Disparate Impact in Synthetic Data Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.13105v1
• Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 09:33:12 GMT
• Title: Disparate Impact in Synthetic Data Generation
• Abstract summary: We revisit the notion of disparate impact for synthetic data generation.<n>We argue that non-disparate impact is achieved when the synthetic and real distributions are the same.
• Score: 10.23887083601828
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We revisit the fairness notion of disparate impact for synthetic data generation (SDG), that assesses whether the utility of generated records is the same across sensitive groups. Our approach departs from existing work on fair SDG, that address the problem of correcting for undue biases in the observed distribution, hence redefining SDG as learning a distribution that is not that of the real data. By contrast, non-disparate impact is notably achieved when the synthetic and real distributions are the same. We expose reasons why SDG may fail to reach that solution and discuss why approximation and estimation errors occur and can be disparate across groups. We notably look into the expressive power of SDG methods relative to distribution complexity, sampling errors due to group proportions, and estimation errors induced by differential privacy mechanisms. We illustrate cases of disparate impact on both artificial and real-world data, focusing on SDG methods that rely on probabilistic graphical models. We also introduce a strategy of learning group-wise SDG models and illustrate how it can improve both the overall utility and its parity in many settings.

Related papers

• Statistical Properties of Robust Learning under Distributional Shifts [12.995907626827794]
  This paper studies generalization error in the target environment---the excess loss under the shifted target distribution.<n>We derive finite-sample generalization error bounds in the shifted target environment for both DRO and RS.<n>We apply the framework to a network lot-sizing problem, using it to interpret how robust policies respond to positive shifts in the demand distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-13T12:06:48Z)
• Multi-environment Invariance Learning with Missing Data [0.0]
  In this work, we establish non-asymptotic guarantees on variable selection property and $ell$ error convergence rates.<n>We evaluate the performance of the new estimator through extensive simulations and demonstrate its application using the UCI Bike Sharing dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T06:30:58Z)
• DeCaf: A Causal Decoupling Framework for OOD Generalization on Node Classification [14.96980804513399]
  Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are susceptible to distribution shifts, creating vulnerability and security issues in critical domains. Existing methods that target learning an invariant (feature, structure)-label mapping often depend on oversimplified assumptions about the data generation process. We introduce a more realistic graph data generation model using Structural Causal Models (SCMs) We propose a casual decoupling framework, DeCaf, that independently learns unbiased feature-label and structure-label mappings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-27T00:22:18Z)
• Fairness-Aware Estimation of Graphical Models [13.39268712338485]
  This paper examines the issue of fairness in the estimation of graphical models (GMs) Standard GMs can result in biased outcomes, especially when the underlying data involves sensitive characteristics or protected groups. We introduce a comprehensive framework designed to reduce bias in the estimation of GMs related to protected attributes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-30T16:30:00Z)
• Counterfactual Fairness through Transforming Data Orthogonal to Bias [7.109458605736819]
  We propose a novel data pre-processing algorithm, Orthogonal to Bias (OB)<n>OB is designed to eliminate the influence of a group of continuous sensitive variables, thus promoting counterfactual fairness in machine learning applications.<n>OB is model-agnostic, making it applicable to a wide range of machine learning models and tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T16:40:08Z)
• Chasing Fairness Under Distribution Shift: A Model Weight Perturbation Approach [72.19525160912943]
  We first theoretically demonstrate the inherent connection between distribution shift, data perturbation, and model weight perturbation. We then analyze the sufficient conditions to guarantee fairness for the target dataset. Motivated by these sufficient conditions, we propose robust fairness regularization (RFR)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-06T17:19:23Z)
• DRFLM: Distributionally Robust Federated Learning with Inter-client Noise via Local Mixup [58.894901088797376]
  federated learning has emerged as a promising approach for training a global model using data from multiple organizations without leaking their raw data. We propose a general framework to solve the above two challenges simultaneously. We provide comprehensive theoretical analysis including robustness analysis, convergence analysis, and generalization ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-16T08:08:29Z)
• Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performance [63.740181251997306]
  Real-world machine learning deployments are characterized by mismatches between the source (training) and target (test) distributions. In this work, we investigate methods for predicting the target domain accuracy using only labeled source data and unlabeled target data. We propose Average Thresholded Confidence (ATC), a practical method that learns a threshold on the model's confidence, predicting accuracy as the fraction of unlabeled examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-11T23:01:12Z)
• Accuracy on the Line: On the Strong Correlation Between Out-of-Distribution and In-Distribution Generalization [89.73665256847858]
  We show that out-of-distribution performance is strongly correlated with in-distribution performance for a wide range of models and distribution shifts. Specifically, we demonstrate strong correlations between in-distribution and out-of-distribution performance on variants of CIFAR-10 & ImageNet. We also investigate cases where the correlation is weaker, for instance some synthetic distribution shifts from CIFAR-10-C and the tissue classification dataset Camelyon17-WILDS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-09T19:48:23Z)
• Predicting with Confidence on Unseen Distributions [90.68414180153897]
  We connect domain adaptation and predictive uncertainty literature to predict model accuracy on challenging unseen distributions. We find that the difference of confidences (DoC) of a classifier's predictions successfully estimates the classifier's performance change over a variety of shifts. We specifically investigate the distinction between synthetic and natural distribution shifts and observe that despite its simplicity DoC consistently outperforms other quantifications of distributional difference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-07T15:50:18Z)
• Examining and Combating Spurious Features under Distribution Shift [94.31956965507085]
  We define and analyze robust and spurious representations using the information-theoretic concept of minimal sufficient statistics. We prove that even when there is only bias of the input distribution, models can still pick up spurious features from their training data. Inspired by our analysis, we demonstrate that group DRO can fail when groups do not directly account for various spurious correlations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-14T05:39:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.