One Model, Multiple Goals: Adaptive Multi-Objective Learning for E-commerce Dialogue Systems
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.09293v1
- Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2026 10:01:07 GMT
- Title: One Model, Multiple Goals: Adaptive Multi-Objective Learning for E-commerce Dialogue Systems
- Abstract summary: We propose MORE, an adaptive Multi-Objective REinforcement learning framework.<n> MORE jointly optimize reasoning accuracy and linguistic naturalness.<n>We evaluate MORE on two real-world dialogue systems at ByteDance and the MultiWOZ 2.2 benchmark.
- Score: 33.515535808117775
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Dialogue systems in e-commerce scenarios often need to satisfy multiple objectives: accurately reasoning over user profiles (e.g., eligibility, credit limit) to ensure correct decision-making and user state interpretation, while also generating natural and faithful responses. These goals are complementary but not identical. In this work, we propose MORE, an adaptive Multi-Objective REinforcement learning framework that jointly optimizes reasoning accuracy and linguistic naturalness. Our preliminary experiments show that directly mixing rewards with diverging optimization dynamics can cause oscillations and unstable learning. Thus, instead of optimizing a single mixed reward, we treat reasoning functions as constraints that guide policy optimization. At inference time, the system directly generates responses without explicit reasoning steps, while still benefiting from reasoning-enhanced scaffold and avoiding additional inference overhead. To better balance linguistic objectives during response generation, we introduce an adaptive multi-reward mechanism that aggregates signals such as fluency and naturalness and dynamically reweighs them via gradient feedback. We evaluate MORE on two real-world dialogue systems at ByteDance and the MultiWOZ 2.2 benchmark, where it consistently outperforms strong baselines. In 14-day online experiments on ByteDance production traffic, MORE improves overall and reached conversion by 16.53% and 30.09%, while increasing user satisfaction and reducing handoff rates. Notably, in a human-machine comparison, MORE recovers about 60% of the incremental conversion lift achieved by human agents.
Related papers
- GDPO-Listener: Expressive Interactive Head Generation via Auto-Regressive Flow Matching and Group reward-Decoupled Policy Optimization [5.5806589487812746]
GDPO-Listener is a novel framework that achieves highly expressive speaking and listening motion generation.<n>We introduce an Auto-Regressive Flow Matching architecture enabling stable supervised learning.<n>By isolating reward normalization across distinct FLAME parameter groups, GDPO explicitly incentivizes high variance expressive generations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-26T04:36:27Z) - Omni-AutoThink: Adaptive Multimodal Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning [57.96134674544638]
We propose a novel adaptive reasoning framework that dynamically adjusts the model's reasoning depth according to task difficulty.<n>Our framework comprises two stages: (1) an Adaptive Supervised Fine-Tuning stage, which endows the Omni model with fundamental reasoning capability using large-scale reasoning-augmented data, and (2) an Adaptive Reinforcement Learning stage, which optimize reasoning behaviors based on task complexity and reward feedback.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-03T13:33:28Z) - CHOIR: Collaborative Harmonization fOr Inference Robustness [25.458744810976672]
Persona-assigned Large Language Models (LLMs) can adopt diverse roles, enabling personalized and context-aware reasoning.<n>Minor demographic perturbations in personas, such as simple pronoun changes, can alter reasoning trajectories, leading to divergent sets of correct answers.<n>We propose CHOIR, a test-time framework that harmonizes multiple persona-conditioned reasoning signals into a unified prediction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-26T01:20:24Z) - UserRL: Training Interactive User-Centric Agent via Reinforcement Learning [104.63494870852894]
Reinforcement learning (RL) has shown promise in training agentic models that engage in dynamic, multi-turn interactions.<n>We propose UserRL, a unified framework for training and evaluating user-centric abilities through standardized gym environments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-24T03:33:20Z) - STARec: An Efficient Agent Framework for Recommender Systems via Autonomous Deliberate Reasoning [54.28691219536054]
We introduce STARec, a slow-thinking augmented agent framework that endows recommender systems with autonomous deliberative reasoning capabilities.<n>We develop anchored reinforcement training - a two-stage paradigm combining structured knowledge distillation from advanced reasoning models with preference-aligned reward shaping.<n>Experiments on MovieLens 1M and Amazon CDs benchmarks demonstrate that STARec achieves substantial performance gains compared with state-of-the-art baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-26T08:47:58Z) - ReAgent-V: A Reward-Driven Multi-Agent Framework for Video Understanding [71.654781631463]
ReAgent-V is a novel agentic video understanding framework.<n>It integrates efficient frame selection with real-time reward generation during inference.<n>Extensive experiments on 12 datasets demonstrate significant gains in generalization and reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-02T04:23:21Z) - Reinforcing Video Reasoning with Focused Thinking [65.85683941058916]
We propose TW-GRPO, a novel framework that enhances visual reasoning with focused thinking and dense reward granularity.<n>Specifically, we employ a token weighting mechanism that prioritizes tokens with high informational density.<n>We also reformulate RL training by shifting from single-choice to multi-choice QA tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-30T15:42:19Z) - Semantic-Preserving Adversarial Attacks on LLMs: An Adaptive Greedy Binary Search Approach [15.658579092368981]
Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly rely on automatic prompt engineering in graphical user interfaces (GUIs) to refine user inputs and enhance response accuracy.<n>We propose the Adaptive Greedy Binary Search (AGBS) method, which simulates common prompt optimization mechanisms while preserving semantic stability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-26T15:41:06Z) - On the Role of Feedback in Test-Time Scaling of Agentic AI Workflows [71.92083784393418]
Agentic AI (systems that autonomously plan and act) are becoming widespread, yet their task success rate on complex tasks remains low.<n>Inference-time alignment relies on three components: sampling, evaluation, and feedback.<n>We introduce Iterative Agent Decoding (IAD), a procedure that repeatedly inserts feedback extracted from different forms of critiques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-02T17:40:47Z) - Uncertain Multi-Objective Recommendation via Orthogonal Meta-Learning Enhanced Bayesian Optimization [30.031396809114625]
We introduce a novel framework that categorizes RS autonomy into five distinct levels, ranging from basic rule-based accuracy-driven systems to behavior-aware, uncertain multi-objective RSs.<n>We propose an approach that dynamically identifies and optimize multiple objectives based on individual user preferences, fostering more ethical and intelligent user-centric recommendations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-18T08:10:09Z) - Self-Exploring Language Models: Active Preference Elicitation for Online Alignment [88.56809269990625]
We propose a bilevel objective optimistically biased towards potentially high-reward responses to actively explore out-of-distribution regions.
Our experimental results demonstrate that when fine-tuned on Zephyr-7B-SFT and Llama-3-8B-Instruct models, Self-Exploring Language Models (SELM) significantly boosts the performance on instruction-following benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-29T17:59:07Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.