Stringalign: Moving beyond summary statistics with a transparent Unicode-aware tool for evaluating automatic transcription models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.16015v1
• Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2026 20:57:47 GMT
• Title: Stringalign: Moving beyond summary statistics with a transparent Unicode-aware tool for evaluating automatic transcription models
• Abstract summary: This paper presents Stringalign, a Python library designed to simplify the evaluation process for automatic transcription projects.<n>Stringalign's tools to examine and visualise both the rate of errors and the types of errors a model makes, give insights into possible improvements.
• Score: 0.11458853556386794
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Comparing text strings is crucial when evaluating and understanding the performance of various text processing tasks such as document recognition and audio transcription. With an increasingly complex landscape of AI-based handwritten text recognition (HTR), optical character recognition (OCR) and automatic speech recognition (ASR) models, there is a need for tools that facilitate evaluation in a flexible and reproducible way. This paper presents Stringalign, a Python library designed to simplify the evaluation process for automatic transcription projects and facilitate transparent evaluation. Stringalign's tools to examine and visualise both the rate of errors and the types of errors a model makes, give insights into possible improvements and help inform model selection for a particular task. Widely used string comparison metrics, such as the character and word error rates (CER and WER), although useful, can be ambiguous due to varying definitions of what constitutes a character and a word. Stringalign addresses this challenge by ensuring all preprocessing (i.e. normalisation and tokenisation) is transparent and easily replicable, and by providing tools to move beyond summary statistics and analyse common model errors. Moreover, Stringalign adheres to FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) principles for research software while staying lightweight and easy to adapt into researchers existing workflows. In this paper, we discuss challenges with character and word level string comparisons and show through examples that where existing tools can yield opaque and sometimes confusing results, Stringalign provides an easy-to-use and unambiguous alternative.

Related papers

• MuTSE: A Human-in-the-Loop Multi-use Text Simplification Evaluator [0.13048920509133807]
  textbfMuTSEfootnote is an interactive human-in-the-loop web application designed to streamline the evaluation of Large Language Models.<n>The system supports concurrent execution of $P times M$ prompt-model permutations, generating a comprehensive comparison matrix in real-time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-10T04:31:43Z)
• Verbatim Data Transcription Failures in LLM Code Generation: A State-Tracking Stress Test [1.8875967655304022]
  Many real-world software tasks require exact transcription of provided data into code.<n>Small omissions or alterations can remain silent while producing syntactically valid programs.<n>This paper introduces a deliberately minimal transcription-to-code benchmark to isolate this reliability concern.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T06:38:34Z)
• Vision-Language Models are Strong Noisy Label Detectors [76.07846780815794]
  This paper presents a Denoising Fine-Tuning framework, called DeFT, for adapting vision-language models. DeFT utilizes the robust alignment of textual and visual features pre-trained on millions of auxiliary image-text pairs to sieve out noisy labels. Experimental results on seven synthetic and real-world noisy datasets validate the effectiveness of DeFT in both noisy label detection and image classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-29T12:55:17Z)
• Learning Robust Named Entity Recognizers From Noisy Data With Retrieval Augmentation [67.89838237013078]
  Named entity recognition (NER) models often struggle with noisy inputs. We propose a more realistic setting in which only noisy text and its NER labels are available. We employ a multi-view training framework that improves robust NER without retrieving text during inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-26T07:30:41Z)
• OmniParser: A Unified Framework for Text Spotting, Key Information Extraction and Table Recognition [79.852642726105]
  We propose a unified paradigm for parsing visually-situated text across diverse scenarios. Specifically, we devise a universal model, called Omni, which can simultaneously handle three typical visually-situated text parsing tasks. In Omni, all tasks share the unified encoder-decoder architecture, the unified objective point-conditioned text generation, and the unified input representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T03:51:14Z)
• Identifying and Analyzing Performance-Critical Tokens in Large Language Models [52.404072802235234]
  We study how large language models learn to perform tasks from demonstrations.<n>Our work sheds light on how large language models learn to perform tasks from demonstrations and deepens our understanding of the roles different types of tokens play in large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-20T20:55:21Z)
• TextFormer: A Query-based End-to-End Text Spotter with Mixed Supervision [61.186488081379]
  We propose TextFormer, a query-based end-to-end text spotter with Transformer architecture. TextFormer builds upon an image encoder and a text decoder to learn a joint semantic understanding for multi-task modeling. It allows for mutual training and optimization of classification, segmentation, and recognition branches, resulting in deeper feature sharing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T03:37:41Z)
• Evaluating Factual Consistency of Texts with Semantic Role Labeling [3.1776833268555134]
  We introduce SRLScore, a reference-free evaluation metric designed with text summarization in mind. A final factuality score is computed by an adjustable scoring mechanism. Correlation with human judgments on English summarization datasets shows that SRLScore is competitive with state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T17:59:42Z)
• Composable Text Controls in Latent Space with ODEs [97.12426987887021]
  This paper proposes a new efficient approach for composable text operations in the compact latent space of text. By connecting pretrained LMs to the latent space through efficient adaption, we then decode the sampled vectors into desired text sequences. Experiments show that composing those operators within our approach manages to generate or edit high-quality text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-01T06:51:45Z)
• Lexically Aware Semi-Supervised Learning for OCR Post-Correction [90.54336622024299]
  Much of the existing linguistic data in many languages of the world is locked away in non-digitized books and documents. Previous work has demonstrated the utility of neural post-correction methods on recognition of less-well-resourced languages. We present a semi-supervised learning method that makes it possible to utilize raw images to improve performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-04T04:39:02Z)
• Comparing Text Representations: A Theory-Driven Approach [2.893558866535708]
  We adapt general tools from computational learning theory to fit the specific characteristics of text datasets. We present a method to evaluate the compatibility between representations and tasks. This method provides a calibrated, quantitative measure of the difficulty of a classification-based NLP task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-15T17:48:19Z)
• Do Encoder Representations of Generative Dialogue Models Encode Sufficient Information about the Task ? [41.36218215755317]
  We showcase evaluating the text generated through human or automatic metrics is not sufficient to appropriately evaluate soundness of the language understanding of dialogue models. We propose a set of probe tasks to evaluate encoder representation of different language encoders commonly used in dialogue models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-20T04:52:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.