Abstention-Aware Personalized Object Rearrangement via Uncertainty-Guided LLM Assistance

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.17309v1
• Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 21:26:48 GMT
• Title: Abstention-Aware Personalized Object Rearrangement via Uncertainty-Guided LLM Assistance
• Abstract summary: APOLLO is a hybrid framework for abstention-aware personalized object rearrangement.<n>It combines a lightweight, personalized embedding model (PEM) with selective large language model (LLM) assistance.
• Score: 4.769747792846005
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Robotic assistance in household environments requires not only predicting where objects should be placed, but also reasoning about when objects should not be placed at all. Existing approaches to personalized object rearrangement primarily focus on placement decisions under the assumption of clean observations and complete actionability, limiting their applicability in realistic, cluttered, and partially erroneous settings. In this paper, we introduce APOLLO, a hybrid framework for abstention-aware personalized object rearrangement that combines a lightweight, personalized embedding model (PEM) with selective large language model (LLM) assistance. PEM is trained for each user-environment pair using a small number of demonstrations, operates entirely on CPU, and produces uncertainty estimates, which are used to selectively invoke LLM-based reasoning only for ambiguous decisions, balancing efficiency, privacy, and reasoning capability. To evaluate this formulation beyond existing benchmarks, we introduce APOR, a synthetic, LLM-generated dataset that captures room-level, multi-furniture environments, diverse organizational profiles, explicit abstention behavior, and noisy partial scene context. Extensive experiments on both PARSEC and APOR provide initial evidence that APOLLO improves over prior LLM-based baselines in controlled benchmark settings while substantially reducing LLM usage. Code is available at https://github.com/PaInt-Lab/APOLLO.

Related papers

• Learning POMDP World Models from Observations with Language-Model Priors [52.11151769796862]
  Partially-observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs) provide a flexible modeling class for internal world models.<n>We ask whether language-model priors can reduce costly interaction by leveraging prior knowledge.<n>We show that emphPinductor matches the performance and sample efficiency of LLM-based POMDP learning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T16:18:15Z)
• LLMs for Resource Allocation: A Participatory Budgeting Approach to Inferring Preferences [17.089038477886486]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly expected to handle complex decision-making tasks, but their ability to perform structured resource allocation remains underexplored.<n>We present a dual-purpose framework leveraging Participatory Budgeting (PB) both as (i) a practical setting for LLM-based resource allocation and (ii) an adaptive benchmark for evaluating their reasoning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-08T06:45:07Z)
• Evaluating Personalized Tool-Augmented LLMs from the Perspectives of Personalization and Proactivity [17.723293304671877]
  We introduce a novel benchmark ETAPP for evaluating personalized tool invocation.<n>To improve the accuracy of our evaluation, we propose a key-point-based evaluation method.<n>The effectiveness of our preference-setting and key-point-based evaluation method is also validated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-02T07:36:22Z)
• Latent Factor Models Meets Instructions: Goal-conditioned Latent Factor Discovery without Task Supervision [50.45597801390757]
  Instruct-LF is a goal-oriented latent factor discovery system.<n>It integrates instruction-following ability with statistical models to handle noisy datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-21T02:03:08Z)
• LLM-Lasso: A Robust Framework for Domain-Informed Feature Selection and Regularization [59.75242204923353]
  We introduce LLM-Lasso, a framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) to guide feature selection in Lasso regression.<n>LLMs generate penalty factors for each feature, which are converted into weights for the Lasso penalty using a simple, tunable model.<n>Features identified as more relevant by the LLM receive lower penalties, increasing their likelihood of being retained in the final model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-15T02:55:22Z)
• Few-shot Steerable Alignment: Adapting Rewards and LLM Policies with Neural Processes [50.544186914115045]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly embedded in everyday applications.<n> Ensuring their alignment with the diverse preferences of individual users has become a critical challenge.<n>We present a novel framework for few-shot steerable alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T16:14:59Z)
• MetaAlign: Align Large Language Models with Diverse Preferences during Inference Time [50.41806216615488]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) acquire extensive knowledge and remarkable abilities from extensive text corpora. To make LLMs more usable, aligning them with human preferences is essential. We propose an effective method, textbf MetaAlign, which aims to help LLMs dynamically align with various explicit or implicit preferences specified at inference time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T05:31:13Z)
• Embodied Agent Interface: Benchmarking LLMs for Embodied Decision Making [85.24399869971236]
  We aim to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) for embodied decision making.<n>Existing evaluations tend to rely solely on a final success rate.<n>We propose a generalized interface (Embodied Agent Interface) that supports the formalization of various types of tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T17:59:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.