Greater than the sum of its parts: The role of minority and majority status in collaborative problem-solving communication

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.04671v1
• Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 17:17:20 GMT
• Title: Greater than the sum of its parts: The role of minority and majority status in collaborative problem-solving communication
• Authors: Jacqueline G. Cavazos, Nia Nixon
• Abstract summary: Collaborative problem-solving (CPS) is a vital skill used both in the workplace and in educational environments. Women and underrepresented minorities (URMs) often face obstacles during collaborative interactions that hinder their key participation in these problem-solving conversations. Here, we explored the communication patterns of minority and non-minority individuals working together in a CPS task.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Collaborative problem-solving (CPS) is a vital skill used both in the workplace and in educational environments. CPS is useful in tackling increasingly complex global, economic, and political issues and is considered a central 21st century skill. The increasingly connected global community presents a fruitful opportunity for creative and collaborative problem-solving interactions and solutions that involve diverse perspectives. Unfortunately, women and underrepresented minorities (URMs) often face obstacles during collaborative interactions that hinder their key participation in these problem-solving conversations. Here, we explored the communication patterns of minority and non-minority individuals working together in a CPS task. Group Communication Analysis (GCA), a temporally-sensitive computational linguistic tool, was used to examine how URM status impacts individuals' sociocognitive linguistic patterns. Results show differences across racial/ethnic groups in key sociocognitive features that indicate fruitful collaborative interactions. We also investigated how the groups' racial/ethnic composition impacts both individual and group communication patterns. In general, individuals in more demographically diverse groups displayed more productive communication behaviors than individuals who were in majority-dominated groups. We discuss the implications of individual and group diversity on communication patterns that emerge during CPS and how these patterns can impact collaborative outcomes.

Related papers

• Investigating the Impact of Interpersonal Challenges on Feeling Welcome in OSS [20.055675387635212]
  Interpersonal challenges can inhibit a feeling of welcomeness among contributors, particularly from underrepresented groups. Here, we investigate the effects of interpersonal challenges on the sense of welcomeness among diverse populations within OSS. We found that different challenges have unique impacts on how people feel welcomed, with variations across gender, race, and disability groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-03T15:11:50Z)
• Mutual Theory of Mind in Human-AI Collaboration: An Empirical Study with LLM-driven AI Agents in a Real-time Shared Workspace Task [56.92961847155029]
  Theory of Mind (ToM) significantly impacts human collaboration and communication as a crucial capability to understand others. Mutual Theory of Mind (MToM) arises when AI agents with ToM capability collaborate with humans. We find that the agent's ToM capability does not significantly impact team performance but enhances human understanding of the agent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-13T13:19:48Z)
• Diversity's Double-Edged Sword: Analyzing Race's Effect on Remote Pair Programming Interactions [0.5999777817331317]
  Mixed-race pairs excelled in task distribution, shared decision-making, and role-exchange but encountered communication challenges, discomfort, and anxiety. Our study emphasizes race's impact on remote pair programming and underscores the need for diverse tools and methods to address racial disparities for collaboration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T01:58:38Z)
• GOMA: Proactive Embodied Cooperative Communication via Goal-Oriented Mental Alignment [72.96949760114575]
  We propose a novel cooperative communication framework, Goal-Oriented Mental Alignment (GOMA) GOMA formulates verbal communication as a planning problem that minimizes the misalignment between parts of agents' mental states that are relevant to the goals. We evaluate our approach against strong baselines in two challenging environments, Overcooked (a multiplayer game) and VirtualHome (a household simulator)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-17T03:52:52Z)
• Bridging or Breaking: Impact of Intergroup Interactions on Religious Polarization [10.640364016644883]
  We examine whether intergroup interactions around important events affect polarization between majority and minority groups in social networks. We use data on the religious identity of nearly 700,000 Indian Twitter users engaging in COVID-19-related discourse during 2020. We find that for political and social events, intergroup interactions reduce polarization. This decline is weaker for individuals at the extreme who already exhibit high conformity to their group. In contrast, during communal events, intergroup interactions can increase group conformity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T07:21:09Z)
• Adaptive Coordination in Social Embodied Rearrangement [49.35582108902819]
  We study zero-shot coordination (ZSC) in this task, where an agent collaborates with a new partner, emulating a scenario where a robot collaborates with a new human partner. We propose Behavior Diversity Play (BDP), a novel ZSC approach that encourages diversity through a discriminability objective. Our results demonstrate that BDP learns adaptive agents that can tackle visual coordination, and zero-shot generalize to new partners in unseen environments, achieving 35% higher success and 32% higher efficiency compared to baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T18:05:51Z)
• Expanding the Role of Affective Phenomena in Multimodal Interaction Research [57.069159905961214]
  We examined over 16,000 papers from selected conferences in multimodal interaction, affective computing, and natural language processing. We identify 910 affect-related papers and present our analysis of the role of affective phenomena in these papers. We find limited research on how affect and emotion predictions might be used by AI systems to enhance machine understanding of human social behaviors and cognitive states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T09:08:39Z)
• The Double-Edged Sword of Diversity: How Diversity, Conflict, and Psychological Safety Impact Software Teams [6.190511747986327]
  Team diversity can be seen as a double-edged sword, bringing cognitive resources to teams at the risk of increased conflict. This study views diversity through the lens of the categorization-elaboration model (CEM) We investigated how diversity in gender, age, role, and cultural background impacts team effectiveness and conflict.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-30T14:54:44Z)
• Co-Located Human-Human Interaction Analysis using Nonverbal Cues: A Survey [71.43956423427397]
  We aim to identify the nonverbal cues and computational methodologies resulting in effective performance. This survey differs from its counterparts by involving the widest spectrum of social phenomena and interaction settings. Some major observations are: the most often used nonverbal cue, computational method, interaction environment, and sensing approach are speaking activity, support vector machines, and meetings composed of 3-4 persons equipped with microphones and cameras, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-20T13:37:57Z)
• Improved cooperation by balancing exploration and exploitation in intertemporal social dilemma tasks [2.541277269153809]
  We propose a new learning strategy for achieving coordination by incorporating a learning rate that can balance exploration and exploitation. We show that agents that use the simple strategy improve a relatively collective return in a decision task called the intertemporal social dilemma. We also explore the effects of the diversity of learning rates on the population of reinforcement learning agents and show that agents trained in heterogeneous populations develop particularly coordinated policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-19T08:40:56Z)
• On Emergent Communication in Competitive Multi-Agent Teams [116.95067289206919]
  We investigate whether competition for performance from an external, similar agent team could act as a social influence. Our results show that an external competitive influence leads to improved accuracy and generalization, as well as faster emergence of communicative languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-04T01:14:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.