Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models on Fine-Grained Image Tasks: From Evaluation to Diagnosis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.19053v1
• Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 13:23:26 GMT
• Title: Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models on Fine-Grained Image Tasks: From Evaluation to Diagnosis
• Abstract summary: We introduce FG-BMK, a comprehensive fine-grained evaluation benchmark containing 1.01 million questions and 0.28 million images.<n>We find that current LVLMs remain inadequate fine-grained recognizers, with failures arising from intertwined bottlenecks in visual representations, semantic grounding, modality alignment, and category-level knowledge.
• Score: 63.49939245944781
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent advancements in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated remarkable multimodal perception and reasoning capabilities. While numerous benchmarks have evaluated LVLMs from holistic or task-specific perspectives, their capabilities on fine-grained image tasks-fundamental to computer vision-remain insufficiently understood. To address this gap, we introduce FG-BMK, a comprehensive fine-grained evaluation benchmark containing 1.01 million questions and 0.28 million images, covering diverse scenarios from common object-centric domains to specialized domains. FG-BMK jointly evaluates dialogue-level fine-grained semantic recognition and feature-level visual discriminability through human-oriented and machine-oriented paradigms, enabling diagnostic analysis of whether LVLM failures arise from insufficient visual representations, weak visual-to-semantic grounding, or limited fine-grained knowledge. Through extensive experiments on a diverse set of representative LVLMs/VLMs, we find that current LVLMs remain inadequate fine-grained recognizers, with failures arising from intertwined bottlenecks in visual representations, semantic grounding, modality alignment, and category-level knowledge. We further analyze training design factors for improving fine-grained capabilities and examine how visual and linguistic perturbations affect LVLM predictions. These findings provide diagnostic insights into the limitations of current LVLMs and offer guidance for future data construction and model design in developing more reliable LVLMs for fine-grained visual tasks. Our code is open-source and available at https://fg-bmk.github.io/.

Related papers

• Predictive Regularization Against Visual Representation Degradation in Multimodal Large Language Models [84.94288033791346]
  We conduct a detailed diagnostic analysis to unveil a pervasive issue: visual representation degradation in MLLMs.<n>We attribute this phenomenon to a visual sacrifice driven by the singular text-generation objective, where the model compromises its visual fidelity to optimize for answer generation.<n>We propose Predictive Regularization to force degraded intermediate features to predict initial visual features, thereby maintaining the inherent visual attributes of the MLLM's internal representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-21T13:10:37Z)
• Understanding the Fine-Grained Knowledge Capabilities of Vision-Language Models [42.79282247484499]
  Vision-language models (VLMs) have made substantial progress across a wide range of visual question answering benchmarks, spanning visual reasoning, document understanding, and multimodal dialogue.<n>Recent works show that these models trail behind in traditional image classification benchmarks, which test fine-grained visual knowledge.<n>We test a large number of recent VLMs on fine-grained classification benchmarks and identify potential factors in the disconnect between fine-grained knowledge and other vision benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T22:07:29Z)
• Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models on Fine-Grained Image Tasks: A Comprehensive Evaluation [53.84282335629258]
  We introduce a comprehensive fine-grained evaluation benchmark, i.e., FG-BMK, comprising 1.01 million questions and 0.33 million images.<n>Our evaluation systematically examines LVLMs from both human-oriented and machine-oriented perspectives.<n>We uncover key findings regarding the influence of training paradigms, modality alignment, perturbation susceptibility, and fine-grained category reasoning on task performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T09:30:41Z)
• Are Large Vision Language Models Good Game Players? [25.49713745405194]
  Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated remarkable abilities in understanding and reasoning about both visual and textual information.<n>Existing evaluation methods for LVLMs, primarily based on benchmarks like Visual Question Answering, often fail to capture the full scope of LVLMs' capabilities.<n>We propose method, a game-based evaluation framework designed to provide a comprehensive assessment of LVLMs' cognitive and reasoning skills in structured environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T07:29:03Z)
• Finer: Investigating and Enhancing Fine-Grained Visual Concept Recognition in Large Vision Language Models [57.95366341738857]
  In-depth analyses show that instruction-tuned LVLMs exhibit modality gap, showing discrepancy when given textual and visual inputs that correspond to the same concept.<n>We propose a multiple attribute-centric evaluation benchmark, Finer, to evaluate LVLMs' fine-grained visual comprehension ability and provide significantly improved explainability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T05:43:51Z)
• Mitigating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models via Image-Grounded Guidance [51.30560006045442]
  Image-gRounded guIdaNcE (MARINE) is a framework that is both training-free and API-free.<n>MARINE effectively and efficiently reduces object hallucinations during inference by introducing image-grounded guidance to LVLMs.<n>Our framework's flexibility further allows for the integration of multiple vision models, enabling more reliable and robust object-level guidance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T18:59:05Z)
• Behind the Magic, MERLIM: Multi-modal Evaluation Benchmark for Large Image-Language Models [50.653838482083614]
  This paper introduces a scalable test-bed to assess the capabilities of IT-LVLMs on fundamental computer vision tasks.<n> MERLIM contains over 300K image-question pairs and has a strong focus on detecting cross-modal "hallucination" events in IT-LVLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-03T16:39:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.