Can LLM Agents Infer World Models? Evidence from Agentic Automata Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.16576v1
• Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 11:23:13 GMT
• Title: Can LLM Agents Infer World Models? Evidence from Agentic Automata Learning
• Abstract summary: We evaluate the extent to which tool-calling LLM agents can uncover hidden environments through interaction.<n>In our setup, an agent should uncover a hidden deterministic finite automaton (DFA) by interacting with an oracle.<n>We find that performance drops sharply as DFA size increases.
• Score: 33.77002260033358
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: We propose agentic automata learning to evaluate the extent to which tool-calling LLM agents can uncover hidden environments through interaction. In our setup, an agent should uncover a hidden deterministic finite automaton (DFA) by interacting with an oracle through (1) membership queries ("Does this string belong to the target language?") and (2) equivalence queries ("Is this the target DFA?"). This yields a scalable testbed with controlled task complexity, measurable interaction efficiency, and strong baselines (classic automata-learning algorithms). Evaluating state-of-the-art LLMs, we find that performance drops sharply as DFA size increases. Reasoning models are markedly stronger than non-reasoning models, yet trajectory analyses reveal recurring failures in query planning, evidence integration, and hypothesis construction. Overall, our results show that current LLM agents can sometimes perform non-trivial interactive discovery, but remain far less robust and efficient than classic algorithms for the task.

Related papers

• Learning to Refine: An Agentic RL Approach for Iterative SPARQL Query Construction [0.18907108368038208]
  Current methods lack the adaptive policies needed to dynamically debug queries based on real-time execution feedback.<n>This paper introduces a novel agentic framework where an LLM learns a resilient policy for the sequential process of iterative SPARQL construction.<n>We show that a compact 3B- parameter model, trained exclusively via outcome-driven Reinforcement Learning (GRPO), can learn effective policies for this task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-14T08:44:58Z)
• Agentic Reinforced Policy Optimization [66.96989268893932]
  Large-scale reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has demonstrated its effectiveness in harnessing the potential of large language models (LLMs) for single-turn reasoning tasks.<n>Current RL algorithms inadequately balance the models' intrinsic long-horizon reasoning capabilities and their proficiency in multi-turn tool interactions.<n>We propose Agentic Reinforced Policy Optimization (ARPO), a novel agentic RL algorithm tailored for training multi-turn LLM-based agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-26T07:53:11Z)
• Iterative Self-Incentivization Empowers Large Language Models as Agentic Searchers [74.17516978246152]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been widely integrated into information retrieval to advance traditional techniques.<n>We propose EXSEARCH, an agentic search framework, where the LLM learns to retrieve useful information as the reasoning unfolds.<n>Experiments on four knowledge-intensive benchmarks show that EXSEARCH substantially outperforms baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T15:27:55Z)
• Distilling LLM Agent into Small Models with Retrieval and Code Tools [65.73762766854192]
  Agent Distillation is a framework for transferring reasoning capability and task-solving behavior from large language models into small language models.<n>Our results show that sLMs as small as 0.5B, 1.5B, 3B parameters can achieve performance competitive with next-tier larger 1.5B, 3B, 7B models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T08:20:15Z)
• Scaling Autonomous Agents via Automatic Reward Modeling And Planning [52.39395405893965]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a range of tasks.<n>However, they still struggle with problems requiring multi-step decision-making and environmental feedback.<n>We propose a framework that can automatically learn a reward model from the environment without human annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T18:49:25Z)
• Automated test generation to evaluate tool-augmented LLMs as conversational AI agents [0.27309692684728615]
  We present a test generation pipeline to evaluate conversational AI agents. Our framework uses LLMs to generate diverse tests grounded on user-defined procedures. Our results show that while tool-augmented LLMs perform well in single interactions, they often struggle to handle complete conversations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-24T09:57:43Z)
• LLMs as Probabilistic Minimally Adequate Teachers for DFA Learning [11.037017229299607]
  The emergence of intelligence in large language models (LLMs) has inspired investigations into their integration into automata learning. This paper introduces the probabilistic Minimally Adequate Teacher (pMAT) formulation. We develop techniques to improve answer accuracy and ensure the correctness of the learned automata.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-06T07:12:09Z)
• Can Long-Context Language Models Subsume Retrieval, RAG, SQL, and More? [54.667202878390526]
  Long-context language models (LCLMs) have the potential to revolutionize our approach to tasks traditionally reliant on external tools like retrieval systems or databases. We introduce LOFT, a benchmark of real-world tasks requiring context up to millions of tokens designed to evaluate LCLMs' performance on in-context retrieval and reasoning. Our findings reveal LCLMs' surprising ability to rival state-of-the-art retrieval and RAG systems, despite never having been explicitly trained for these tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T00:28:58Z)
• AutoAct: Automatic Agent Learning from Scratch for QA via Self-Planning [54.47116888545878]
  AutoAct is an automatic agent learning framework for QA. It does not rely on large-scale annotated data and synthetic planning trajectories from closed-source models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-10T16:57:24Z)
• ReEval: Automatic Hallucination Evaluation for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models via Transferable Adversarial Attacks [91.55895047448249]
  This paper presents ReEval, an LLM-based framework using prompt chaining to perturb the original evidence for generating new test cases. We implement ReEval using ChatGPT and evaluate the resulting variants of two popular open-domain QA datasets. Our generated data is human-readable and useful to trigger hallucination in large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T06:37:32Z)
• MLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning Experimentation [96.71370747681078]
  We introduce MLAgentBench, a suite of 13 tasks ranging from improving model performance on CIFAR-10 to recent research problems like BabyLM. For each task, an agent can perform actions like reading/writing files, executing code, and inspecting outputs. We benchmark agents based on Claude v1.0, Claude v2.1, Claude v3 Opus, GPT-4, GPT-4-turbo, Gemini-Pro, and Mixtral and find that a Claude v3 Opus agent is the best in terms of success rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T04:06:12Z)
• Enabling Intelligent Interactions between an Agent and an LLM: A Reinforcement Learning Approach [31.6589518077397]
  Large language models (LLMs) encode a vast amount of world knowledge acquired from massive text datasets. LLMs can assist an embodied agent in solving complex sequential decision making tasks by providing high-level instructions. We propose When2Ask, a reinforcement learning based approach that learns when it is necessary to query LLMs for high-level instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T11:49:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.