A Quantitative Experimental Repeated Measures Study of Training Dynamics in a Small Llama Style Language Model Under a Compute-Aware Token Budget

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.13370v1
• Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 13:55:26 GMT
• Title: A Quantitative Experimental Repeated Measures Study of Training Dynamics in a Small Llama Style Language Model Under a Compute-Aware Token Budget
• Abstract summary: This study examines training dynamics in a small Llama-style language model trained under a compute-constrained token budget.<n>Six independent training runs were conducted using the TinyStories corpus, CPU-based full-precision training, and a target budget of approximately 20 million cumulative training tokens.<n>Repeated measures ANOVA showed statistically significant interval effects for validation loss, validation perplexity, and rolling volatility.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This study examines training dynamics in a small Llama-style language model trained under a fixed, compute-constrained token budget. Rather than evaluating efficiency solely through endpoint performance, the study uses a quantitative experimental repeated measures design to analyze how validation loss, validation perplexity, rolling volatility, backslide behavior, spike behavior, and between-seed variability change across token-based training intervals. Six independent training runs were conducted on a 4.26-million-parameter model using the TinyStories corpus, CPU-based full-precision training, and a target budget of approximately 20 million cumulative training tokens. Metrics were collected across 21 intervals, producing 126 seed-by-interval observations. Repeated measures ANOVA showed statistically significant interval effects for validation loss, validation perplexity, and rolling volatility. Descriptive trajectories revealed rapid early improvement followed by non-monotonic degradation during later training intervals. Mean validation loss decreased from 8.3552 at initialization to 2.7996 near 4 million tokens, but increased to 3.9010 by the final checkpoint. Validation perplexity followed the same pattern, falling sharply early in training before rising later. Derived telemetry further showed recurrent validation-loss backslides and no interval-summary evidence of a stable phase under the predefined criteria. These findings suggest that compute-aware language model evaluation should examine training trajectories rather than endpoint metrics alone. In constrained compute settings, additional token exposure may increase computational cost without producing proportional generalization gains, and interval-level telemetry can reveal instability, regression, and diminishing returns that final metrics may obscure.

Related papers

• Ring-Zero: Scaling Zero RL to a Trillion Parameters for Emergent Reasoning [55.99621402404222]
  Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards without human-annotated data, often referred to as zero RL, has emerged as a powerful paradigm for eliciting chain-of-thought reasoning.<n>We aim to elicit high-quality reasoning behaviors from the model.<n>We find that naive scaling often suffers from poor readability, token redundancy, and a lack of adaptive reasoning depth.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-14T06:14:55Z)
• Gradient-Flow Optimization as Dynamic Random-Effects Inference: Testing and Early Stopping with Applications to Deep Learning [16.158545640309438]
  We develop a statistical inference framework for gradient-flow training itself.<n>Training time becomes a variance-component parameter governing how variance is reallocated.<n>Deep learning models in fixed gradient regimes provide modern-AI instantiations of the theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-27T05:32:24Z)
• Predictive Batch Scheduling: Accelerating Language Model Training Through Loss-Aware Sample Prioritization [0.33842793760651557]
  We introduce Predictive Batch Scheduling (PBS), a novel training optimization technique.<n>PBS prioritizes high-loss samples during batch construction.<n>Our predictor achieves 0.44 correlation with actual loss using only four simple features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T04:15:39Z)
• Revisiting the Scaling Properties of Downstream Metrics in Large Language Model Training [11.179110411255708]
  We propose a direct framework to model the scaling of benchmark performance from the training budget.<n>Our results show that the direct approach extrapolates better than the previously proposed two-stage procedure.<n>We release the complete set of pretraining losses and downstream evaluation results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-09T18:33:48Z)
• EDIT: Early Diffusion Inference Termination for dLLMs Based on Dynamics of Training Gradients [6.736735746633275]
  Diffusion-based large language models (dLLMs) refine token generations through iterative denoising, but answers often stabilize before all steps complete.<n>We propose EDIT, an inference-time criterion that adaptively stops denoising once sufficient reasoning stability relative to training-time reasoning is detected.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-29T23:47:47Z)
• Instance-dependent Early Stopping [57.912273923450726]
  We propose an Instance-dependent Early Stopping (IES) method that adapts the early stopping mechanism from the entire training set to the instance level.<n>IES considers an instance as mastered if the second-order differences of its loss value remain within a small range around zero.<n>IES can reduce backpropagation instances by 10%-50% while maintaining or even slightly improving the test accuracy and transfer learning performance of a model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T13:34:09Z)
• The Journey Matters: Average Parameter Count over Pre-training Unifies Sparse and Dense Scaling Laws [51.608402959163925]
  We present the first systematic exploration of optimal sparse pre-training configurations for large language models.<n>We find that initiating pruning at 25% of total training compute and concluding at 75% achieves near-optimal final evaluation loss.<n>We propose a new scaling law that modifies the Chinchilla scaling law to use the average parameter count over pre-training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-21T20:23:22Z)
• Rethinking Classifier Re-Training in Long-Tailed Recognition: A Simple Logits Retargeting Approach [102.0769560460338]
  We develop a simple logits approach (LORT) without the requirement of prior knowledge of the number of samples per class. Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on various imbalanced datasets, including CIFAR100-LT, ImageNet-LT, and iNaturalist 2018.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-01T03:27:08Z)
• Adapting to Continuous Covariate Shift via Online Density Ratio Estimation [64.8027122329609]
  Dealing with distribution shifts is one of the central challenges for modern machine learning. We propose an online method that can appropriately reuse historical information. Our density ratio estimation method is proven to perform well by enjoying a dynamic regret bound.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T04:03:33Z)
• Predicting Training Time Without Training [120.92623395389255]
  We tackle the problem of predicting the number of optimization steps that a pre-trained deep network needs to converge to a given value of the loss function. We leverage the fact that the training dynamics of a deep network during fine-tuning are well approximated by those of a linearized model. We are able to predict the time it takes to fine-tune a model to a given loss without having to perform any training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-28T04:29:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.