AmchiBias: Measuring Stereotypical Bias in Goan Identity Groups with a Minimal Pair Dataset in English and Konkani
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.15191v1
- Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2026 08:36:16 GMT
- Title: AmchiBias: Measuring Stereotypical Bias in Goan Identity Groups with a Minimal Pair Dataset in English and Konkani
- Abstract summary: AmchiBias is the first benchmark for measuring socio-cultural stereotypical bias for the Indian state of Goa.<n>We evaluate stereotypical bias in five multilingual encoder models on this benchmark.<n>Queried in English, models with a stronger Indian language coverage show higher bias for pan-Indian groups than hyperlocal Goan groups.
- Score: 5.457386921498268
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Socio-cultural stereotypical bias is an important consideration in the development and deployment of NLP systems. It is however often considered only at the national level, despite rich subnational socio-cultural structures. We present AmchiBias, the first benchmark for measuring socio-cultural stereotypical bias for the Indian state of Goa with its unique historically multicultural setting. It covers various Goan identity groups and comprises 313 minimal pairs across eight sociodemographic dimensions in both English and Devanagari Konkani. We then evaluate stereotypical bias in five multilingual encoder models on this benchmark. We find near-chance scores in Konkani, reflecting language incompetence for general multilingual models and a lack of Goan cultural competence for Indian language models. Queried in English, models with a stronger Indian language coverage show higher bias for pan-Indian groups than hyperlocal Goan groups. This suggests the English signal reflects pan-Indian pretraining associations rather than genuine Goan cultural knowledge. Our findings highlight a critical gap in low-resource multilingual NLP evaluation for hyperlocal community identities.
Related papers
- Evaluating and Mitigating Anti-LGBTQ Biases in German and Multilingual Language Models [1.3965477771846408]
This paper introduces a multilingual German-English benchmark dataset for the evaluation of anti-LGBTQ biases in language models.<n>It combines community-sourced stereotypes from German-speaking queer individuals with a German translation of WinoQueer.<n>Results show that language models reproduce anti-queer stereotypes, with variation across identities and models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-31T14:42:36Z) - Pluralis v0.1: Towards a Multicultural, Multimodal, Multilingual Benchmark for AI Risk and Reliability [46.80780735011334]
Current AI safety evaluation and benchmarking frameworks rely on Western-centric culture-agnostic defaults that mask critical regional laws, socio-linguistic nuances, and cultural taboos.<n>We introduce Pluralis v0.1: a novel multimodal, multi-regional, and multilingual dataset built from a culture-first perspective.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-07T12:21:52Z) - IndoBias: A Dual Track Culturally Grounded Benchmark for LLMs Bias Evaluation in Indonesian Languages [10.458023217824545]
We introduce IndoBias as a culturally-grounded bias benchmark to assess Large Language Models.<n>Our results show that existing LLMs exhibit strong bias towards prototypical sentences in Indonesian.<n>In Indonesian, Common Crawl texts introduce more bias during pretraining, compared to human-reviewed article texts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-31T14:27:31Z) - The GaoYao Benchmark: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Multilingual and Multicultural Abilities of Large Language Models [51.61416200800499]
GaoYao is a comprehensive benchmark with 182.3k samples, 26 languages and 51 nations/areas.<n>First, GaoYao proposes a unified framework categorizing evaluation tasks into three cultural layers.<n>Second, we achieve native-quality expansion by leveraging experts to rigorously localize subjective benchmarks into 19 languages.<n>Third, we conduct an in-depth diagnostic analysis on 20+ flagship and compact LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-22T06:19:46Z) - BengaliMoralBench: A Benchmark for Auditing Moral Reasoning in Large Language Models within Bengali Language and Culture [5.215285027585101]
Bengali is spoken by over 285 million people and ranked 6th globally.<n>Existing ethics benchmarks are largely English-centric and shaped by Western frameworks.<n>We introduce BengaliMoralBench, the first large-scale ethics benchmark for the Bengali language and socio-cultural contexts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-05T04:55:35Z) - Do You Know About My Nation? Investigating Multilingual Language Models' Cultural Literacy Through Factual Knowledge [68.6805229085352]
Most multilingual question-answering benchmarks do not factor in regional diversity in the information they capture.<n>XNationQA encompasses a total of 49,280 questions on the geography, culture, and history of nine countries, presented in seven languages.<n>We benchmark eight standard multilingual LLMs on XNationQA and evaluate them using two novel transference metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-01T18:41:34Z) - BharatBBQ: A Multilingual Bias Benchmark for Question Answering in the Indian Context [36.56689822791777]
Existing benchmarks, such as the Bias Benchmark for Question Answering (BBQ), primarily focus on Western contexts.<n>We introduce BharatBBQ, a culturally adapted benchmark designed to assess biases in Hindi, English, Marathi, Bengali, Tamil, Telugu, Odia, and Assamese.<n>Our dataset contains 49,108 examples in one language that are expanded using translation and verification to 392,864 examples in eight different languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-09T20:24:24Z) - Measuring South Asian Biases in Large Language Models [1.5903891569492878]
This work addresses gaps by conducting a multilingual and intersectional analysis of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We construct a culturally grounded bias lexicon capturing previously unexplored intersectional dimensions including gender, religion, marital status, and number of children.<n>We evaluate two self-debiasing strategies to measure their effectiveness in reducing culturally specific bias in Indo-Aryan and Dravidian languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-24T02:18:17Z) - CVQA: Culturally-diverse Multilingual Visual Question Answering Benchmark [68.21939124278065]
Culturally-diverse multilingual Visual Question Answering benchmark designed to cover a rich set of languages and cultures.
CVQA includes culturally-driven images and questions from across 30 countries on four continents, covering 31 languages with 13 scripts, providing a total of 10k questions.
We benchmark several Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) on CVQA, and show that the dataset is challenging for the current state-of-the-art models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-10T01:59:00Z) - SeeGULL Multilingual: a Dataset of Geo-Culturally Situated Stereotypes [18.991295993710224]
SeeGULL is a global-scale multilingual dataset of social stereotypes, spanning 20 languages, with human annotations across 23 regions, and demonstrate its utility in identifying gaps in model evaluations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-08T22:09:58Z) - Exploring Cross-Cultural Differences in English Hate Speech Annotations: From Dataset Construction to Analysis [44.17106903728264]
Most hate speech datasets neglect the cultural diversity within a single language.
To address this, we introduce CREHate, a CRoss-cultural English Hate speech dataset.
Only 56.2% of the posts in CREHate achieve consensus among all countries, with the highest pairwise label difference rate of 26%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-31T13:14:47Z) - Multi-lingual and Multi-cultural Figurative Language Understanding [69.47641938200817]
Figurative language permeates human communication, but is relatively understudied in NLP.
We create a dataset for seven diverse languages associated with a variety of cultures: Hindi, Indonesian, Javanese, Kannada, Sundanese, Swahili and Yoruba.
Our dataset reveals that each language relies on cultural and regional concepts for figurative expressions, with the highest overlap between languages originating from the same region.
All languages exhibit a significant deficiency compared to English, with variations in performance reflecting the availability of pre-training and fine-tuning data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-25T15:30:31Z) - Comparing Biases and the Impact of Multilingual Training across Multiple
Languages [70.84047257764405]
We present a bias analysis across Italian, Chinese, English, Hebrew, and Spanish on the downstream sentiment analysis task.
We adapt existing sentiment bias templates in English to Italian, Chinese, Hebrew, and Spanish for four attributes: race, religion, nationality, and gender.
Our results reveal similarities in bias expression such as favoritism of groups that are dominant in each language's culture.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-18T18:15:07Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.