Test-Time Gradient Guidance of Flow Policies in Reinforcement Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.11087v1
• Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 16:45:57 GMT
• Title: Test-Time Gradient Guidance of Flow Policies in Reinforcement Learning
• Abstract summary: Expressive continuous control policies form the backbone of advances in scaling imitation learning for simulated and real robot control.<n>We propose QGF (Q-Guided Flow), an RL algorithm that performs policy optimization entirely at test time.<n> Empirically, QGF outperforms prior test-time RL methods on single-task and goal-conditioned offline RL benchmarks.
• Score: 50.738952715864116
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Expressive continuous control policies, such as diffusion and flow models, form the backbone of recent advances in scaling imitation learning for simulated and real robot control. While they are known to scale stably in the supervised imitation learning setting, incorporating them into reinforcement learning (RL) pipelines for policy improvement has proven more difficult. It often requires specialized training objectives or backpropagating through denoising processes, which cause well-known issues with stability and affect scalability. In this paper we study the question of whether simple policy improvement schemes at test time alone, leaving stable supervised policy training intact, can be a competitive alternative which sidesteps these issues. To this end, we propose QGF (Q-Guided Flow), an RL algorithm that performs policy optimization entirely at test time. QGF works by pre-training both a reference flow policy (via a standard behavioral cloning objective) and a value function critic and, at test time, using the value gradient to guide the reference policy to generate higher-value actions without any additional policy learning. Empirically, QGF outperforms prior test-time RL methods on single-task and goal-conditioned offline RL benchmarks with high-dimensional action spaces, and is competitive with state-of-the-art training-time algorithms while being much cheaper to run. Moreover, it exhibits favorable scaling with model size by avoiding the instability of actor-critic training, offering a practical and effective alternative RL algorithm with expressive policies.

Related papers

• A Step Back: Prefix Importance Ratio Stabilizes Policy Optimization [58.116300485427764]
  Reinforcement learning post-training can elicit reasoning behaviors in large language models.<n> token-level correction often leads to unstable training dynamics when the degree of off-policyness is large.<n>We propose a simple yet effective objective, Minimum Prefix Ratio (MinPRO)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T08:47:19Z)
• Q-learning with Adjoint Matching [58.78551025170267]
  We propose Q-learning with Adjoint Matching (QAM), a novel TD-based reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm.<n>QAM sidesteps two challenges by leveraging adjoint matching, a recently proposed technique in generative modeling.<n>It consistently outperforms prior approaches on hard, sparse reward tasks in both offline and offline-to-online RL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-20T18:45:34Z)
• Stabilizing Policy Gradients for Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning in LLM Reasoning [77.92320830700797]
  Reinforcement Learning has played a central role in enabling reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models.<n>We propose a tractable computational framework that tracks and leverages curvature information during policy updates.<n>The algorithm, Curvature-Aware Policy Optimization (CAPO), identifies samples that contribute to unstable updates and masks them out.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-01T12:29:32Z)
• Relative Entropy Pathwise Policy Optimization [66.03329137921949]
  We present an on-policy algorithm that trains Q-value models purely from on-policy trajectories.<n>We show how to combine policies for exploration with constrained updates for stable training, and evaluate important architectural components that stabilize value function learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-15T06:24:07Z)
• Flow-Based Policy for Online Reinforcement Learning [34.86742824686496]
  FlowRL is a framework for online reinforcement learning that integrates flow-based policy representation with Wasserstein-2-regularized optimization.<n>We show that FlowRL achieves competitive performance in online reinforcement learning benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-15T10:53:35Z)
• CPGD: Toward Stable Rule-based Reinforcement Learning for Language Models [11.295986905174635]
  Rule-based reinforcement learning (RL) has improved the reasoning capability of language models (LMs) with rule-based rewards.<n>Existing RL methods often suffer from training instability, where large policy updates and improper clipping can lead to training collapse.<n>We propose Clipped Policy Gradient Optimization with Policy Drift (CPGD), a novel algorithm designed to stabilize policy learning in LMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-18T17:44:53Z)
• Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning [106.05582605650932]
  We show that CQL substantially outperforms existing offline RL methods, often learning policies that attain 2-5 times higher final return. We theoretically show that CQL produces a lower bound on the value of the current policy and that it can be incorporated into a policy learning procedure with theoretical improvement guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-08T17:53:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.