MAAM: Anchor-Preserving Compression and Contextual Calibration for Chinese Discriminatory Language Detection
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.09114v1
- Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2026 07:07:16 GMT
- Title: MAAM: Anchor-Preserving Compression and Contextual Calibration for Chinese Discriminatory Language Detection
- Abstract summary: We propose MAAM (Myopia--Astigmatism Anchor Mechanism), a lightweight, model-agnostic framework inspired by functional visual blur.<n>We also introduce ChLGBT, the first Chinese LGBT-focused discriminatory-language dataset.<n>Across strong encoder baselines, MAAM improves all three prediction dimensions, with consistent gains in accuracy, F1, Brier score, and expected calibration error.
- Score: 4.939857202189033
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Chinese discriminatory-language detection is challenging because harmful intent is often implicit and context-dependent. We propose MAAM (Myopia--Astigmatism Anchor Mechanism), a lightweight, model-agnostic framework inspired by functional visual blur: rather than preserving every token equally, MAAM retains discrimination-relevant semantic anchors and calibrates them with C--I--S contextual priors (Contextual Tone, Group Identity, and Stance Polarity). We also introduce ChLGBT, to our knowledge the first Chinese LGBT-focused discriminatory-language dataset, with 8,120 manually annotated samples and three ordinal labels: explicit bias, implicit bias, and emotional intensity. Across strong encoder baselines, MAAM improves all three prediction dimensions, with consistent gains in accuracy, F1, Brier score, and expected calibration error. Compared with frontier LLM baselines under zero-shot and few-shot prompting protocols, MAAM remains competitive while offering stronger compactness and stability. These results suggest that interpretable anchor preservation and contextual calibration provide a practical alternative to heavier model scaling for Chinese discriminatory-language assessment.
Related papers
- VARM-Bench: Benchmarking Verifiable Structured Reasoning in Chinese Abusive Speech Moderation [12.885908330308046]
VARM-Bench is a benchmark for deterministically verifying the stated basis of a moderation decision.<n>Our protocol evaluates field correctness, target alignment, output validity, complete-record agreement, and hidden record errors.<n>Results show that strong label-level performance can conceal substantial errors in complete moderation records.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-16T07:52:31Z) - Inference-Time Steering for Cross-Lingual Factual Consistency in LLMs [51.56484100374058]
Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable multilingual fluency, but their internal knowledge representations remain disproportionately biased toward high-resource languages.<n>We investigate whether these biases can be mitigated at inference time, forcing an English-prompted model to answer as if it were queried in target languages.<n>Experiments on Gemma 3 12B Instruct reveal persona prompting to be the strongest overall intervention, balancing efficacy, safety, and out-of-domain generalization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-21T16:15:05Z) - The Silent Vote: Improving Zero-Shot LLM Reliability by Aggregating Semantic Neighborhoods [0.0]
We propose an inference-time layer that recovers lost information by aggregating the scores of the semantic neighborhood surrounding each target label.<n>Our results demonstrate consistent improvements across all evaluation metrics: Expected Error (ECE) and Brier Score, while simultaneously enhancing discriminative performance in terms of AUROC and Macro-F1.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-10T20:22:10Z) - Mitigating Cross-Lingual Cultural Inconsistencies in LLMs via Consensus-Driven Preference Optimisation [58.01855677487771]
We show that multilingual large language models (MLLMs) frequently exhibit inconsistent behaviour when the prompt's language changes.<n>We propose Cross-lingual Cultural Consistent Preference optimisation (C-3PO), a consensus-driven alignment framework.<n>C-3PO achieves up to a 0.10-point absolute increase in $_S$ over unaligned models, outperforming strong prompting and representation steering baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-02T14:04:06Z) - Translation or Recitation? Calibrating Evaluation Scores for Machine Translation of Extremely Low-Resource Languages [39.985923582735936]
We introduce the FRED Difficulty Metrics, which include the Fertility Ratio (F), Retrieval Proxy (R), Pre-training Exposure (E) and Corpus Diversity (D)<n>These metrics reveal that a significant portion of result variability is explained by train-test overlap and pre-training exposure rather than model capability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-26T09:20:17Z) - CLM-Bench: Benchmarking and Analyzing Cross-lingual Misalignment of LLMs in Knowledge Editing [5.137059606366328]
We propose CLM-Bench, a culture-aware benchmark constructed using a native Chinese-first methodology.<n>We conduct extensive experiments on representative LLMs and reveal a significant Cross-lingual Misalignment.<n>Our findings challenge the effectiveness of current methods in cross-lingual transfer and underscore the importance of culturally native benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-24T09:55:34Z) - Can Large Language Models Express Uncertainty Like Human? [71.27418419522884]
We release the first diverse, large-scale dataset of hedging expressions with human-annotated confidence scores.<n>We conduct the first systematic study of linguistic confidence across modern large language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-29T02:34:30Z) - Breaking Language Barriers or Reinforcing Bias? A Study of Gender and Racial Disparities in Multilingual Contrastive Vision Language Models [28.944990804599893]
We perform the first systematic audit of four public multilingual CLIP variants: M-CLIP, NLLB-CLIP, CAPIVARA-CLIP, and the debiased SigLIP-2.<n>We quantify race and gender bias and measure stereotype amplification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-20T10:14:00Z) - Uncertainty in Language Models: Assessment through Rank-Calibration [65.10149293133846]
Language Models (LMs) have shown promising performance in natural language generation.
It is crucial to correctly quantify their uncertainty in responding to given inputs.
We develop a novel and practical framework, termed $Rank$-$Calibration$, to assess uncertainty and confidence measures for LMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-04T02:31:05Z) - Machine Translation Meta Evaluation through Translation Accuracy
Challenge Sets [92.38654521870444]
We introduce ACES, a contrastive challenge set spanning 146 language pairs.
This dataset aims to discover whether metrics can identify 68 translation accuracy errors.
We conduct a large-scale study by benchmarking ACES on 50 metrics submitted to the WMT 2022 and 2023 metrics shared tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-29T17:17:42Z) - A Multi-level Supervised Contrastive Learning Framework for Low-Resource
Natural Language Inference [54.678516076366506]
Natural Language Inference (NLI) is a growingly essential task in natural language understanding.
Here we propose a multi-level supervised contrastive learning framework named MultiSCL for low-resource natural language inference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-31T05:54:18Z) - Understanding and Mitigating the Uncertainty in Zero-Shot Translation [92.25357943169601]
We aim to understand and alleviate the off-target issues from the perspective of uncertainty in zero-shot translation.
We propose two lightweight and complementary approaches to denoise the training data for model training.
Our approaches significantly improve the performance of zero-shot translation over strong MNMT baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-20T10:29:46Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.