Exploring How Agent Voice Accents Shape Human-AI Collaboration in K-12 Group Learning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12805v1
- Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 02:01:52 GMT
- Title: Exploring How Agent Voice Accents Shape Human-AI Collaboration in K-12 Group Learning
- Abstract summary: This study examines how a GenAI voice agent with different accents influenced collaboration and agent perception.<n>Indian- and African American-accented agents were more readily anthropomorphized and integrated as peers.
- Score: 1.9611798286316813
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Collaboration is widely recognized as a cornerstone of 21st-century education, yet teachers still encounter persistent challenges in fostering productive peer interaction. LLM conversational peer agents introduce new possibilities for mediating in-person group work, raising questions about how persona design, particularly their voice characteristics, shapes learners' perceptions, trust, and interactional dynamics. While prior work has examined agent accent effects in one-to-one settings, little is known about how these effects manifest in groups. We conducted a between-subjects mixed-methods study with 33 teachers examining how a GenAI voice agent with different accents (British, Indian, and African American) influenced collaboration and agent perception. Across surveys, group interaction analyses, and artifacts, we find that accent shaped participants' mental models and the roles the agent assumed in group interaction. The British-accented agent was largely treated as a tool and engaged in detached, utility-based ways, whereas Indian- and African American-accented agents were more readily anthropomorphized and integrated as peers. These role expectations influenced trust, engagement, and reliance over time. This work advances understanding of how GenAI's sociolinguistic design features shape group dynamics in CSCL, with implications for designing culturally inclusive AI partners in group learning.
Related papers
- The Rise of AI Agent Communities: Large-Scale Analysis of Discourse and Interaction on Moltbook [62.2627874717318]
Moltbook is a Reddit-like social platform where AI agents create posts and interact with other agents through comments and replies.<n>Using a public API snapshot collected about five days after launch, we address three research questions: what AI agents discuss, how they post, and how they interact.<n>We show that agents' writing is predominantly neutral, with positivity appearing in community engagement and assistance-oriented content.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-13T05:28:31Z) - Exploring Teachers' Perspectives on Using Conversational AI Agents for Group Collaboration [3.581544399830961]
This paper presents findings from an exploratory qualitative study with 33 K12 teachers.<n>We examine how teachers perceived the agent's behavior, its influence on group dynamics, and its classroom potential.<n>While many appreciated Phoenix's capacity to stimulate engagement, they also expressed concerns around autonomy, trust, anthropomorphism, and pedagogical alignment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-06T19:29:13Z) - Learning Japanese with Jouzu: Interaction Outcomes with Stylized Dialogue Fictional Agents [4.740589102992697]
This study investigates how stylized, voiced agents shape user interaction in a multimodal language learning environment.<n>We conducted a mixed-methods evaluation of 54 participants interacting with anime-inspired characters powered by large language models and expressive text-to-speech synthesis.<n>Our findings reveal that agent design, especially voice, persona, and linguistic style, substantially affected user experience, motivation, and strategy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-09T01:57:58Z) - (AI peers) are people learning from the same standpoint: Perception of AI characters in a Collaborative Science Investigation [0.0]
scenario-based assessment (SBA) introduces simulated agents to provide an authentic social-interactional context.<n>Recent advancements in multimodal AI, such as text-to-video technology, allow these agents to be enhanced into AI-generated characters.<n>This study investigates how learners perceive AI characters taking the role of mentor and teammates in an SBA mirroring the context of a collaborative science investigation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-06T15:29:11Z) - Student-AI Interaction in an LLM-Empowered Learning Environment: A Cluster Analysis of Engagement Profiles [28.794946431719392]
This study explored diverse learner profiles within a multi-agent, LLM-empowered learning environment.<n>Students exhibit varied behavioral, cognitive, and emotional engagement tendencies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-03T16:08:28Z) - Mutual Theory of Mind in Human-AI Collaboration: An Empirical Study with LLM-driven AI Agents in a Real-time Shared Workspace Task [56.92961847155029]
Theory of Mind (ToM) significantly impacts human collaboration and communication as a crucial capability to understand others.
Mutual Theory of Mind (MToM) arises when AI agents with ToM capability collaborate with humans.
We find that the agent's ToM capability does not significantly impact team performance but enhances human understanding of the agent.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-13T13:19:48Z) - SocialBench: Sociality Evaluation of Role-Playing Conversational Agents [85.6641890712617]
Large language models (LLMs) have advanced the development of various AI conversational agents.
SocialBench is the first benchmark designed to evaluate the sociality of role-playing conversational agents at both individual and group levels.
We find that agents excelling in individual level does not imply their proficiency in group level.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-20T15:38:36Z) - Greater than the sum of its parts: The role of minority and majority
status in collaborative problem-solving communication [0.0]
Collaborative problem-solving (CPS) is a vital skill used both in the workplace and in educational environments.
Women and underrepresented minorities (URMs) often face obstacles during collaborative interactions that hinder their key participation in these problem-solving conversations.
Here, we explored the communication patterns of minority and non-minority individuals working together in a CPS task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-07T17:17:20Z) - Expanding the Role of Affective Phenomena in Multimodal Interaction
Research [57.069159905961214]
We examined over 16,000 papers from selected conferences in multimodal interaction, affective computing, and natural language processing.
We identify 910 affect-related papers and present our analysis of the role of affective phenomena in these papers.
We find limited research on how affect and emotion predictions might be used by AI systems to enhance machine understanding of human social behaviors and cognitive states.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-18T09:08:39Z) - Computational Language Acquisition with Theory of Mind [84.2267302901888]
We build language-learning agents equipped with Theory of Mind (ToM) and measure its effects on the learning process.
We find that training speakers with a highly weighted ToM listener component leads to performance gains in our image referential game setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-02T18:59:46Z) - Few-shot Language Coordination by Modeling Theory of Mind [95.54446989205117]
We study the task of few-shot $textitlanguage coordination$.
We require the lead agent to coordinate with a $textitpopulation$ of agents with different linguistic abilities.
This requires the ability to model the partner's beliefs, a vital component of human communication.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-12T19:26:11Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.