Dep-LLM: Training-Free Depression Diagnosis via Evidence-Guided Structured Multi-factor with Reliable LLM Reasoning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.10796v1
- Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 12:44:12 GMT
- Title: Dep-LLM: Training-Free Depression Diagnosis via Evidence-Guided Structured Multi-factor with Reliable LLM Reasoning
- Abstract summary: Dep-LLM is a training-free framework that mirrors the step-by-step reasoning of clinical psychiatrists.<n>It operates entirely on frozen off-the-shelf foundation LLMs.<n>It surpasses zero-shot baseline on nearly all 21 foundation LLMs across 9 metrics such as accuracy, macro F1 and weighted-average F1.
- Score: 12.568172258915801
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Automatic Depression Detection (ADD) from clinical interviews is a pivotal task in computational mental health, yet it remains challenging due to two critical obstacles: 1) difficulty in modeling complex but sparsely distributed depression clues within lengthy, multi-topic clinical interviews, leading to superficial and unreliable reasoning; 2) scarcity of labeled data due to clinical privacy, together with high cost of training and fine-tuning, limiting the deployment of supervised ADD systems. To jointly address these challenges, we propose Dep-LLM, a training-free framework that mirrors the step-by-step reasoning of clinical psychiatrists and operates entirely on frozen off-the-shelf foundation LLMs. Dep-LLM comprises three stages. First, a Chain-of-Thought (CoT) Depression Multi-factor Analysis module structurally decomposes the long dialogue into five clinically aligned themes and produces evidence-grounded rationales, effectively handling long-context dependencies. Second, we introduce Confidence Analysis and Modulation module that quantifies the epistemic reliability from token-level entropy of each rationale and applies an intra-label and inter-theme modulation that amplifies trustworthy signals while suppressing uncertain ones without extra training. Third, a Collaborative Multi-factor Prediction module dynamically integrates multi-factor signals weighted by confidence into the final diagnosis. Extensive experiments on the DAIC-WOZ and E-DAIC datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and generalizability of Dep-LLM: it surpasses zero-shot baseline on nearly all 21 foundation LLMs across 9 metrics such as accuracy, macro F1 and weighted-average F1, and further outperforms state-of-the-art supervised domain-specific LLMs as well as the latest closed-source commercial LLMs, while requiring no extra training.
Related papers
- From Answers to Arguments: Toward Trustworthy Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning with Toulmin-Guided Curriculum Goal-Conditioned Learning [17.420995251535647]
Large Language Models (LLMs) produce "correct answers through flawed reasoning"<n>In this paper, we establish a framework for trustworthy clinical argumentation by adapting the Toulmin model to the diagnostic process.<n>We propose a novel training pipeline: Curriculum Goal-Conditioned Learning (CGCL)<n> Experiments show that our method achieves diagnostic accuracy and reasoning quality comparable to resource-intensive Reinforcement Learning (RL) methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-13T07:49:39Z) - A Federated and Parameter-Efficient Framework for Large Language Model Training in Medicine [59.78991974851707]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance on medical benchmarks, including question answering and diagnosis.<n>Most medical LLMs are trained on data from a single institution, which faces limitations in generalizability and safety in heterogeneous systems.<n>We introduce the model-agnostic and parameter-efficient federated learning framework for adapting LLMs to medical applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-29T18:48:21Z) - MMedExpert-R1: Strengthening Multimodal Medical Reasoning via Domain-Specific Adaptation and Clinical Guideline Reinforcement [63.82954136824963]
Medical Vision-Language Models excel at perception tasks with complex clinical reasoning required in real-world scenarios.<n>We propose a novel reasoning MedVLM that addresses these challenges through domain-specific adaptation and guideline reinforcement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-16T02:32:07Z) - OncoReason: Structuring Clinical Reasoning in LLMs for Robust and Interpretable Survival Prediction [2.904892426557913]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong performance in biomedical NLP.<n>We present a unified, multi-task learning framework that aligns autoregressive LLMs with clinical reasoning for outcome prediction.<n>Our findings underscore the importance of reasoning-aware alignment in multi-task clinical modeling.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-20T13:35:12Z) - Hierarchical Self-Supervised Representation Learning for Depression Detection from Speech [51.14752758616364]
Speech-based depression detection (SDD) is a promising, non-invasive alternative to traditional clinical assessments.<n>We propose HAREN-CTC, a novel architecture that integrates multi-layer SSL features using cross-attention within a multitask learning framework.<n>The model achieves state-of-the-art macro F1-scores of 0.81 on DAIC-WOZ and 0.82 on MODMA, outperforming prior methods across both evaluation scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-05T09:32:12Z) - Revealing Multimodal Causality with Large Language Models [80.95511545591107]
We propose MLLM-CD, a novel framework for multimodal causal discovery from unstructured data.<n>It consists of three key components: (1) a novel contrastive factor discovery module to identify genuine multimodal factors; (2) a statistical causal structure discovery module to infer causal relationships among discovered factors; and (3) an iterative multimodal counterfactual reasoning module to refine the discovery outcomes.<n>Extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed MLLM-CD.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-22T13:45:17Z) - Trustworthy AI Psychotherapy: Multi-Agent LLM Workflow for Counseling and Explainable Mental Disorder Diagnosis [11.025486717604972]
DSM5AgentFlow is the first LLM-based agent workflow designed to autonomously generate DSM-5 Level-1 diagnostic questionnaires.<n>By simulating therapist-client dialogues with specific client profiles, the framework delivers transparent, step-by-step disorder predictions.<n>This workflow serves as a complementary tool for mental health diagnosis, ensuring adherence to ethical and legal standards.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-15T11:08:32Z) - MLlm-DR: Towards Explainable Depression Recognition with MultiModal Large Language Models [28.873959594226605]
Automated depression diagnosis aims to analyze multimodal information from interview videos to predict participants' depression scores.<n>Previous studies often lack clear explanations of how these scores were determined, limiting their adoption in clinical practice.<n>We propose a novel multimodal large language model (MLlm-DR) that can understand multimodal information inputs and supports explainable depression diagnosis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-08T01:56:39Z) - Silence is Not Consensus: Disrupting Agreement Bias in Multi-Agent LLMs via Catfish Agent for Clinical Decision Making [80.94208848596215]
We present a new concept called Catfish Agent, a role-specialized LLM designed to inject structured dissent and counter silent agreement.<n>Inspired by the catfish effect'' in organizational psychology, the Catfish Agent is designed to challenge emerging consensus to stimulate deeper reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-27T17:59:50Z) - AGIR: Assessing 3D Gait Impairment with Reasoning based on LLMs [0.0]
gait impairment plays an important role in early diagnosis, disease monitoring, and treatment evaluation for neurodegenerative diseases.<n>Recent deep learning-based approaches have consistently improved classification accuracies, but they often lack interpretability.<n>We introduce AGIR, a novel pipeline consisting of a pre-trained VQ-VAE motion tokenizer and a Large Language Model (LLM) fine-tuned over pairs of motion tokens.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-23T17:12:16Z) - LlaMADRS: Prompting Large Language Models for Interview-Based Depression Assessment [75.44934940580112]
This study introduces LlaMADRS, a novel framework leveraging open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate depression severity assessment.<n>We employ a zero-shot prompting strategy with carefully designed cues to guide the model in interpreting and scoring transcribed clinical interviews.<n>Our approach, tested on 236 real-world interviews, demonstrates strong correlations with clinician assessments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-07T08:49:04Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.