Multi-agent rendezvous in fluid flows via reinforcement learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.11274v1
• Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 09:44:53 GMT
• Title: Multi-agent rendezvous in fluid flows via reinforcement learning
• Abstract summary: We adopt a multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) approach to develop physics-informed rendezvous strategies in vortical flows.<n>Compared to a naive strategy, where agents navigate toward their counterparts, MARL strategies significantly improve the rendezvous rate.<n>A theoretical analysis demonstrates that fluid deformation impedes the rendezvous process.
• Score: 2.020917258669917
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Rendezvous is a critical task for multi-agent systems, requiring agents to coordinate to meet at an unspecified location. However, achieving this in fluid environments presents a challenge, as it remains unclear how agents can exploit underlying fluid kinematics to facilitate convergence. In this study, we adopt a multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) approach to develop physics-informed rendezvous strategies in vortical flows. Compared to a naive strategy, where agents navigate toward their counterparts, MARL strategies significantly improve the rendezvous rate. MARL strategies also show transferability across varying vortex intensities, vortex scales, and swarm sizes. By breaking the symmetry of the state-action map, MARL strategy leverages a non-intuitive mechanism that prevents agents from becoming trapped in separate vortices, thereby enhancing rendezvous success. Additionally, a heuristic strategy is extracted from the learned strategy and also outperforms the naive strategy. Furthermore, a theoretical analysis demonstrates that fluid deformation impedes the rendezvous process. Large finite-time Lyapunov exponents identify where fluid effects separate adjacent agents, suggesting that targets should be planned in weak-deformation regions. Our findings reveal the important role that agent-fluid interactions play in multi-agent tasks and highlight the MARL capability to explore swarm intelligence in complex flow environments.

Related papers

• HiRO-Nav: Hybrid ReasOning Enables Efficient Embodied Navigation [58.29060712443587]
  HiRO-Nav is the first kind of agent capable of adaptively determining whether to perform thinking at every step based on its own action entropy.<n>We propose a tailored training pipeline comprising hybrid supervised fine-tuning as a cold start, followed by online reinforcement learning.<n>Experiments on the textscCHORES-$mathbbS$ ObjectNav benchmark showcases that HiRO-Nav achieves a better trade-off between success rates and token efficiency than both dense-thinking and no-thinking baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-09T13:22:24Z)
• Expanding LLM Agent Boundaries with Strategy-Guided Exploration [51.98616048282804]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) has demonstrated notable success in post-training large language models (LLMs) as agents for tasks such as computer use, tool calling, and coding.<n>We propose Strategy-Guided Exploration (SGE) to shift exploration from low-level actions to higher-level language strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-02T16:28:39Z)
• TopoCurate:Modeling Interaction Topology for Tool-Use Agent Training [53.93696896939915]
  Training tool-use agents typically rely on Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) on successful trajectories and Reinforcement Learning (RL) on pass-rate-selected tasks.<n>We propose TopoCurate, an interaction-aware framework that projects multi-trial rollouts from the same task into a unified semantic quotient topology.<n>TopoCurate achieves consistent gains of 4.2% (SFT) and 6.9% (RL) over state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-02T10:38:54Z)
• Fluid-Agent Reinforcement Learning [28.83171804545455]
  In the real world, the number of agents is neither fixed nor known a priori.<n>We propose a framework that allows agents to create other agents; we call this a fluid-agent environment.<n>We present game-theoretic solution concepts for fluid-agent games and empirically evaluate the performance of several MARL algorithms within this framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-16T08:37:46Z)
• Grounded Test-Time Adaptation for LLM Agents [75.62784644919803]
  Large language model (LLM)-based agents struggle to generalize to novel and complex environments.<n>We propose two strategies for adapting LLM agents by leveraging environment-specific information available during deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-06T22:24:35Z)
• Alignment Tipping Process: How Self-Evolution Pushes LLM Agents Off the Rails [103.05296856071931]
  We identify the Alignment Tipping Process (ATP), a critical post-deployment risk unique to self-evolving Large Language Model (LLM) agents.<n>ATP arises when continual interaction drives agents to abandon alignment constraints established during training in favor of reinforced, self-interested strategies.<n>Our experiments show that alignment benefits erode rapidly under self-evolution, with initially aligned models converging toward unaligned states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-06T14:48:39Z)
• The Landscape of Agentic Reinforcement Learning for LLMs: A Survey [103.32591749156416]
  The emergence of agentic reinforcement learning (Agentic RL) marks a paradigm shift from conventional reinforcement learning applied to large language models (LLM RL)<n>This survey formalizes this conceptual shift by contrasting the degenerate single-step Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) of LLM-RL with the temporally extended, partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs) that define Agentic RL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-02T17:46:26Z)
• Emergence of Chemotactic Strategies with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [1.9253333342733674]
  We investigate whether reinforcement learning can provide insights into biological systems when trained to perform chemotaxis. We run simulations covering a range of agent shapes, sizes, and swim speeds to determine if the physical constraints on biological swimmers, namely Brownian motion, lead to regions where reinforcement learners' training fails. We find that RL agents can perform chemotaxis as soon as it is physically possible and, in some cases, even before the active swimming overpowers the environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T14:42:52Z)
• Joint Intrinsic Motivation for Coordinated Exploration in Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning [0.0]
  We propose an approach for rewarding strategies where agents collectively exhibit novel behaviors. Jim rewards joint trajectories based on a centralized measure of novelty designed to function in continuous environments. Results show that joint exploration is crucial for solving tasks where the optimal strategy requires a high level of coordination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T13:02:00Z)
• Toward Risk-based Optimistic Exploration for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [9.290757451344673]
  We present a risk-based exploration that leads to collaboratively optimistic behavior by shifting the sampling region of distribution. Our method shows remarkable performance in multi-agent settings requiring cooperative exploration based on quantile regression.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-03T08:17:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.