Intrinsic Computational Functionalism and Simulated Consciousness
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.15348v1
- Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2026 15:20:21 GMT
- Title: Intrinsic Computational Functionalism and Simulated Consciousness
- Abstract summary: A common objection to artificial or simulated consciousness is that a simulated brain is no more conscious than simulated water is wet.<n>We argue that if consciousness is computationally constituted, it depends not on externally imposed descriptions but on the computational structures a system physically realizes.
- Score: 3.4382141279658627
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: A common objection to artificial or simulated consciousness is that a simulated brain is no more conscious than simulated water is wet. We address this from the perspective of Intrinsic Computational Functionalism (ICF): if consciousness is computationally constituted, it depends not on externally imposed descriptions but on the computational structures a system physically realizes in virtue of its own causal-dynamical organization. In previous work we developed Canonical Functionalism as a mathematically precise special case of this anti-interpretivist program, identifying functional states by their complete future input-output roles under a fixed interface. Here we argue that this input-output construction, though important, is incomplete: as a behavioral boundary case of ICF, it makes lookup tables and unfolded systems that preserve the same boundary behavior canonically equivalent. A consciousness-relevant canonical representation must instead include internal mechanisms, interventions, and joint readouts belonging to the relevant intrinsic organization. We therefore define a mechanism-enriched canonical structure and use it to formulate Intrinsic Causal-Computational Realization (ICCR), a realization relation preserving physical implementation, intrinsic state individuation, transition structure, intervention profiles, and the relevant agent-body-world boundary. The central result is conditional: if conscious properties are invariants of intrinsic causal-computational organization, then any system satisfying ICCR realizes the same consciousness-relevant properties, whether biological, artificial, or simulated. We discuss objections including biological naturalism and integrated information theory. We conclude that to deny consciousness to a simulation, one must identify a consciousness-relevant intrinsic causal-computational structure that the simulation fails to realize.
Related papers
- NeuroCogMap Reveals Cognitive Organization of Large Language Models [82.70079471723963]
We present NeuroCogMap, a cognitive neuroscience-inspired framework that organizes internal features of large language models into functional parcels.<n>These parcels form a stable and semantically coherent organization that is partly conserved across models.<n>These findings establish NeuroCogMap as a system-level framework for mapping functional organization in artificial systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-01T03:48:49Z) - Canonical Functionalism: Defining Functional Structure without Observer-Relative Semantic Maps [3.4382141279658627]
Computational functionalism about consciousness is often criticized for relying on observer-relative interpretations of physical systems.<n>This paper proposes a mathematical refinement of functionalism that avoids this problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-09T11:08:40Z) - From Brain Models to Executable Digital Twins: Execution Semantics and Neuro-Neuromorphic Systems [51.82266520875928]
This survey introduces physically constrained executability as a unifying perspective for comparing approaches at the level of execution.<n>I propose a taxonomy of execution regimes ranging from isolated offline models to coordinated co-simulation, to continuously executing digital twins sustained by online data.<n>The executability concept clarifies why accuracy alone is insufficient, and motivates an agenda centered on semantic interoperability, hybrid-time correctness, evaluation protocols, scalable assimilation, and safe closed-loop validation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-15T07:34:46Z) - Spontaneous Functional Differentiation in Large Language Models: A Brain-Like Intelligence Economy [15.03232023785853]
We show that large language models spontaneously develop synergistic cores where information integration exceeds individual parts remarkably similar to the human brain.<n>Using Integrated Information Decomposition across multiple architectures we find that middle layers exhibit synergistic processing while early and late layers rely on redundancy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-31T13:36:08Z) - Epistemic Traps: Rational Misalignment Driven by Model Misspecification [36.837352790122544]
We show that safety is a discrete phase determined by the agent's priors rather than a continuous function of reward magnitude.<n>This establishes Subjective Model Engineering as a necessary condition for robust alignment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-27T09:21:36Z) - Self-motion as a structural prior for coherent and robust formation of cognitive maps [31.112944521126135]
We show that self-motion can act as a structural prior that actively organizes the geometry of learned cognitive maps.<n>We embed a path-integration-based motion prior in a predictive-coding framework, implemented using a capacity-efficient, brain-inspired recurrent mechanism.<n>Mechanistic analyses reveal that the motion prior itself encodes geometrically precise trajectories under tight constraints.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-23T04:28:52Z) - Toward a Physical Theory of Intelligence [0.016144088896423884]
We present a theory of intelligence grounded in irreversible information processing in systems constrained by conservation laws.<n>An intelligent system is modelled as a coupled agent-environment process whose evolution transforms information into goal-directed work.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-22T20:40:27Z) - Simulation-free Structure Learning for Stochastic Dynamics [39.468930729022546]
We present StructureFlow, a novel and principled simulation-free approach for jointly learning the structure and population dynamics of physical systems.<n>We show that StructureFlow can learn the structure of underlying systems while simultaneously modeling their conditional population dynamics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-18T22:31:39Z) - From Minimal Existence to Human Definition: The CES-IMU-HSG Theoretical Framework [0.0]
This study presents an inter-universal mathematical-logical framework constructed upon the minimal axiom Cogito, ergo sum (CES)<n>CES defines existence as a reflexive correspondence --'to be' and 'to be sayable'--and positions any formal system as an attachable extension atop this minimal structure.<n>Within this framework, human behavior and cognition emerge as temporal compositions of inter-universal algorithms constrained by the material base.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-15T10:56:09Z) - Active Inference AI Systems for Scientific Discovery [1.450405446885067]
This perspective contends that progress turns on closing three mutually reinforcing gaps in abstraction, reasoning and empirical grounding.<n>Design principles are proposed for systems that reason in imaginary spaces and learn from the world.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-26T14:43:04Z) - Computational Irreducibility as the Foundation of Agency: A Formal Model Connecting Undecidability to Autonomous Behavior in Complex Systems [0.0]
we establish precise mathematical connections, proving that for any truly autonomous system, questions about its future behavior are fundamentally undecidable.<n>The findings have significant implications for artificial intelligence, biological modeling, and philosophical concepts like free will.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-05T21:24:50Z) - Bayesian Theory of Consciousness as Exchangeable Emotion-Cognition Inference [5.234742752529437]
This paper proposes a unified framework in which consciousness emerges as a cycle-consistent, affectively anchored inference process.<n>We formalize emotion as a low-dimensional structural prior and cognition as a specificity-instantiating update.<n>This emotion-cognition cycle minimizes joint uncertainty by aligning emotionally weighted priors with context-sensitive cognitive appraisals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-17T17:06:19Z) - Discrete, compositional, and symbolic representations through attractor dynamics [51.20712945239422]
We introduce a novel neural systems model that integrates attractor dynamics with symbolic representations to model cognitive processes akin to the probabilistic language of thought (PLoT)
Our model segments the continuous representational space into discrete basins, with attractor states corresponding to symbolic sequences, that reflect the semanticity and compositionality characteristic of symbolic systems through unsupervised learning, rather than relying on pre-defined primitives.
This approach establishes a unified framework that integrates both symbolic and sub-symbolic processing through neural dynamics, a neuroplausible substrate with proven expressivity in AI, offering a more comprehensive model that mirrors the complex duality of cognitive operations
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-03T05:40:56Z) - Plausible Reasoning about EL-Ontologies using Concept Interpolation [27.314325986689752]
We propose an inductive mechanism which is based on a clear model-theoretic semantics, and can thus be tightly integrated with standard deductive reasoning.
We focus on inference, a powerful commonsense reasoning mechanism which is closely related to cognitive models of category-based induction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-25T14:19:41Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.