917]
  In this work, we perform a robustness analysis of Visual Foundation Models (VFMs) for segmentation tasks. We benchmark seven state-of-the-art segmentation architectures using 2 different datasets. Our findings reveal several key insights: VFMs exhibit vulnerabilities to compression-induced corruptions, despite not outpacing all of unimodal models in robustness, multimodal models show competitive resilience in zero-shot scenarios, and VFMs demonstrate enhanced robustness for certain object categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T16:59:42Z)
• SAIS: Supervising and Augmenting Intermediate Steps for Document-Level Relation Extraction [51.27558374091491]
  We propose to explicitly teach the model to capture relevant contexts and entity types by supervising and augmenting intermediate steps (SAIS) for relation extraction. Based on a broad spectrum of carefully designed tasks, our proposed SAIS method not only extracts relations of better quality due to more effective supervision, but also retrieves the corresponding supporting evidence more accurately.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-24T17:37:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.